Danish Ramazzini Centre, Department of Occupational Medicine, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Oct 1;49(7):453-465. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4114. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
OBJECTIVES: The association between occupational mechanical exposures and low-back pain (LBP) has been studied in several systematic reviews. However, no systematic review addressing chronic LBP exists. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the association between occupational mechanical exposures and chronic LBP. METHODS: The study was registered in PROSPERO. We used an existing systematic review to identify articles published before January 2014. For studies published between January 2014 and September 2022, a systematic literature search was conducted in six databases. Two authors independently excluded articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and level of evidence (GRADE). Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models comparing highest versus lowest exposure group with sensitivity analyses based on study quality (low/moderate versus high risk of bias), study design (cohort versus case-control), and outcome definition (non-specific LBP versus specific chronic LBP). RESULTS: Twenty-six articles were included. Highest pooled odd ratios (OR) were found for combined mechanical exposures [OR 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-3.6], lifting/carrying loads (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2), and non-neutral postures (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9). For the remaining mechanical exposures (ie, whole-body vibrations, standing/walking, and sitting), OR ranged between 1.0 and 1.4. In the sensitivity analyses, generally, higher pooled OR were found in low/moderate risk of bias studies, case-control studies, and studies of specific chronic LBP. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate evidence of an association was found for lifting/carrying loads, non-neutral postures, and combined mechanical exposures. Low or very low evidence was found for whole-body vibrations, standing/walking, and sitting. Studies using standardized exposure definition, metric, and technical measurements are highly warranted.
目的:职业机械暴露与下背痛(LBP)之间的关联已在多项系统评价中进行了研究。然而,目前尚无针对慢性 LBP 的系统评价。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是检验职业机械暴露与慢性 LBP 之间的关联。
方法:该研究已在 PROSPERO 注册。我们使用现有的系统评价来确定 2014 年 1 月之前发表的文章。对于 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间发表的研究,我们在六个数据库中进行了系统文献检索。两名作者独立排除文章、提取数据,并评估了偏倚风险和证据水平(GRADE)。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,比较最高暴露组与最低暴露组,同时根据研究质量(低/中度与高偏倚风险)、研究设计(队列与病例对照)和结局定义(非特异性 LBP 与特异性慢性 LBP)进行敏感性分析。
结果:共纳入 26 篇文章。对于综合机械暴露(OR 2.2,95%置信区间[CI] 1.4-3.6)、举物/搬运负荷(OR 1.7,95% CI 1.4-2.2)和非中立姿势(OR 1.5,95% CI 1.2-1.9),最高汇总比值比(OR)最高。对于其余的机械暴露(即全身振动、站立/行走和坐姿),OR 介于 1.0 至 1.4 之间。在敏感性分析中,在低/中度偏倚风险研究、病例对照研究和特异性慢性 LBP 研究中,一般发现更高的汇总 OR。
结论:对于举物/搬运负荷、非中立姿势和综合机械暴露,有中等证据表明存在关联。对于全身振动、站立/行走和坐姿,证据水平较低或非常低。高度需要使用标准化暴露定义、度量和技术测量的研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023-10-1
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024-5-1
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024-7-1
Occup Environ Med. 2024-10-23
Occup Environ Med. 2014-3-27
Occup Med (Lond). 2011-7-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024-11-25
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-5-23
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-1-9
Saf Health Work. 2024-12
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025-3-1
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024-7-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-8-28
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019-7-29
Sci Rep. 2019-4-25
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019-9-1