• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市亲属改善农村患者泌尿生殖系统癌症的生存差距。

Urban relatives ameliorate survival disparities for genitourinary cancer in rural patients.

机构信息

Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Mar;13(5):e7058. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7058.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.7058
PMID:38477496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10935886/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients living in rural areas have worse cancer-specific outcomes. This study examines the effect of family-based social capital on genitourinary cancer survival. We hypothesized that rural patients with urban relatives have improved survival relative to rural patients without urban family.

METHODS

We examined rural and urban based Utah individuals diagnosed with genitourinary cancers between 1968 and 2018. Familial networks were determined using the Utah Population Database. Patients and relatives were classified as rural or urban based on 2010 rural-urban commuting area codes. Overall survival was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 24,746 patients with genitourinary cancer with a median follow-up of 8.72 years. Rural cancer patients without an urban relative had the worst outcomes with cancer-specific survival hazard ratios (HRs) at 5 and 10 years of 1.33 (95% CI 1.10-1.62) and 1.46 (95% CI 1.24-1.73), respectively relative to urban patients. Rural patients with urban first-degree relatives had improved survival with 5- and 10-year survival HRs of 1.21 (95% CI 1.06-1.40) and 1.16 (95% CI 1.03-1.31), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest rural patients who have been diagnosed with a genitourinary cancer have improved survival when having relatives in urban centers relative to rural patients without urban relatives. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms through which having an urban family member contributes to improved cancer outcomes for rural patients. Better characterization of this affect may help inform policies to reduce urban-rural cancer disparities.

摘要

简介

农村地区的患者癌症特异性结局较差。本研究探讨了基于家庭的社会资本对泌尿生殖系统癌症生存的影响。我们假设,与没有城市亲属的农村患者相比,有城市亲属的农村患者的生存情况有所改善。

方法

我们检查了 1968 年至 2018 年间在犹他州被诊断患有泌尿生殖系统癌症的农村和城市居民。使用犹他州人口数据库确定家族网络。根据 2010 年城乡通勤区代码,将患者和亲属分为农村或城市。使用 Cox 比例风险模型分析总生存情况。

