Suppr超能文献

伴有心房颤动和颅外动脉狭窄的卒中后患者的最佳抗血栓治疗策略:一项全国性队列研究。

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for post-stroke patients with atrial fibrillation and extracranial artery stenosis-a nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, and Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2024 Mar 13;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03338-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In post-stroke atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who have indications for both oral anticoagulant (OAC) and antiplatelet agent (AP), e.g., those with carotid artery stenosis, there is debate over the best antithrombotic strategy. We aimed to compare the risks of ischemic stroke, composite of ischemic stroke/major bleeding and composite of ischemic stroke/intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between different antithrombotic strategies.

METHODS

This study included post-stroke AF patients with and without extracranial artery stenosis (ECAS) (n = 6390 and 28,093, respectively) identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Risks of clinical outcomes and net clinical benefit (NCB) with different antithrombotic strategies were compared to AP alone.

RESULTS

The risk of recurrent ischemic stroke was higher for patients with ECAS than those without (12.72%/yr versus 10.60/yr; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.104, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.052-1.158, p < 0.001). For patients with ECAS, when compared to AP only, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy was associated with lower risks for ischaemic stroke (aHR 0.551, 95% CI 0.454-0.669), the composite of ischaemic stroke/major bleeding (aHR 0.626, 95% CI 0.529-0.741) and the composite of ischaemic stroke/ICH (aHR 0.577, 95% CI 0.478-0.697), with non-significant difference for major bleeding and ICH. When compared to AP only, warfarin monotherapy was associated with higher risks of major bleeding (aHR 1.521, 95% CI 1.231-1.880), ICH (aHR 2.045, 95% CI 1.329-3.148), and the composite of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding. With combination of AP plus warfarin, there was an increase in ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, and the composite outcomes, when compared to AP only. NOAC monotherapy was the only approach associated with a positive NCB, while all other options (warfarin, combination of AP-OAC) were associated with negative NCB.

CONCLUSIONS

For post-stroke AF patients with ECAS, NOAC monotherapy was associated with lower risks of adverse outcomes and a positive NCB. Combination of AP with NOAC or warfarin did not offer any benefit, but more bleeding especially with AP-warfarin combination therapy.

摘要

背景

在有口服抗凝剂(OAC)和抗血小板药物(AP)指征的卒中后心房颤动(AF)患者中,例如有颈动脉狭窄的患者,关于最佳抗血栓形成策略存在争议。我们旨在比较不同抗血栓形成策略之间缺血性卒中、缺血性卒中和主要出血的复合终点以及缺血性卒中和颅内出血(ICH)的复合终点的风险。

方法

本研究纳入了从台湾全民健康保险研究数据库中确定的伴有和不伴有颅外动脉狭窄(ECAS)的卒中后 AF 患者(分别为 6390 例和 28093 例)。与单独使用 AP 相比,比较了不同抗血栓形成策略的临床结局和净临床获益(NCB)风险。

结果

伴有 ECAS 的患者的复发性缺血性卒中风险高于不伴有 ECAS 的患者(12.72%/年比 10.60%/年;调整后的危险比[aHR]1.104,95%置信区间[CI]1.052-1.158,p<0.001)。对于伴有 ECAS 的患者,与单独使用 AP 相比,非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)单药治疗与较低的缺血性卒中风险相关(aHR 0.551,95%CI 0.454-0.669)、缺血性卒中和主要出血的复合终点(aHR 0.626,95%CI 0.529-0.741)以及缺血性卒中和 ICH 的复合终点(aHR 0.577,95%CI 0.478-0.697),大出血和 ICH 无显著差异。与单独使用 AP 相比,华法林单药治疗与大出血(aHR 1.521,95%CI 1.231-1.880)、ICH(aHR 2.045,95%CI 1.329-3.148)和缺血性卒中和主要出血的复合终点风险升高相关。与 AP 加华法林联合治疗相比,AP 加华法林联合治疗与缺血性卒中和主要出血的复合终点风险升高相关。与单独使用 AP 相比,NOAC 单药治疗与 NCB 呈正相关,而所有其他选择(华法林、AP-OAC 联合治疗)与 NCB 呈负相关。

结论

对于伴有 ECAS 的卒中后 AF 患者,NOAC 单药治疗与不良结局风险降低和 NCB 呈正相关。AP 与 NOAC 或华法林联合使用并不能带来任何益处,但会增加出血风险,尤其是 AP-华法林联合治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1e3/10935818/e257f6b6c243/12916_2024_3338_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验