School of Science and Technology, Department of Physical Therapy, São Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente, Brazil.
Department of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, University of Toledo, OH.
J Athl Train. 2024 Nov 1;59(11):1110-1117. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0649.23.
People with patellofemoral pain (PFP) may have lower performance during the forward step-down and single-leg hop with their painful (unilateral complaints) or most painful (bilateral complaints) limb when compared with pain-free controls. However, no authors have investigated the appropriateness of using the pain-free or less painful limb as a reference standard in clinical practice or whether deficits might be present depending on the laterality of pain.
To compare performance scores and proportion of side-to-side limb symmetry during the forward step-down and single-leg hop tests among people with unilateral and bilateral PFP and pain-free controls.
Cross-sectional study.
Laboratory.
Fifty-two young adults (18-35 years old) with unilateral PFP, 72 with bilateral PFP, and 76 controls.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Group × limb interactions on performance during the step-down (repetitions) and single-leg hop (distance [cm] normalized by the limb length) tests were investigated using a repeated-measures analysis of covariance controlling for sex. Pairwise comparisons were interpreted using effect sizes. A χ2 test was used to compare the proportion of symmetry/asymmetry (cutoff point of ≥90% for symmetry indices) across groups and tests.
Main effects for groups (small to medium effects) but not limbs indicated lower performance of both limbs of individuals with unilateral and bilateral PFP than controls during forward step-down and single-leg hop tests. No significant differences for the proportion of symmetry/asymmetry were identified across groups (P ≥.05), which further suggests an impaired physical performance of the contralateral limb.
Our results indicate bilateral deficits in the physical performance of people with unilateral and bilateral PFP when compared with pain-free controls during the forward step-down and single-leg hop tests. Limb symmetry indices greater than 90% should be interpreted with caution, as they may overstate physical performance by not assuming bilateral deficits.
与无痛对照组相比,髌股疼痛(PFP)患者在单腿单足跳下台阶和单腿跳跃测试中,其患侧(单侧疼痛)或最痛侧(双侧疼痛)下肢的表现可能较差。然而,尚无研究报道在临床实践中,是否可将无痛或疼痛较轻的下肢作为参考标准,以及根据疼痛的侧别,是否会出现缺陷。
比较单侧和双侧 PFP 患者及无痛对照组在单腿单足跳下台阶和单腿跳跃测试中的表现评分和侧间对称性比例。
横断面研究。
实验室。
52 例单侧 PFP 年轻患者(18-35 岁)、72 例双侧 PFP 患者和 76 例无痛对照组。
采用重复测量协方差分析,控制性别因素,对步下测试(重复次数)和单腿跳跃测试(以肢体长度标准化的距离[cm])的组×肢体交互作用进行研究。使用效应量进行两两比较。使用 χ2 检验比较各组和各测试之间的对称性/非对称性比例(对称性指数的≥90%为对称性截止点)。
主要组间效应(小到中等效应),而不是肢体效应表明,与无痛对照组相比,单侧和双侧 PFP 患者在单腿单足跳下台阶和单腿跳跃测试中,双侧下肢的表现均较差。各组之间对称性/非对称性的比例没有差异(P≥.05),这进一步表明对侧肢体的身体表现受损。
与无痛对照组相比,单侧和双侧 PFP 患者在单腿单足跳下台阶和单腿跳跃测试中,其身体表现存在双侧缺陷。对称性指数大于 90%应该谨慎解释,因为它们可能没有考虑到双侧缺陷,从而高估了身体表现。