结果

我们确定了 24746 名患有泌尿生殖系统癌症的患者,中位随访时间为 8.72 年。没有城市亲属的农村癌症患者预后最差,5 年和 10 年癌症特异性生存风险比(HRs)分别为 1.33(95%CI 1.10-1.62)和 1.46(95%CI 1.24-1.73),而城市患者的 HRs 分别为 1.00 和 1.00。有城市一级亲属的农村患者的生存情况有所改善,5 年和 10 年的生存率 HRs 分别为 1.21(95%CI 1.06-1.40)和 1.16(95%CI 1.03-1.31)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与没有城市亲属的农村患者相比,被诊断患有泌尿生殖系统癌症的农村患者在有城市中心的亲属时生存情况有所改善。需要进一步研究以更好地了解有城市家庭成员如何改善农村患者的癌症结局的机制。更好地描述这种影响可能有助于为减少城乡癌症差距的政策提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba9/10935886/61d88af19bac/CAM4-13-e7058-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba9/10935886/61d88af19bac/CAM4-13-e7058-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba9/10935886/61d88af19bac/CAM4-13-e7058-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Urban relatives ameliorate survival disparities for genitourinary cancer in rural patients.城市亲属改善农村患者泌尿生殖系统癌症的生存差距。
Cancer Med. 2024 Mar;13(5):e7058. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7058.
2
Rural-urban disparities in colorectal cancer survival and risk among men in Utah: a statewide population-based study.犹他州男性结直肠癌生存和风险的城乡差异:全州人群为基础的研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2020 Mar;31(3):241-253. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01268-2. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Disparities in cancer survival and incidence by metropolitan versus rural residence in Utah.犹他州癌症存活率和发病率的城乡差异。
Cancer Med. 2018 Apr;7(4):1490-1497. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1382. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Genitourinary cancer and family: The reverberating psychological and cardiovascular effects of a genitourinary cancer diagnosis on first-degree relatives and spouses.泌尿生殖系统癌症与家庭:泌尿生殖系统癌症诊断对一级亲属和配偶的心理和心血管的影响。
Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;130(23):4061-4070. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35486. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
5
Mammography Among Women Residing in Urban Versus Rural Utah: Breast Cancer Survival.居住在犹他州城市与农村地区的女性的乳腺钼靶检查:乳腺癌生存率
Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(24):e70505. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70505.
6
Associations between geographic residence and US adolescent and young adult cancer stage and survival.地理居住环境与美国青少年和年轻成人癌症分期和生存的关联。
Cancer. 2021 Oct 1;127(19):3640-3650. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33667. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
7
Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival: a statewide population-based study.农村-城市间卵巢癌生存差异:全州范围基于人群的研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):377-384. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Rural/urban residence and childhood and adolescent cancer survival in the United States.农村/城市居住与美国儿童和青少年癌症生存状况。
Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;125(2):261-268. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31704. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
9
Rural-urban disparities in mortality and geriatric assessment among older adults with cancer: The cancer & aging resilience evaluation (CARE) registry.城乡老年人癌症死亡率和老年评估差异:癌症与衰老韧性评估(CARE)登记处。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 May;14(4):101505. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101505. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
10
Rurality and pediatric cancer survival in the United States: An analysis of SEER data from 2000 to 2021.美国农村地区与儿童癌症生存率:对2000年至2021年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据的分析
Cancer Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;94:102705. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102705. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
"We are the sun for our community:" Partnering with community health workers/promotores to adapt, deliver and evaluate a home-based collaborative care model to improve equity in access to quality depression care for older U.S. Latino adults who are underserved.“我们是社区的太阳”:与社区卫生工作者/ promotores 合作,以适应、提供和评估一种基于家庭的协作护理模式,以改善服务不足的美国老年拉丁裔成年人获得优质抑郁症护理的公平性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;11:1079319. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1079319. eCollection 2023.
2
How cancer programs identify and address the financial burdens of rural cancer patients.癌症项目如何识别和解决农村癌症患者的经济负担。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Mar;30(3):2047-2058. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06577-z. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
3
Effect of family support on quality of postoperative life in patients with digestive cancer.家庭支持对消化道癌症患者术后生活质量的影响。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;9(4):2072-2078. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1129. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Rural Cancer Disparities in the United States: A Multilevel Framework to Improve Access to Care and Patient Outcomes.美国农村地区的癌症差异:一个改善医疗服务可及性和患者治疗效果的多层次框架。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Jul;16(7):409-413. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00352. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
Geographic Distribution and Survival Outcomes for Rural Patients With Cancer Treated in Clinical Trials.农村癌症患者临床试验治疗的地理分布和生存结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1235.
6
An Overview of the National Cancer Institute's Initiatives to Accelerate Rural Cancer Control Research.美国国立癌症研究所加速农村癌症控制研究计划概述
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Nov;27(11):1240-1244. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0934.
7
Predictors and interdependence of family support in a random sample of long-term young breast cancer survivors and their biological relatives.在一个随机抽样的长期年轻乳腺癌幸存者及其生物学亲属的样本中,家庭支持的预测因素及其相互依赖性。
Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):4980-4992. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1766. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Rural-Urban Differences in Cancer Incidence and Trends in the United States.城乡癌症发病率差异及美国的发病趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Nov;27(11):1265-1274. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0430. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
9
Making the Case for Investment in Rural Cancer Control: An Analysis of Rural Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Funding Trends.为农村癌症控制投资提供依据:对农村癌症发病率、死亡率及资金趋势的分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):992-997. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
10
Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA.揭示美国农村地区医疗保健获取的一些重要障碍。
Public Health. 2015 Jun;129(6):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 27.