Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1Y2, Canada.
Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1Y2, Canada.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105893. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105893. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
A total of 76 children (M = 9 years 5 months, SD = 2.22 years) participated in a structured interview about their experiences with and knowledge of academic dishonesty. Overall, 27% of the sample reported having cheated in school. Most of these children were 10 to 13 years old, and the most prevalent form of cheating behavior reported was using forbidden materials during a test. Children's age group was a significant positive predictor of their reported cheating history; however, no significant difference was found between children's gender and engagement with cheating. Children's moral evaluations of cheating did not predict their reported cheating history, nor did children's parents' cheating history. Vignette type (cheating vs. non-cheating), age group, and the interaction between vignette type and age group were significant predictors of children's ability to accurately identify behaviors that constitute cheating. Children rated cheating behaviors as significantly less moral than non-cheating behaviors. Overall, the current results provide insight into what forms of cheating behavior children engage in at the elementary school-age level.
共有 76 名儿童(M=9 岁 5 个月,SD=2.22 年)参与了一项关于他们在学术不诚实方面的经历和知识的结构化访谈。总体而言,27%的样本报告在学校作弊。这些孩子大多在 10 到 13 岁之间,报告的最常见作弊行为是在考试中使用禁止的材料。儿童的年龄组是其作弊报告历史的显著正预测因素;然而,儿童的性别和参与作弊之间没有发现显著差异。儿童对作弊的道德评价并不能预测他们的作弊报告历史,也不能预测他们父母的作弊历史。情境类型(作弊与非作弊)、年龄组以及情境类型和年龄组之间的相互作用是儿童准确识别构成作弊的行为的能力的显著预测因素。儿童认为作弊行为的道德性明显低于非作弊行为。总的来说,目前的结果提供了一些关于儿童在小学阶段参与的作弊行为形式的见解。