• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混血面孔提供了成功的群体间接触的视觉线索:基因混合和联盟检测。

Biracial Faces Offer Visual Cues of Successful Intergroup Contact: Genetic Admixture and Coalition Detection.

机构信息

Applied Psychology Division, School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China.

Psychology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2024 Jan-Mar;22(1):14747049241238623. doi: 10.1177/14747049241238623.

DOI:10.1177/14747049241238623
PMID:38477637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10938625/
Abstract

This research explores how biracial facial cues affect racial perception and social judgment. We tested a coalition-signaling hypothesis of biracial cues in two studies conducted in the United States ( = 227) and China ( = 116). From the perspective of intergroup and interpersonal relations theories in social psychology, biracial features would likely be perceived as cues of threat or resource competition. In contrast, we propose an evolutionary hypothesis that biracial facial cues reveal the ancestral history of intergroup alliances between members of two races or ethnic groups. When racial cues are mixed, we predict that biracial individuals may be viewed more positively than other-race or even own-race members who often compete for limited ingroup resources. The participants observed facial images that ranged from 100% Asian to 100% Caucasian, including morphed biracial composites of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% Caucasian or Asian. The participants evaluated each image regarding perceived Caucasianness (Asianness), attractiveness, trustworthiness, health, intelligence, and career prospects. The US and Chinese samples yielded a similar pattern of own-race bias in racial perception and biracial favoritism in social judgment. The social judgment ratings were not correlated with the racial perception scores and were independent of the sex of the participants or biracial images, indicating a coalitional motive, instead of a mating motive, underlying social perception of biracial individuals. Overall, the results suggest that biracial facial features signal a successful genetic admixture and coalition in parental generations and thus increase the trustworthiness and cooperative potential of a biracial person.

