• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trial Forge Guidance 4: a guideline for reporting the results of randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs).试验锻造指南 4:在试验内随机研究(SWATs)中报告结果的指南。
Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08004-0.
2
Guidelines for reporting pediatric and child health clinical trial protocols and reports: study protocol for SPIRIT-Children and CONSORT-Children.儿科和儿童健康临床试验方案和报告报告指南:SPIRIT-Children 和 CONSORT-Children 的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07948-7.
3
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?试验构建指南1:试验中的研究(SWAT)是什么?
Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5.
7
Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials.嵌入式招募试验报告指南。
Trials. 2016 Jan 14;17:27. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1126-y.
8
Trial Forge Guidance 2: how to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed.试验 Forge 指南 2:如何决定是否需要进一步的试验内研究(SWAT)。
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3980-5.
9
SWATted away: the challenging experience of setting up a programme of SWATs in paediatric trials.被特警突袭:在儿科试验中设立特警小组计划的挑战性经历。
Trials. 2019 Feb 19;20(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3236-4.
10
The Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement.《行为干预单一案例报告指南(SCRIBE)2016 声明》
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Jun;56:133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of a Study Within a Trial to evaluate a decision support intervention for families deciding about research on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent (CONSULT SWAT).在试验中开展一项研究的可行性,该研究旨在评估一种决策支持干预措施,用于帮助代表无同意能力的成年人做出研究相关决策的家庭(CONSULT SWAT)。
Trials. 2025 Aug 27;26(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09021-3.
2
Trial Forge Guidance 5: ethical considerations in randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs).试验锻造指南5:试验中的随机研究(SWATs)中的伦理考量。
Trials. 2025 Aug 2;26(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08958-9.
3
What is the impact on recruitment of a shortened compared with a standard-length participant information leaflet? PROMETHEUS in IBD-BOOST: study within a trial, a decentralised UK randomised controlled trial.与标准长度的参与者信息手册相比,缩短版手册对招募工作有何影响?IBD-BOOST中的普罗米修斯研究:一项试验中的研究,一项英国去中心化随机对照试验。
Trials. 2025 Jun 18;26(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08931-6.
4
Can a Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) Informed Participant Information Leaflet (PIL) Improve Trial Recruitment, Retention, and Quality of Decision Making? Results of a Randomised Controlled Double-Blind Study Within a Trial (SWAT).一份由公众和患者参与(PPI)提供信息的患者信息传单(PIL)能否改善试验招募、保留率和决策质量?一项试验中的随机对照双盲研究(SWAT)结果。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70321. doi: 10.1111/hex.70321.

本文引用的文献

1
An embedded randomised controlled retention trial of personalised text messages compared to non-personalised text messages in an orthopaedic setting.在骨科环境中,一项将个性化短信与非个性化短信进行比较的嵌入式随机对照留存试验。
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 11;9:591. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.24244.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Including a pen and/or cover letter, containing social incentive text, had no effect on questionnaire response rate: a factorial randomised controlled Study within a Trial.包含一支笔和/或求职信(其中含有社会激励性文字)对问卷回复率没有影响:一项试验中的析因随机对照研究。
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 17;9:623. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23767.2. eCollection 2020.
3
Pre-notification and personalisation of text messages to increase questionnaire completion in a smoking cessation pregnancy RCT: an embedded randomised factorial trial.预通知和短信个性化以提高戒烟妊娠 RCT 中调查问卷的完成率:一项嵌入式随机因子试验。
F1000Res. 2021 Jul 22;10:637. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51964.2. eCollection 2021.
4
Enclosing a pen to improve response rate to postal questionnaire: an embedded randomised controlled trial.随信附上一支笔以提高邮寄问卷的回复率:一项嵌入式随机对照试验。
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 9;9:577. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23651.1. eCollection 2020.
5
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 6;3(3):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3.
6
The effectiveness of a contingent financial incentive to improve trial follow up; a randomised study within a trial (SWAT).一种改善试验随访的有条件经济激励措施的有效性;试验中的随机研究(SWAT)。
F1000Res. 2019 Nov 20;8:1937. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21059.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Trial Forge Guidance 2: how to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed.试验 Forge 指南 2:如何决定是否需要进一步的试验内研究(SWAT)。
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3980-5.
8
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study.在临床试验中,哪些是最重要的未解决的研究问题?一项詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系:PRioRiTy II(随机试验中优先考虑保留率)研究。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3687-7.
9
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study.利用詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目确定试验招募的不确定性——PRioRiTy(随机试验中的招募优先排序)研究
Trials. 2018 Mar 1;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4.
10
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?试验构建指南1:试验中的研究(SWAT)是什么?
Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5.

试验锻造指南 4:在试验内随机研究(SWATs)中报告结果的指南。

Trial Forge Guidance 4: a guideline for reporting the results of randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs).

机构信息

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08004-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08004-0
PMID:38475795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10935912/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence to support decisions on trial processes is minimal. One way to generate this evidence is to use a Study Within A Trial (SWAT) to test trial processes or explore methodological uncertainties. SWAT evidence relies on replication to ensure sufficient power and broad applicability of findings. Prompt reporting is therefore essential; however, SWAT publications are often the first to be abandoned in the face of other time pressures. Reporting guidance for embedded methodology trials does exist but is not widely used. We sought therefore to build on these guidelines to develop a straightforward, concise reporting standard, which remains adherent to the CONSORT guideline.

METHODS

An iterative process was used to develop the guideline. This included initial meetings with key stakeholders, development of an initial guideline, pilot testing of draft guidelines, further iteration and pilot testing, and finalisation of the guideline.

RESULTS

We developed a reporting guideline applicable to randomised SWATs, including replications of previous evaluations. The guideline follows the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and provides example text to ensure ease and clarity of reporting across all domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The SWAT reporting guideline will aid authors, reviewers, and journal editors to produce and review clear, structured reports of randomised SWATs, whilst also adhering to the CONSORT guideline.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EQUATOR Network - Guidelines Under Development ( https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-clinical-trials/#SWAT ). Registered on 25 March 2021.

摘要

背景

支持试验过程决策的证据很少。生成此证据的一种方法是使用嵌套试验中的研究(SWAT)来测试试验过程或探索方法学上的不确定性。SWAT 证据依赖于复制以确保发现具有足够的功效和广泛的适用性。因此,及时报告至关重要;但是,在面临其他时间压力时,SWAT 出版物通常是最先被放弃的。嵌入式方法试验的报告指南确实存在,但并未广泛使用。因此,我们寻求在这些指南的基础上制定一个简单明了的报告标准,该标准仍然符合 CONSORT 指南。

方法

采用迭代过程制定指南。这包括与主要利益相关者进行初步会议、制定初始指南、对指南草案进行试点测试、进一步迭代和试点测试以及最终确定指南。

结果

我们制定了适用于随机 SWAT 的报告指南,包括对以前评估的重复。该指南遵循 CONSORT 声明,并提供示例文本,以确保在所有领域报告的清晰性和结构。

结论

SWAT 报告指南将有助于作者、评审员和期刊编辑生成和审查清晰、结构化的随机 SWAT 报告,同时也符合 CONSORT 指南。

试验注册

EQUATOR 网络-正在制定的指南(https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-clinical-trials/#SWAT)。于 2021 年 3 月 25 日注册。