Suppr超能文献

小学生对学术不诚实的看法:对学校作弊行为的定义和道德评价。

Elementary school-aged children's perceptions of academic dishonesty: Definitions and moral evaluations of cheating behaviors in school.

机构信息

Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1Y2, Canada.

Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1Y2, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105893. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105893. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Abstract

A total of 76 children (M = 9 years 5 months, SD = 2.22 years) participated in a structured interview about their experiences with and knowledge of academic dishonesty. Overall, 27% of the sample reported having cheated in school. Most of these children were 10 to 13 years old, and the most prevalent form of cheating behavior reported was using forbidden materials during a test. Children's age group was a significant positive predictor of their reported cheating history; however, no significant difference was found between children's gender and engagement with cheating. Children's moral evaluations of cheating did not predict their reported cheating history, nor did children's parents' cheating history. Vignette type (cheating vs. non-cheating), age group, and the interaction between vignette type and age group were significant predictors of children's ability to accurately identify behaviors that constitute cheating. Children rated cheating behaviors as significantly less moral than non-cheating behaviors. Overall, the current results provide insight into what forms of cheating behavior children engage in at the elementary school-age level.

摘要

共有 76 名儿童(M=9 岁 5 个月,SD=2.22 年)参与了一项关于他们在学术不诚实方面的经历和知识的结构化访谈。总体而言,27%的样本报告在学校作弊。这些孩子大多在 10 到 13 岁之间,报告的最常见作弊行为是在考试中使用禁止的材料。儿童的年龄组是其作弊报告历史的显著正预测因素;然而,儿童的性别和参与作弊之间没有发现显著差异。儿童对作弊的道德评价并不能预测他们的作弊报告历史,也不能预测他们父母的作弊历史。情境类型(作弊与非作弊)、年龄组以及情境类型和年龄组之间的相互作用是儿童准确识别构成作弊的行为的能力的显著预测因素。儿童认为作弊行为的道德性明显低于非作弊行为。总的来说,目前的结果提供了一些关于儿童在小学阶段参与的作弊行为形式的见解。

相似文献

1
Elementary school-aged children's perceptions of academic dishonesty: Definitions and moral evaluations of cheating behaviors in school.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105893. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105893. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Aug;244:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105948. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Elementary school children's cheating behavior and its cognitive correlates.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 May;121:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
4
Effects of test difficulty messaging on academic cheating among middle school children.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Aug;220:105417. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105417. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Predictors of children's prosocial lie-telling: Motivation, socialization variables, and moral understanding.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Nov;110(3):373-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
Perceptions of Dishonesty: Understanding Parents' Reports of and Influence on Children and Adolescents' Lie-Telling.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jan;49(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01153-5. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Academic cheating in early childhood: Role of age, gender, personality, and self-efficacy.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105888. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105888. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
10
A cross-cultural comparison of the relation between children's moral standards of honesty and their lie-telling behavior.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Jul;231:105665. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105665. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验