Suppr超能文献

液体潴留对难治性恶病质癌症患者恶病质诊断标准预后能力的影响。

Impacts of fluid retention on prognostic abilities of cachexia diagnostic criteria in cancer patients with refractory cachexia.

机构信息

Palliative and Supportive Care Center, Osaka University Hospital, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; Department of Psycho-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.

Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2024 Apr;60:373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.02.026. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The international cancer cachexia criteria with a cutoff of 5% weight loss (WL) was proposed in Western patients. The Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) developed new criteria in Asian patients. The AWGC criteria are not cancer-specific and employ a cutoff of 2% WL. However, it is unclear whether both criteria are useful in patients with very advanced cancer because WL can be underestimated owing to fluid retention. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impacts of fluid retention on the prognostic abilities of both criteria in cancer patients with weeks of survival.

METHODS

This study involved a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria constrained the study to adult patients with advanced cancer. Patients were divided into Non-cachexia and Cachexia groups using the international criteria and AWGC criteria. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and by conducting univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 402 patients were included in the analysis. Using the international criteria, the p-values for the log-rank test and stratified log-rank test for the mixed patients with and without fluid retention were 0.55 and 0.18, respectively. Using the AWGC criteria, the p-values for the log-rank test and stratified log-rank test for the mixed patients with and without fluid retention were 0.38 and 0.12, respectively. Without considering the impacts of fluid retention, no significant differences were observed between the Non-cachexia and Cachexia groups for both criteria. After adjusting for the status of fluid retention, significantly higher risks of mortality were not observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the Cachexia group compared with the Non-cachexia group, for both criteria. However, significant associations were observed between fluid retention and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The international criteria and AWGC criteria lost their prognostic abilities in cancer patients with weeks of survival. Since measurements of %WL were significantly confounded by fluid retention, fluid retention-adjusted criteria for cachexia need to be developed for cancer patients with refractory cachexia.

摘要

背景与目的

国际癌症恶病质标准以 5%的体重减轻(WL)为截断值,适用于西方患者。亚洲恶病质工作组(AWGC)为亚洲患者制定了新的标准。AWGC 标准不是癌症特异性的,采用 2%WL 的截断值。然而,由于液体潴留,WL 可能被低估,因此尚不清楚这两个标准是否对生存时间为数周的晚期癌症患者都有用。

方法

本研究为一项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。纳入标准限制研究对象为患有晚期癌症的成年患者。使用国际标准和 AWGC 标准将患者分为非恶病质组和恶病质组。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验进行生存时间分析,并进行单因素和多因素 Cox 回归分析。

结果

共纳入 402 例患者进行分析。使用国际标准,有液体潴留和无液体潴留混合患者的 log-rank 检验和分层 log-rank 检验的 p 值分别为 0.55 和 0.18。使用 AWGC 标准,有液体潴留和无液体潴留混合患者的 log-rank 检验和分层 log-rank 检验的 p 值分别为 0.38 和 0.12。不考虑液体潴留的影响,两种标准下非恶病质组和恶病质组之间无显著差异。在调整液体潴留状态后,对于两种标准,Cox 比例风险模型中恶病质组的死亡风险均无显著升高。然而,液体潴留与总生存之间存在显著相关性。

结论

在生存时间为数周的癌症患者中,国际标准和 AWGC 标准失去了其预后能力。由于 %WL 的测量受到液体潴留的显著影响,因此需要为有难治性恶病质的癌症患者制定液体潴留调整后的恶病质标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验