• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于轴标注的深度神经网络自动估计拇外翻角。

Automatic estimation of hallux valgus angle using deep neural network with axis-based annotation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

Department of Preventive Medicine for Locomotive Organ Disorders, 22Nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Nov;53(11):2357-2366. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04618-2. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00256-024-04618-2
PMID:38478080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410836/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We developed the deep neural network (DNN) model to automatically measure hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) on foot radiographs. The objective is to assess the accuracy of the model by comparing to the manual measurement of foot and ankle surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A DNN was developed to predict the bone axes of the first proximal phalanx and all metatarsals from the first to the fifth in foot radiographs. The dataset used for model development consisted of 1798 radiographs collected from a population-based cohort and patients at our foot and ankle clinic. The retrospective validation cohort comprised of 92 radiographs obtained from 92 consecutive patients visiting our foot and ankle clinic. The mean absolute error (MAE) between automatic measurements by the model and the median of manual measurements by three foot and ankle surgeons was compared to 3° using one-tailed t-test and was also compared to the inter-rater difference in manual measurements among the three surgeons using two-tailed paired t-test.

RESULTS

The MAE for HVA was 1.3° (upper limit of 95% CI 1.6°), and this was significantly smaller than the inter-rater difference of 2.0 ± 0.2° among the surgeons, demonstrating the superior accuracy of the model. In contrast, the MAE for IMA was 0.8° (upper limit of 95% CI 1.0°) that showed no significant difference from the inter-rater difference of 1.0 ± 0.1° among the surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Our model demonstrated the ability to measure the HVA and IMA with an accuracy comparable to that of specialists.

摘要

目的

我们开发了深度神经网络(DNN)模型,以自动测量足部 X 光片中的拇外翻角(HVA)和跖骨间角(IMA)。目的是通过与足部和踝关节外科医生的手动测量进行比较来评估该模型的准确性。

材料与方法

开发了一个 DNN 来预测足部 X 光片中第一近节趾骨和所有跖骨从第一到第五的骨轴。用于模型开发的数据集中包含了来自基于人群的队列和我们的足踝诊所患者的 1798 张 X 光片。回顾性验证队列由来自我们足踝诊所的 92 名连续患者的 92 张 X 光片组成。模型自动测量与三名足踝外科医生手动测量中位数之间的平均绝对误差(MAE)与单侧 t 检验相比为 3°,与三名外科医生手动测量中的组内差异相比也为双侧配对 t 检验。

结果

HVA 的 MAE 为 1.3°(95%CI 上限为 1.6°),明显小于外科医生之间的组内差异 2.0±0.2°,表明模型的准确性更高。相比之下,IMA 的 MAE 为 0.8°(95%CI 上限为 1.0°),与外科医生之间的组内差异 1.0±0.1°无显著差异。

