• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化急诊科下腰痛患者的知情药物处方(RIME):一项对照中断时间序列实施研究方案。

Reinforcing informed medication prescription for low back pain in the emergency department (RIME): a controlled interrupted time series implementation study protocol.

机构信息

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e082668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082668.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082668
PMID:38479733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10936499/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Management guidelines for low back pain (LBP) recommend exclusion of serious pathology, followed by simple analgesics, superficial heat therapy, early mobilisation and patient education. An audit in a large metropolitan hospital emergency department (ED) revealed high rates of non-recommended medication prescription for LBP (65% of patients prescribed opioids, 17% prescribed benzodiazepines), high inpatient admission rates (20% of ED LBP patients), delayed patient mobilisation (on average 6 hours) and inadequate patient education (48% of patients). This study aims to improve medication prescription for LBP in this ED by implementing an intervention shown previously to improve guideline-based management of LBP in other Australian EDs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A controlled interrupted time series study will evaluate the intervention in the ED before (24 weeks; 20 March 2023-3 September 2023) and after (24 weeks; 27 November 2024-12 May 2024) implementation (12 weeks; 4 September 2023-26 November 2023), additionally comparing findings with another ED in the same health service. The multicomponent implementation strategy uses a formalised clinical flow chart to support clinical decision-making and aims to change clinician behaviour, through clinician education, provision of alternative treatments, educational resources, audit and feedback, supported by implementation champions. The primary outcome is the percentage of LBP patients prescribed non-recommended medications (opioids, benzodiazepines and/or gabapentinoids), assessed via routinely collected ED data. Anticipated sample size is 2000 patients (n=1000 intervention, n=1000 control) based on average monthly admissions of LBP presentations in the EDs. Secondary outcomes include inpatient admission rate, time to mobilisation, provision of patient education, imaging requests, representation to the ED within 6 months and healthcare costs. In nested qualitative research, we will study ED clinicians' perceptions of the implementation and identify how benefits can be sustained over time.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study received ethical approval from the Metro North Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2022/MNHA/87995). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences and educational workshops.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12622001536752.

摘要

引言

针对腰痛(LBP)的管理指南建议排除严重的病理情况,然后采用简单的镇痛药、浅表热疗、早期活动和患者教育。在一家大型都市医院急诊部(ED)进行的审计显示,LBP 药物处方推荐率高(65%的患者开了阿片类药物,17%的患者开了苯二氮䓬类药物),住院率高(20%的 ED LBP 患者),患者活动延迟(平均 6 小时),以及患者教育不足(48%的患者)。本研究旨在通过实施一项先前已被证明能改善澳大利亚其他 ED 中 LBP 管理的指南的干预措施,来改善 ED 中 LBP 的药物处方。

方法和分析

一项对照性中断时间序列研究将在实施前(24 周;2023 年 3 月 20 日至 2023 年 9 月 3 日)和实施后(24 周;2024 年 11 月 27 日至 2024 年 5 月 12 日)评估 ED 中的干预措施,另外还将与同一卫生服务机构的另一家 ED 进行比较。该多组分实施策略使用正式的临床流程图来支持临床决策,并通过临床医生教育、提供替代治疗方法、教育资源、审核和反馈来改变临床医生的行为,由实施冠军提供支持。主要结局指标是通过常规收集的 ED 数据评估的开具非推荐药物(阿片类药物、苯二氮䓬类药物和/或加巴喷丁类药物)的 LBP 患者的百分比。根据 ED 中 LBP 就诊的平均每月入院人数,预计样本量为 2000 名患者(n=1000 名干预组,n=1000 名对照组)。次要结局指标包括住院率、活动时间、患者教育提供情况、影像学检查请求、6 个月内到 ED 的就诊情况以及医疗保健费用。在嵌套的定性研究中,我们将研究 ED 临床医生对实施的看法,并确定如何随着时间的推移维持效益。

伦理和传播

这项研究得到了 Metro North 人类研究伦理委员会(HREC/2022/MNHA/87995)的伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在国际会议和教育研讨会上展示。

