Suppr超能文献

老年人的日常担忧、沉思和睡眠。

Daily worry, rumination, and sleep in late life.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2024 Apr;179:111622. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111622. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Perseverative thinking (e.g., worry/rumination) is a common response to stress, and can be detrimental to well-being. Sleep may represent an important mechanism by which perseverative thinking is disrupted or amplified from day to day. This study examined the associations between older adults' everyday worry, rumination, and sleep.

METHODS

Older adults (N = 270) aged 65-89 completed a baseline interview and morning and evening assessments each day for 5-6 days. Every morning, they indicated their worry toward the day and their sleep duration and disturbances the prior night. Every evening, they rated worry and rumination experienced that day.

RESULTS

Multilevel models showed that perseverative thinking predicted worse sleep (i.e., fewer hours of sleep) at the between-person level (B = -0.29, p = .004) but better sleep (i.e., fewer sleep disturbances) at the within-person level (Bs < -0.18, ps < .003). At the within-person level, more hours of sleep (B = -0.06, p = .04) and fewer sleep disturbances (B = 0.10, p < .001) predicted less worry the next morning. Prior night's worry predicted greater next morning's worry, but this association was significant only when older adults reported fewer-than-usual hours of sleep (B = 0.24, p < .001), not when they reported more-than-usual hours of sleep (B = 0.04, p = .61).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that worry and rumination are intimately linked with sleep and highlight the protective role that better sleep may play in reducing older adults' everyday perseverative thinking.

摘要

目的

执着思维(例如,担忧/沉思)是对压力的常见反应,可能对幸福感有害。睡眠可能是一种重要的机制,可以每天破坏或放大执着思维。本研究考察了老年人日常担忧、沉思和睡眠之间的关联。

方法

年龄在 65-89 岁的老年人(N=270)完成了基线访谈,并在 5-6 天内每天早晚进行评估。每天早上,他们报告当天的担忧以及前一天晚上的睡眠时间和睡眠障碍。每天晚上,他们评估当天经历的担忧和沉思。

结果

多层次模型显示,执着思维在个体间水平上预测睡眠较差(即睡眠时间较少)(B=-0.29,p=.004),但在个体内水平上预测睡眠较好(即睡眠干扰较少)(Bs<-.18,ps<.003)。在个体内水平上,更多的睡眠时间(B=-.06,p=.04)和更少的睡眠干扰(B=0.10,p<.001)预测第二天早上的担忧减少。前一晚的担忧预测第二天早上的担忧更大,但这种关联仅在老年人报告睡眠时间少于平时时才显著(B=0.24,p<.001),而在报告睡眠时间多于平时时则不显著(B=0.04,p=.61)。

结论

研究结果表明,担忧和沉思与睡眠密切相关,并强调了更好的睡眠可能在减少老年人日常执着思维方面发挥的保护作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验