Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Vienna Doctoral School Cognition, Behavior and Neuroscience, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J Pers Assess. 2024 Nov-Dec;106(6):787-797. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2316236. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
Alterations in interoception have been linked to psychopathology. Recent findings suggest that both the attention to and the accuracy of, interoceptive perceptions may be oppositely related to subclinical symptomatology. Thus, providing well-validated tools that tap into these interoceptive processes is crucial for understanding the relation between interoceptive processing and subclinical psychopathology. In the current study ( = 642), we aimed to (1) validate the German version of the Interoceptive Attention Scale (IATS; Gabriele et al., 2022), and (2) test the differential association of self-reported interoceptive attention and accuracy with subclinical symptomatology, including alexithymia, depressive, and anxious symptomatology. We observed that a one-factor solution is a well-fitting model for the IATS. Further, the IATS showed good internal consistency, convergent, and divergent validity, but poor test-retest reliability. Self-reported interoceptive attention and accuracy were unrelated to each other. However, IATS scores were positively related to all measures of psychopathology (except depressive symptomatology), whereas self-reported interoceptive accuracy scores showed negative or nonsignificant relations with these. Our data suggest that the IATS is a good instrument to measure self-report interoceptive attention in the German population. Further, we highlight the need to distinguish between constructs of interoception to better understand the relation between interoception and psychopathology.
内脏感知的改变与精神病理学有关。最近的研究结果表明,对内脏感知的注意和准确性可能与亚临床症状呈相反的关系。因此,提供经过良好验证的工具来挖掘这些内脏感知过程对于理解内脏感知处理与亚临床精神病理学之间的关系至关重要。在本研究中(n=642),我们旨在(1)验证内脏注意量表(IATS)的德文版本(Gabriele 等人,2022),以及(2)测试自我报告的内脏注意和准确性与亚临床症状之间的差异关联,包括述情障碍、抑郁和焦虑症状。我们观察到,单因素模型是 IATS 的一个很好的拟合模型。此外,IATS 表现出良好的内部一致性、收敛和区分效度,但测试-重测信度较差。自我报告的内脏注意和准确性彼此之间没有关系。然而,IATS 分数与所有精神病理学测量指标(除了抑郁症状)呈正相关,而自我报告的内脏准确性分数与这些指标呈负相关或无显著相关。我们的数据表明,IATS 是测量德国人群自我报告内脏注意的良好工具。此外,我们强调需要区分内脏感知的结构,以更好地理解内脏感知与精神病理学之间的关系。