结论

我们的模型证明了以与专家相当的准确性测量 HVA 和 IMA 的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/f73137fb1468/256_2024_4618_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/e7d7eda8b595/256_2024_4618_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/b141172ec926/256_2024_4618_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/2ac43e4210b9/256_2024_4618_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/1ef133fc01a8/256_2024_4618_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/951099f5594f/256_2024_4618_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/f73137fb1468/256_2024_4618_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/e7d7eda8b595/256_2024_4618_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/b141172ec926/256_2024_4618_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/2ac43e4210b9/256_2024_4618_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/1ef133fc01a8/256_2024_4618_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/951099f5594f/256_2024_4618_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46af/11410836/f73137fb1468/256_2024_4618_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Automatic estimation of hallux valgus angle using deep neural network with axis-based annotation.基于轴标注的深度神经网络自动估计拇外翻角。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Nov;53(11):2357-2366. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04618-2. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
The Effect of Incorrect Foot Placement on the Accuracy of Radiographic Measurements of the Hallux Valgus and Inter-Metatarsal Angles for Treating Hallux Valgus.不正确的足部位置对拇外翻及跖间角X线测量准确性在治疗拇外翻中的影响
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(3):196-201.
3
An interpretable deep learning model for hallux valgus prediction.一种用于拇外翻预测的可解释深度学习模型。
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Feb;185:109468. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109468. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
4
Intra- and Interobserver Agreement in Hallux Valgus Angle Measurements on Weightbearing and Non-Weightbearing Radiographs.负重与非负重X线片上拇外翻角测量的观察者内及观察者间一致性
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jul;58(4):706-712. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.032.
5
Evaluation of hallux valgus treatment: is classical angular correction approach relevant?拇外翻治疗的评估:经典角度矫正方法是否相关?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 12;145(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05674-y.
6
Feasibility study of hallux valgus measurement with a deep convolutional neural network based on landmark detection.基于地标检测的深度卷积神经网络测量拇外翻的可行性研究
Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Jun;51(6):1235-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03939-w. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
Effects of Single-Foot Centered and Double-Foot Centered X-ray Projection on Hallux Valgus Measurement.单足和双足中心 X 射线投影对拇外翻测量的影响。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):94-99. doi: 10.1111/os.12588. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
First metatarsal proximal opening wedge osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus deformity: comparison of straight versus oblique osteotomy.第一跖骨近端开放性楔形截骨术矫正拇外翻畸形:直形截骨与斜形截骨的比较
Yonsei Med J. 2015 May;56(3):744-52. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.744.
9
Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program.拇外翻的影像学角度:手动测量与计算机程序测量之间的差异。
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Mar;27(3):175-80. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700304.
10
Utilization of the Modified Lapidus Procedure for Correction of Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity With Increased Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle.采用改良Lapidus手术矫正中度至重度拇外翻畸形并增加跖骨远端关节角
Foot Ankle Spec. 2024 Aug;17(4):352-357. doi: 10.1177/19386400221093859. Epub 2022 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-Powered Smartphone Application for Measuring Hallux Valgus Angle From Radiographs Displayed on a Monitor.用于从显示器上显示的X光片测量拇外翻角度的人工智能驱动的智能手机应用程序。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Sep;18(3):e70081. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70081.
2
HVAngleEst: A Dataset for End-to-end Automated Hallux Valgus Angle Measurement from X-Ray Images.HVAngleEst:一个用于从X射线图像进行端到端自动拇外翻角度测量的数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 May 30;12(1):915. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05261-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between medial partite hallux sesamoid and hallux valgus in the general population.人群中拇囊炎和拇外翻的内侧籽骨的关系。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Dec;29(8):621-626. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Development of a scoring model for the Sharp/van der Heijde score using convolutional neural networks and its clinical application.利用卷积神经网络开发 Sharp/van der Heijde 评分的评分模型及其临床应用。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Jun 1;62(6):2272-2283. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac586.
3
Comparison of outcomes of different osteotomy sites for hallux valgus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
不同截骨部位治疗拇外翻的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022 May-Aug;30(2):10225536221110473. doi: 10.1177/10225536221110473.
4
The discrepancy between radiographically-assessed and self-recognized hallux valgus in a large population-based cohort.在一个大型基于人群的队列中,放射评估与自我认知的拇外翻之间的差异。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 4;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04978-z.
5
Feasibility study of hallux valgus measurement with a deep convolutional neural network based on landmark detection.基于地标检测的深度卷积神经网络测量拇外翻的可行性研究
Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Jun;51(6):1235-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03939-w. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
6
Statistical parametric mapping of biomechanical one-dimensional data with Bayesian inference.基于贝叶斯推理的生物力学一维数据统计参数映射
Int Biomech. 2019 Dec;6(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/23335432.2019.1597643.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint disorders. Section 1: Hallux valgus.第一跖趾关节疾病的诊断与治疗。第1节:拇外翻。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003 May-Jun;42(3):112-23. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(03)70014-3.
8
Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements.拇外翻畸形评估中的角度测量:美国矫形足踝协会角度测量特别委员会报告
Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Jan;23(1):68-74. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300114.
9
Roger A. Mann Award . The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities.罗杰·A·曼恩奖。拇外翻畸形角度测量的可靠性。
Foot Ankle Int. 2001 May;22(5):369-79. doi: 10.1177/107110070102200503.
10
Hallux valgus--etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations.拇外翻——病因、解剖结构、治疗及手术考量
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Jun(157):31-41.