Suppr超能文献

青少年故意纵火者中特定犯罪脚本:对火灾倾向的一种可能解释。

Offence-specific scripts among juvenile deliberate firesetters: a possible explanation for fire proclivity.

作者信息

Perks Danielle L C, Watt Bruce D, Fritzon Katarina M

机构信息

School of Psychology, Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 25;31(1):76-96. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2175067. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The study employed inductive-thematic analysis to identify dynamic cognitive-emotional processes occurring in proximity to deliberate firesetting among a sample of  = 35 adjudicated juvenile firesetters. Six fire-specific themes were determined. Three of these themes are akin to an implicit theory (i.e. a belief system informed by previous experiences): Fire Interest, Fire is Controllable, and Fire Denial/Accidental. Three of these themes are consistent with a cognitive script (i.e. a behavioural guide for how and when to use fire): (a) fire is destructive; (b) fire conceals evidence; and (c) fire creates calm. When reviewed more closely, the theme 'fire is destructive' is composed of two separate subcategories: 'fire creates destructive fun' and 'fire is a destructive tool for revenge'. The findings have risk assessment and treatment implications for juvenile firesetters.

摘要

该研究采用归纳主题分析法,以确定在35名被判定纵火的青少年样本中,与故意纵火行为相关的动态认知-情感过程。确定了六个与火灾相关的主题。其中三个主题类似于一种隐性理论(即一种基于以往经验的信念体系):对火的兴趣、火是可控的、否认火灾/意外火灾。其中三个主题与一种认知脚本(即关于如何以及何时使用火的行为指南)一致:(a)火具有破坏性;(b)火能隐藏证据;(c)火能带来平静。进一步审视时,“火具有破坏性”这一主题由两个独立的子类别组成:“火带来破坏性的乐趣”和“火是报复的破坏性工具”。这些发现对青少年纵火者的风险评估和治疗具有启示意义。

相似文献

2
Pathways to Firesetting for Mentally Disordered Offenders: A Preliminary Examination.精神错乱罪犯纵火的途径:初步考察
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 Jun;61(8):938-955. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15611127. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
3
The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale: reliability and validity.适应纵火评估量表:信度和效度。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 Jul;66(7):642-654. doi: 10.1111/jir.12950. Epub 2022 May 27.
7
Juvenile Firesetting.青少年纵火
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Jan;25(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

4
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
5
Pathways to Firesetting for Mentally Disordered Offenders: A Preliminary Examination.精神错乱罪犯纵火的途径:初步考察
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 Jun;61(8):938-955. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15611127. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
6
Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.定性研究中确定严谨性策略的批判性分析
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501. Epub 2015 Jul 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验