General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 28;15:1290286. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1290286. eCollection 2024.
This study was aimed to develop a nomogram that can accurately predict the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with abdominal obesity by utilizing various predictor factors.
A total of 1490 cases of abdominal obesity were randomly selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database for the years 2011-2014. The diagnostic criteria for abdominal obesity were as follows: waist size ≥ 102 cm for men and waist size ≥ 88 cm for women, and cognitive function was assessed by Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD), Word Learning subtest, Delayed Word Recall Test, Animal Fluency Test (AFT), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). The cases were divided into two sets: a training set consisting of 1043 cases (70%) and a validation set consisting of 447 cases (30%). To create the model nomogram, multifactor logistic regression models were constructed based on the selected predictors identified through LASSO regression analysis. The model's performance was assessed using several metrics, including the consistency index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess the clinical benefit of the model.
The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, sex, education level, 24-hour total fat intake, red blood cell folate concentration, depression, and moderate work activity were significant predictors of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with abdominal obesity ( < 0.05). These predictors were incorporated into the nomogram. The C-indices for the training and validation sets were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.875-0.842) and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.758-0.851), respectively. The corresponding AUC values were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.875-0.842) and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.753-0.847). The calibration curves demonstrated a satisfactory level of agreement between the nomogram model and the observed data. The DCA indicated that early intervention for at-risk populations would provide a net benefit, as indicated by the line graph.
Age, sex, education level, 24-hour total fat intake, red blood cell folate concentration, depression, and moderate work activity were identified as predictive factors for cognitive dysfunction in individuals with abdominal obesity. In conclusion, the nomogram model developed in this study can effectively predict the clinical risk of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with abdominal obesity.
本研究旨在通过利用多种预测因素,建立一个可以准确预测腹型肥胖个体认知功能障碍可能性的列线图。
从 2011-2014 年的国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库中随机抽取 1490 例腹型肥胖病例。腹型肥胖的诊断标准为:男性腰围≥102cm,女性腰围≥88cm,认知功能采用认知障碍协会(CERAD)制定的词汇学习测验、延迟词汇回忆测验、动物流畅性测验(AFT)和数字符号替换测验(DSST)进行评估。病例分为两组:训练组(n=1043,70%)和验证组(n=447,30%)。通过 LASSO 回归分析选择预测因子,建立多因素逻辑回归模型,构建模型列线图。采用一致性指数(C 指数)、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能,以评估模型的临床获益。
多元逻辑回归分析显示,年龄、性别、教育程度、24 小时总脂肪摄入量、红细胞叶酸浓度、抑郁和适度工作活动是腹型肥胖个体认知功能障碍的显著预测因素(<0.05)。这些预测因素被纳入列线图。训练组和验证组的 C 指数分别为 0.814(95%CI:0.875-0.842)和 0.805(95%CI:0.758-0.851),相应的 AUC 值分别为 0.814(95%CI:0.875-0.842)和 0.795(95%CI:0.753-0.847)。校准曲线显示列线图模型与观察数据之间具有良好的一致性。DCA 表明,对于高危人群进行早期干预将带来净收益,这一点可以从折线图中看出。
年龄、性别、教育程度、24 小时总脂肪摄入量、红细胞叶酸浓度、抑郁和适度工作活动是腹型肥胖个体认知功能障碍的预测因素。总之,本研究建立的列线图模型可以有效预测腹型肥胖个体认知功能障碍的临床风险。