摘要

本研究探讨了双种族面部特征如何影响种族认知和社会判断。我们在美国( = 227)和中国( = 116)进行的两项研究中测试了一个关于双种族线索的联合信号假说。从社会心理学中群体间和人际关系理论的角度来看,双种族特征可能被视为威胁或资源竞争的线索。相比之下,我们提出了一个进化假说,即双种族面部特征揭示了两个种族或族群成员之间的群体间联盟的祖先历史。当种族线索混合时,我们预测双种族个体可能比其他种族甚至自己种族的成员更受正面看待,因为后者常常为有限的内群体资源而竞争。参与者观察了从 100%亚洲到 100%高加索的面部图像,包括 30%、40%、50%、60%和 70%高加索或亚洲的混合双种族合成图像。参与者根据感知的高加索人(亚洲人)、吸引力、可信度、健康、智力和职业前景来评价每个图像。美国和中国的样本都表现出种族认知中的本族偏见和社会判断中的双种族偏好的相似模式。社会判断评分与种族认知评分不相关,且与参与者或双种族图像的性别无关,这表明社会对双种族个体的感知背后是一种联合动机,而不是交配动机。总的来说,结果表明,双种族面部特征标志着父母一代中成功的基因混合和联盟,从而增加了双种族个体的可信度和合作潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb99/10938625/fab779b4c6db/10.1177_14747049241238623-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb99/10938625/656d6d610dab/10.1177_14747049241238623-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb99/10938625/670e2238efe9/10.1177_14747049241238623-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb99/10938625/fab779b4c6db/10.1177_14747049241238623-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb99/10938625/656d6d610dab/10.1177_14747049241238623-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb99/10938625/670e2238efe9/10.1177_14747049241238623-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb99/10938625/fab779b4c6db/10.1177_14747049241238623-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Biracial Faces Offer Visual Cues of Successful Intergroup Contact: Genetic Admixture and Coalition Detection.混血面孔提供了成功的群体间接触的视觉线索:基因混合和联盟检测。
Evol Psychol. 2024 Jan-Mar;22(1):14747049241238623. doi: 10.1177/14747049241238623.
2
Similarities and differences in Chinese and Caucasian adults' use of facial cues for trustworthiness judgments.中文和高加索成年人在使用面部线索判断可信度方面的相似性和差异。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034859. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
3
Exposure to Biracial Faces Reduces Colorblindness.接触混血面孔可减少色盲。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;45(1):54-66. doi: 10.1177/0146167218778012. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
4
Hypodescent or ingroup overexclusion?: Children's and adults' racial categorization of ambiguous black/white biracial faces.低等血统还是内群体过度排斥?儿童和成人对模棱两可的黑白混血面孔的种族分类
Dev Sci. 2024 Mar;27(2):e13450. doi: 10.1111/desc.13450. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Racial Prejudice Affects Representations of Facial Trustworthiness.种族偏见影响面部可信度的呈现。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;35(3):263-276. doi: 10.1177/09567976231225094. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
6
Children's cross-cultural categorizations of racially ambiguous faces in Taiwan and the U.S.台湾和美国儿童对种族模糊面孔的跨文化分类
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2023 Jul;29(3):385-396. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000513. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces.本族、异族和混血面孔的吸引力。
Perception. 2005;34(3):319-40. doi: 10.1068/p5191.
8
Blacks' perception of a Biracial's ingroup membership shapes attributions to discrimination following social rejection.黑人对双种族成员的群体认同感知会影响他们在遭受社会排斥后的歧视归因。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2019 Oct;25(4):483-493. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000267. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
Multiracial faces: How categorization affects memory at the boundaries of race.多种族面孔:种族边界处的分类如何影响记忆。
J Soc Issues. 2009 Mar 1;65(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01588.x.
10
Biracial perception in black and white: How Black and White perceivers respond to phenotype and racial identity cues.黑白间的混血儿认知:黑人和白人感知者如何对表型和种族认同线索做出反应。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2017 Jan;23(1):154-164. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000103. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Introducing the Sociopolitical Motive × Intergroup Threat Model to Understand How Monoracial Perceivers' Sociopolitical Motives Influence Their Categorization of Multiracial People.引入社会政治动机×群体间威胁模型,以了解单种族知觉者的社会政治动机如何影响他们对多种族人群的分类。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Aug;24(3):260-286. doi: 10.1177/1088868320917051. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
The Genetics of Human Skin and Hair Pigmentation.人类皮肤和头发色素沉着的遗传学。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2019 Aug 31;20:41-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015230. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
At face value: Psychological outcomes differ for real vs. computer-generated multiracial faces.
表面上看:真实与计算机生成的多种族面孔的心理结果不同。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(5):592-610. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1538929. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Whose Side Are You On? Asian Americans' Mistrust of Asian-White Biracials Predicts More Exclusion From the Ingroup.你站在哪一边?亚裔美国人对亚白混血儿的不信任,预示着他们将更多地被排斥在群体之外。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;45(6):827-841. doi: 10.1177/0146167218798032. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
5
Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations.不同人类群体中身高和认知能力的方向性优势。
Nature. 2015 Jul 23;523(7561):459-462. doi: 10.1038/nature14618. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system.政治认知的构成要素:种族、政党政治与联盟检测系统。
Cognition. 2015 Jul;140:24-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
7
Economic scarcity alters the perception of race.经济匮乏改变了人们对种族的看法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 24;111(25):9079-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404448111. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
8
The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.种族偏见的代价:最后通牒博弈中的群体间谈判。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2498-504. doi: 10.1177/0956797613496435. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Eye-tracking the own-race bias in face recognition: revealing the perceptual and socio-cognitive mechanisms.眼动追踪人脸识别中的本族偏见:揭示感知和社会认知机制。
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):586-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
10
Does this recession make me look black? The effect of resource scarcity on the categorization of biracial faces.这场衰退让我看起来像黑人吗?资源稀缺对混血面孔分类的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Dec;23(12):1476-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797612450892. Epub 2012 Oct 19.