注册号

ACTRN12622001536752。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/10936499/966b6dd85e6a/bmjopen-2023-082668f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/10936499/966b6dd85e6a/bmjopen-2023-082668f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/10936499/966b6dd85e6a/bmjopen-2023-082668f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Reinforcing informed medication prescription for low back pain in the emergency department (RIME): a controlled interrupted time series implementation study protocol.强化急诊科下腰痛患者的知情药物处方(RIME):一项对照中断时间序列实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e082668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082668.
2
Implementation of an evidence-based model of care for low back pain in emergency departments: protocol for the Sydney Health Partners Emergency Department (SHaPED) trial.急诊科基于循证的腰痛护理模式实施:悉尼健康伙伴急诊科(SHaPED)试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 19;8(4):e019052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019052.
3
Clinical Observation, Management and Function Of low back pain Relief Therapies (COMFORT): A cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.临床观察、管理与下腰痛缓解治疗的作用(COMFORT):一项集群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 21;13(11):e075286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075286.
4
Nine recommendations for the emergency department for patients presenting with low back pain based on management and post-discharge outcomes in an Australian, tertiary emergency department.基于澳大利亚一家三级急诊部的管理和出院后结局,为因腰痛就诊的患者提出的 9 项急诊科建议。
Emerg Med Australas. 2024 Apr;36(2):310-317. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14354. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
5
Behavioural 'nudging' interventions to reduce low-value care for low back pain in the emergency department (NUDG-ED): protocol for a 2×2 factorial, before-after, cluster randomised trial.行为“助推”干预措施以减少急诊科低价值腰痛护理(NUDG-ED):一项 2×2 析因、前后、群组随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 28;14(3):e079870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079870.
6
Emergency department evaluation, treatment, and functional outcomes among patients presenting with low back pain.急诊部门对以腰痛就诊患者的评估、治疗和功能结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.048. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
7
A Virtual Hospital Model of Care for Low Back Pain, Back@Home: Protocol for a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Type-I Study.一种针对腰痛的虚拟医院护理模式,居家护腰:一项混合有效性-实施I型研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 22;13:e50146. doi: 10.2196/50146.
8
Effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve emergency department care of low back pain: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.多方面干预措施提高急诊科腰痛治疗效果的效果:一项阶梯式、整群随机试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):825-835. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012337. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
9
Use of opioids and analgesics among ED patients with dental and low back pain: A national perspective.急诊科有牙科和下背痛的患者使用阿片类药物和镇痛药:一个国家的视角。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;37(6):1085-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.062. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Epidemiology of back pain visits and medication usage among United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023.2016 年至 2023 年美国急诊部门背痛就诊和药物使用的流行病学研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.020. Epub 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to recommended guidelines for low back pain presentations to an Australian emergency department: Barriers and enablers.澳大利亚急诊科针对腰痛患者遵循推荐指南的情况:障碍与促进因素
Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Dec;26(4):326-332. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 14.
2
Managing the opioid crisis in North America and beyond.应对北美及其他地区的阿片类药物危机。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):495. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00200-8. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve emergency department care of low back pain: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
多方面干预措施提高急诊科腰痛治疗效果的效果:一项阶梯式、整群随机试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):825-835. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012337. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Trends in opioid prescribing in Australia: a systematic review.澳大利亚阿片类药物处方趋势:系统评价。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Apr;44(2):277-287. doi: 10.1071/AH18245.
5
Concomitant prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines in Australia, 2012-2017.2012 - 2017年澳大利亚阿片类药物与苯二氮䓬类药物的联合处方情况
Med J Aust. 2019 Jan;210(1):39-40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.12026. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Prevalence and incidence of prescription opioid analgesic use in Australia.澳大利亚处方类阿片类镇痛药的使用情况:流行率和发生率。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jan;85(1):202-215. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13792. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
7
The use of controls in interrupted time series studies of public health interventions.公共卫生干预措施的中断时间序列研究中对照的使用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):2082-2093. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy135.
8
Implementation of an evidence-based model of care for low back pain in emergency departments: protocol for the Sydney Health Partners Emergency Department (SHaPED) trial.急诊科基于循证的腰痛护理模式实施:悉尼健康伙伴急诊科(SHaPED)试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 19;8(4):e019052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019052.
9
Managing non-serious low back pain in the emergency department: Time for a change?急诊科非重症下腰痛的管理:是时候做出改变了吗?
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Apr;30(2):279-282. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12903. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Overprescribing is major contributor to opioid crisis.过度开药是阿片类药物危机的主要促成因素。
BMJ. 2017 Oct 19;359:j4792. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4792.