• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童期作弊行为:探究父母报告的问题行为与模拟学术测试中的不诚实行为之间的联系。

Cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada.

Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Aug;244:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105948. Epub 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105948
PMID:38754332
Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between parental reports of children's behavioral problems and their cheating behaviors on simulated academic tests, addressing a significant gap in understanding early childhood academic cheating and its potential links to broader behavioral issues. We hypothesized that children's early problem behaviors would be predictive of their academic cheating. To test these hypotheses, children aged 4 to 12 years took part in six unmonitored academic tests that measured their cheating behaviors while their parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire elsewhere. Separate hierarchical linear regressions revealed that children's problem behaviors, as reported by parents, overall significantly predict children's cheating behaviors even after accounting for demographic variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, and parental religiosity. Specifically, the Conduct Problems subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire showed a significant and unique association with children's cheating behaviors above and beyond the common contributions of all predictors. However, the Child Behavior Checklist scores and the scores on the other Strengths and Difficulties subscales were not significantly or uniquely related to cheating. These findings offer new insight into simulated childhood academic cheating and its relation to problem behaviors observed by parents.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨父母报告的儿童行为问题与他们在模拟学术测试中的作弊行为之间的关系,旨在填补对儿童早期学术作弊及其与更广泛行为问题之间潜在联系的理解空白。我们假设儿童早期的问题行为会预测他们的学术作弊行为。为了检验这些假设,4 至 12 岁的儿童参加了六次无人监督的学术测试,在这些测试中,他们的作弊行为得到了测量,而他们的父母则在其他地方完成了《儿童行为检查表》和《长处与困难问卷》。独立分层线性回归显示,即使考虑了年龄、性别、种族和父母宗教信仰等人口统计学变量,父母报告的儿童问题行为总体上显著预测了儿童的作弊行为。具体来说,《长处与困难问卷》中的行为问题子量表在所有预测因素的共同贡献之外,与儿童的作弊行为存在显著而独特的关联。然而,《儿童行为检查表》的得分以及其他《长处与困难问卷》子量表的得分与作弊行为没有显著或独特的关系。这些发现为模拟儿童学术作弊及其与父母观察到的问题行为之间的关系提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests.儿童期作弊行为:探究父母报告的问题行为与模拟学术测试中的不诚实行为之间的联系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Aug;244:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105948. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Elementary school-aged children's perceptions of academic dishonesty: Definitions and moral evaluations of cheating behaviors in school.小学生对学术不诚实的看法:对学校作弊行为的定义和道德评价。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105893. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105893. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
The role of theory of mind and social skills in predicting children's cheating.心智理论和社会技能在预测儿童欺骗行为中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Mar;179:337-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.018. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
Academic cheating in early childhood: Role of age, gender, personality, and self-efficacy.幼儿期的学术作弊:年龄、性别、个性和自我效能的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105888. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105888. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
5
Buffering effect of parental engagement on the relationship between corporal punishment and children's emotional/behavioral problems.父母参与对体罚与儿童情绪/行为问题之间关系的缓冲作用。
Pediatr Int. 2015 Jun;57(3):385-92. doi: 10.1111/ped.12604.
6
Elementary school children's cheating behavior and its cognitive correlates.小学生的作弊行为及其认知相关因素。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 May;121:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
Young children with higher verbal intelligence are less likely to cheat.语言智力较高的幼儿不太可能作弊。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Aug;244:105933. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105933. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
8
Comparing the Predictive Utility of Parent and Teacher Reports of Externalizing Behaviors on Concurrent Academic Achievement in Preschool-Aged Children.比较父母和教师报告的外化行为对学龄前儿童同期学业成就的预测效用。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 May;52(5):789-802. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01144-y. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
9
Self-efficacy and cheating among young children.幼儿的自我效能感与作弊行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 May;241:105843. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105843. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
10
Patterns of parental emotion-related discourse and links with children's problem behaviors: A person-centered approach.父母情绪相关话语模式与儿童问题行为的关系:一种以个体为中心的方法。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Nov;54(11):2077-2089. doi: 10.1037/dev0000602. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Dataset of cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests.童年期作弊数据集:探究父母报告的问题行为与模拟学术测试中的不诚实行为之间的联系。
Data Brief. 2024 Oct 25;57:111072. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.111072. eCollection 2024 Dec.