Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 10;42(14):1687-1698. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02105. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
We performed a pooled analysis of multiple trials of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to investigate the efficacy of PARPi in each individual homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutated (m) gene.
We pooled patient-level data from trials of PARPi in mCRPC that reported mutation status in individual HRR genes. Any HRR gene with available data across all the randomized trials of PARPi in first-line mCRPC was selected. The hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) for radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; by blinded independent review) and overall survival (OS) of a PARPi plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) relative to placebo plus an ARPI in the pool of three randomized trials in first-line mCRPC were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model.
In m (N = 268), rPFS HR was 1.05 (0.74 to 1.49) and OS HR was 1.18 (0.82 to 1.71). In m (N = 64), rPFS HR was 0.51 (0.23 to 1.1) and OS HR was 0.74 (0.34 to 1.61). In m (N = 422), rPFS HR was 0.31 (0.23 to 0.42) and OS HR was 0.66 (0.49 to 0.89). In m (N = 164), rPFS HR was 0.50 (0.32 to 0.80) and OS HR was 0.63 (0.39 to 0.99). In m (N = 172), rPFS HR was 1.06 (0.67 to 1.66) and OS HR was 1.53 (0.95 to 2.46). In m (N = 41) rPFS HR was 0.52 (0.23 to 1.17) and OS HR was 0.78 (0.34 to 1.8).
In this pooled analysis, benefit from PARPi appeared greatest for patients with m, m, m, and m. Given limitations of this exploratory analysis, the apparent lack of benefit from PARPi in patients with m or m should be further explored in future clinical trials.
我们对多个多聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的试验进行了汇总分析,以研究 PARPi 在每个同源重组修复(HRR)突变(m)基因中的疗效。
我们汇总了 PARPi 在 mCRPC 中的试验中患者水平的数据,这些试验报告了单个 HRR 基因的突变状态。选择了所有 PARPi 一线 mCRPC 随机试验中具有可用数据的任何 HRR 基因。使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计和 Cox 比例风险模型计算了 PARPi 加雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARPI)相对于安慰剂加 ARPI 在一线 mCRPC 的三项随机试验中的汇总中对放射学无进展生存期(rPFS;由盲法独立审查)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR;95%CI)。
在 m(N=268)中,rPFS HR 为 1.05(0.74 至 1.49),OS HR 为 1.18(0.82 至 1.71)。在 m(N=64)中,rPFS HR 为 0.51(0.23 至 1.1),OS HR 为 0.74(0.34 至 1.61)。在 m(N=422)中,rPFS HR 为 0.31(0.23 至 0.42),OS HR 为 0.66(0.49 至 0.89)。在 m(N=164)中,rPFS HR 为 0.50(0.32 至 0.80),OS HR 为 0.63(0.39 至 0.99)。在 m(N=172)中,rPFS HR 为 1.06(0.67 至 1.66),OS HR 为 1.53(0.95 至 2.46)。在 m(N=41)中,rPFS HR 为 0.52(0.23 至 1.17),OS HR 为 0.78(0.34 至 1.8)。
在这项汇总分析中,PARPi 对 m、m、m 和 m 患者的获益似乎最大。鉴于这项探索性分析的局限性,应该在未来的临床试验中进一步探讨 PARPi 在 m 或 m 患者中缺乏获益的原因。