Danish Ramazzini Centre, Department of Occupational Medicine, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 May 1;50(4):244-256. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4152. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the association between occupational mechanical exposures and hip osteoarthritis.
The study was registered in PROSPERO. A systematic literature search was conducted in six databases to identify relevant articles. Two authors independently excluded articles, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias of each included article, and graded the level of evidence. We conducted a meta-analysis using random-effects model and performed a sensitivity analysis stratifying articles based on the risk of bias assessment, study design, and the outcome measurement.
Twenty-four articles were eligible for inclusion. The highest pooled odds ratio (OR) was found for combined mechanical exposures [OR 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.0], non-neutral postures (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1), lifting/carrying loads (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9), and climbing stairs (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). The range of pooled OR for the remaining mechanical exposures (eg, standing, walking, kneeling, squatting, and sitting) was 0.6-1.6. Grading the quality of evidence, a moderate level of evidence was found for the combined mechanical exposures and for lifting/carrying loads. The remaining exposure categories were graded as having either low or very low levels of evidence.
Considerable heterogeneity was observed across the included studies, and high-quality literature using objective exposure measurements is warranted. Despite various limitations affecting the comparability, occupational mechanical exposures seem to influence the likelihood of developing hip osteoarthritis.
本研究旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查职业机械暴露与髋骨关节炎之间的关联。
该研究已在 PROSPERO 上注册。通过在六个数据库中进行系统文献检索,确定了相关文章。两位作者独立筛选文章、提取数据、评估纳入文章的偏倚风险,并对证据水平进行分级。我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并根据偏倚评估、研究设计和结果测量对文章进行分层进行敏感性分析。
有 24 篇文章符合纳入标准。组合机械暴露(OR 1.7,95%置信区间(CI)1.4-2.0)、非中立姿势(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.4-2.1)、举重/搬运负荷(OR 1.6,95%CI 1.3-1.9)和爬楼梯(OR 1.6,95%CI 1.1-2.2)的合并比值比(OR)最高。其余机械暴露(如站立、行走、跪着、蹲着和坐着)的合并 OR 范围为 0.6-1.6。对证据质量进行分级,发现组合机械暴露和举重/搬运负荷的证据质量为中等水平。其余暴露类别被评为低或极低水平的证据。
纳入的研究存在相当大的异质性,需要使用客观暴露测量的高质量文献。尽管存在影响可比性的各种限制,但职业机械暴露似乎会影响髋骨关节炎的发生可能性。