• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于依恋风格的妊娠期糖尿病认知特征:一项横断面研究。

Gestational diabetes perception profiles based on attachment style: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Acta Diabetol. 2024 Jun;61(6):773-780. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02251-y. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00592-024-02251-y
PMID:38478077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11101504/
Abstract

AIMS

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is a prevalent complication in pregnancy that requires effective self-management, which can be influenced by illness perceptions. Moreover, behavioral regulation can be affected by attachment styles. Thus, our study aimed to identify common GDM perception profiles and test their association with attachment styles.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 446 women completed the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), and additional items about GDM diagnosis, information, competence, adherence, behavioral change. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to determine GDM perception profiles. Multinomial logistic regression followed to calculate the association between GDM perception profiles and attachment styles.

RESULTS

Three distinct profiles emerged: coping (n = 172, 38.6%)-characterized by the most positive GDM perception, burdened (n = 222, 49.8%)-indicating the emotional burden of the disease, and resourceless (n = 52, 11.7%)-reporting lack of resources (i.e. information, competence). Women with insecure attachment styles were more likely to develop a burdened GDM perception profile. Specifically, the expression of a fearful (OR = 1.184 [95%CI: 1.03; 1.36], p = 0.016) and a preoccupied (OR = 1.154 [95%CI: 1.01; 1.32], p = 0.037) attachment style increased the likelihood for a burdened perception profile, while a secure attachment style (OR = 10.791 [95%CI: 0.65; 0.96], p = 0.017) decreased likelihood for developing resourceless GDM perception profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Three GDM perception profiles were identified and the role of attachment styles in shaping these perceptions was confirmed. Further studies are needed to investigate whether a tailored treatment approach based on the predominant attachment style could lead to more positive GDM perceptions, improved glycemic control, and better perinatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

妊娠糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的妊娠并发症,需要有效的自我管理,而这可能受到疾病认知的影响。此外,行为调节可能受到依恋类型的影响。因此,我们的研究旨在确定常见的 GDM 认知特征,并检验其与依恋类型的关系。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,446 名女性完成了关系问卷(RQ)、简短疾病认知问卷(BIPQ)以及关于 GDM 诊断、信息、能力、依从性、行为改变的其他项目。采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)确定 GDM 认知特征。采用多项逻辑回归计算 GDM 认知特征与依恋类型之间的关联。

结果

出现了三个不同的特征:应对(n=172,38.6%)-表现出最积极的 GDM 认知,负担(n=222,49.8%)-表示疾病的情绪负担,以及无资源(n=52,11.7%)-报告缺乏资源(即信息、能力)。依恋风格不安全感的女性更有可能出现负担型 GDM 认知特征。具体来说,表现出恐惧(OR=1.184[95%CI:1.03;1.36],p=0.016)和专注(OR=1.154[95%CI:1.01;1.32],p=0.037)依恋风格增加了负担型认知特征的可能性,而安全的依恋风格(OR=10.791[95%CI:0.65;0.96],p=0.017)降低了出现资源不足型 GDM 认知特征的可能性。

结论

确定了三种 GDM 认知特征,并证实了依恋风格在塑造这些认知中的作用。需要进一步研究以探讨基于主要依恋风格的个体化治疗方法是否可以导致更积极的 GDM 认知、改善血糖控制和更好的围产期结局。

相似文献

1
Gestational diabetes perception profiles based on attachment style: a cross-sectional study.基于依恋风格的妊娠期糖尿病认知特征:一项横断面研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Jun;61(6):773-780. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02251-y. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Are levels of coping with stress in pregnancy with gestational diabetes worse than in healthy pregnancy?妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的压力应对水平是否比健康孕妇更差?
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jun;40(2):114-122. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2018.1438404. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
3
There's no sugar-coating psychological distress and illness perceptions in gestational diabetes mellitus: depression and anxiety are associated with negative illness perceptions.妊娠期糖尿病患者的心理困扰和疾病认知不容美化:抑郁和焦虑与消极的疾病认知有关。
Australas Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(1):64-69. doi: 10.1177/10398562211038910. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
Insecure attachment style is associated with chronic widespread pain.不安全依恋风格与慢性广泛性疼痛有关。
Pain. 2009 Jun;143(3):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
5
Positive and negative affect, life satisfaction, and coping with stress by attachment styles in Turkish students.土耳其学生的正负性情感、生活满意度以及依恋风格对应激的应对方式
Psychol Rep. 2010 Oct;107(2):480-90. doi: 10.2466/02.09.10.20.PR0.107.5.480-490.
6
Stress and coping in hospice nursing staff. The impact of attachment styles.临终关怀护理人员的压力与应对。依恋风格的影响。
Psychooncology. 2007 Jun;16(6):563-72. doi: 10.1002/pon.1064.
7
Satisfaction with diagnosis process for gestational diabetes mellitus and risk perception among Australian women.澳大利亚女性对妊娠期糖尿病诊断过程的满意度及风险认知
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;129(1):46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.033. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
8
Hypersexual behavior and attachment styles in a non-clinical sample: The mediation role of depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms.非临床样本中的性欲过度行为和依恋风格:抑郁和创伤后应激症状的中介作用。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.064. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
9
An explanatory model of adjustment to type I diabetes based on attachment, coping, and self-regulation theories.基于依恋、应对和自我调节理论的 I 型糖尿病适应解释模型。
Psychol Health Med. 2012;17(1):47-58. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.575168. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
10
Comparison of pregnancy mood profiles in gestational diabetes and preexisting diabetes.妊娠期糖尿病和孕前糖尿病患者孕期情绪状况的比较。
Diabetes Educ. 2000 Jul-Aug;26(4):667-72. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600414.

本文引用的文献

1
Illness perception profiles and psychological and physical symptoms in newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer.初诊晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疾病感知特征与心理和生理症状。
Health Psychol. 2022 Jun;41(6):379-388. doi: 10.1037/hea0001192.
2
Illness representations and psychological outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的疾病认知与心理结局。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 May;27(2):553-570. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12562. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
The psychosocial challenges associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of qualitative studies.
与妊娠期糖尿病相关的心理社会挑战:定性研究的系统评价
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Feb;16(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
4
There's no sugar-coating psychological distress and illness perceptions in gestational diabetes mellitus: depression and anxiety are associated with negative illness perceptions.妊娠期糖尿病患者的心理困扰和疾病认知不容美化:抑郁和焦虑与消极的疾病认知有关。
Australas Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(1):64-69. doi: 10.1177/10398562211038910. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Latent profile transition analyses and growth mixture models: A very non-technical guide for researchers in child and adolescent development.潜在剖面转换分析与增长混合模型:给儿童与青少年发展领域研究人员的一份通俗易懂的指南。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2021 Jan;2021(175):111-139. doi: 10.1002/cad.20398. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
6
The common sense model of illness self-regulation: a conceptual review and proposed extended model.疾病自我调节的常识模型:概念综述与扩展模型建议
Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Sep;16(3):347-377. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1878050. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
7
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
8
Common sense model of self-regulation for understanding adherence and quality of life in type 2 diabetes with structural equation modeling.基于结构方程模型的2型糖尿病自我管理常识模型,用于理解依从性和生活质量
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
9
The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995-2015.教育对健康的影响:对经合组织国家1995 - 2015年期间的实证评估
Arch Public Health. 2020 Apr 6;78:20. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00402-5. eCollection 2020.
10
A systematic review of illness representation clusters in chronic conditions.慢性疾病中疾病表现聚类的系统评价
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Jun;43(3):241-254. doi: 10.1002/nur.22013. Epub 2020 Feb 17.