School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 12;15(12):2721. doi: 10.3390/nu15122721.
We aimed to explore the correlation between plant-based diet indices and abdominal obesity with depression and anxiety among older Chinese adults. This study used a cross-sectional design using data from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). We used a simplified food frequency questionnaire to evaluate the overall plant-based diet index (PDI), the healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), and the unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI) separately, based on the potential health effects of the foods. Waist circumference (WC) was used to define abdominal obesity. The 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) were applied to estimate depression symptoms and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Multi-adjusted binary logistic regression models were conducted to explore the effects of the three plant-based diet indices, abdominal obesity status, and their interaction on depression and anxiety. We enrolled a total of 11,623 participants aged 83.21 ± 10.98 years, of which 3140 (27.0%) participants had depression and 1361 (11.7%) had anxiety. The trend in the prevalence of depression/anxiety across increasing quartiles of the plant-based diet indices was statistically significant after controlling for potential confounders (-trend < 0.05). Abdominal obesity was related to a lower prevalence of depression (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95) and anxiety (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90) compared with non-abdominal obesity. The protective effects of the PDI and hPDI against depression (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.64; OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48-0.73, respectively) and anxiety (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-1.00; OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.70, respectively) were more pronounced in non-abdominally obese participants. The harmful effects of the uPDI against depression (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.42-2.23) and anxiety (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.16-2.10) were more pronounced in non-abdominally obese participants. In addition, a significant interaction between the plant-based diet indices and abdominal obesity was observed in terms of causing the prevalence of depression and anxiety. Consuming more of a healthful plant-based diet and less of an animal-based diet is related to a lower prevalence of depression and anxiety. A healthful plant-based diet plays a vital role in non-abdominally obese individuals.
本研究旨在探讨植物性饮食指数与腹型肥胖与中国老年人抑郁和焦虑的相关性。本研究采用 2018 年中国长寿队列研究(CLHLS)的横断面设计。我们使用简化的食物频率问卷分别评估整体植物性饮食指数(PDI)、健康植物性饮食指数(hPDI)和不健康植物性饮食指数(uPDI),基于食物的潜在健康影响。腰围(WC)用于定义腹型肥胖。采用 10 项流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D-10)和 7 项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)分别评估抑郁症状和焦虑症状。采用多调整二项逻辑回归模型探讨三种植物性饮食指数、腹型肥胖状况及其交互作用对抑郁和焦虑的影响。我们共纳入了 11623 名年龄为 83.21±10.98 岁的参与者,其中 3140 名(27.0%)参与者患有抑郁,1361 名(11.7%)患有焦虑。在控制了潜在混杂因素后,随着植物性饮食指数四分位数的增加,抑郁/焦虑的患病率呈统计学意义的下降趋势(-趋势<0.05)。与非腹型肥胖相比,腹型肥胖与较低的抑郁(OR=0.86,95%CI:0.77-0.95)和焦虑(OR=0.79,95%CI:0.69-0.90)患病率相关。PDI 和 hPDI 对抑郁(OR=0.52,95%CI:0.41-0.64;OR=0.59,95%CI:0.48-0.73)和焦虑(OR=0.75,95%CI:0.57-1.00;OR=0.52,95%CI:0.39-0.70)的保护作用在非腹型肥胖参与者中更为明显。uPDI 对抑郁(OR=1.78,95%CI:1.42-2.23)和焦虑(OR=1.56,95%CI:1.16-2.10)的有害作用在非腹型肥胖参与者中更为明显。此外,在导致抑郁和焦虑的患病率方面,植物性饮食指数与腹型肥胖之间存在显著的交互作用。摄入更多健康的植物性饮食和更少的动物性饮食与较低的抑郁和焦虑患病率相关。健康的植物性饮食在非腹型肥胖人群中起着至关重要的作用。