University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 13;14(3):e073816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073816.
To explore the acceptability of an optimised physiotherapy (OPTimisE) intervention for people with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) and feasibility of comparing it to usual care in a randomised controlled trial.
Semistructured interviews, analysed using thematic analysis and mapped onto the COM-B model of behaviour change.
Conducted as part of the OPTimisE Pilot & Feasibility randomised controlled trial within physiotherapy departments in the United Kingdom National Health Service.
17 patients with LET (purposively sampled to provide representativeness based on age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation index and treatment allocation) and all 8 physiotherapists involved as treating clinicians or site principal investigators.
Four themes were identified. First, participants reported the OPTimisE intervention as acceptable. Second, differences between the OPTimisE intervention and usual care were identified, including the use of an orthosis, holistic advice/education including modifiable risk factors, forearm stretches, general upper body strengthening and a more prescriptive exercise-dosing regimen. Third, participants provided feedback related to the trial resources, which were viewed positively, but identified language translation as a need. Fourth, feedback related to trial processes identified the need for changes to outcome collection and reduction of administrative burden. From the perspective of adopting the OPTimisE intervention, we found evidence that participants were able to change their behaviour. Considering the findings through the lens of the COM-B model, the intervention is likely to be deliverable in practice and the trial can be delivered at scale with some additional support for physiotherapists.
Overall, the OPTimisE intervention was found to be different to usual care and acceptable to patients and physiotherapists. The study highlighted the need to refine trial processes and resources prior to a full-scale trial, to reduce administrative burden, increase support for physiotherapists, improve return rate of outcome questionnaires and provide language translation.
ISRCTN database 19 July 2021. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN64444585.
探索一种优化的物理治疗(OptimisE)干预措施在外侧肘肌腱病(LET)患者中的可接受性,并在随机对照试验中比较其与常规护理的可行性。
半结构化访谈,采用主题分析进行分析,并映射到行为改变的 COM-B 模型。
在英国国民保健系统的物理治疗部门内作为 OPTimisE 试点和可行性随机对照试验的一部分进行。
17 名 LET 患者(根据年龄、性别、种族、贫困指数和治疗分配进行有针对性的抽样,以提供代表性)和所有 8 名参与治疗的物理治疗师或现场主要研究者。
确定了四个主题。首先,参与者报告 Optimise 干预措施是可以接受的。其次,确定了 Optimise 干预措施与常规护理之间的差异,包括使用矫形器、全面的建议/教育,包括可改变的危险因素、前臂伸展、全身上半身强化和更具规定性的运动剂量方案。第三,参与者提供了与试验资源相关的反馈,这些反馈受到了积极评价,但发现需要进行语言翻译。第四,与试验过程相关的反馈确定了需要改变结果收集并减少行政负担。从采用 Optimise 干预措施的角度来看,我们发现有证据表明参与者能够改变他们的行为。从 COM-B 模型的角度考虑这些发现,该干预措施在实践中可能具有可操作性,并且可以在规模上进行试验,同时为物理治疗师提供一些额外的支持。
总体而言,OptimisE 干预措施与常规护理不同,且患者和物理治疗师都可以接受。该研究强调在全面试验之前需要细化试验流程和资源,以减少行政负担,增加对物理治疗师的支持,提高结果问卷的回复率,并提供语言翻译。
ISRCTN 数据库 2021 年 7 月 19 日。https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN64444585。