Department of Medical Neurobiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada (IMRIC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel.
IMRIC Center for Addiction Research (ICARe), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel.
J Neurosci. 2024 May 1;44(18):e1469232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1469-23.2024.
The ventral pallidum (VP) is a central hub in the reward circuitry with diverse projections that have different behavioral roles attributed mostly to the connectivity with the downstream target. However, different VP projections may represent, as in the striatum, separate neuronal populations that differ in more than just connectivity. In this study, we performed in mice of both sexes a multimodal dissection of four major projections of the VP-to the lateral hypothalamus (VP), ventral tegmental area (VP), lateral habenula (VP), and mediodorsal thalamus (VP)-with physiological, anatomical, genetic, and behavioral tools. We also tested for physiological differences between VP neurons receiving input from nucleus accumbens medium spiny neurons (MSNs) that express either the D1 (D1-MSNs) or the D2 (D2-MSNs) dopamine receptor. We show that each VP projection (1) when inhibited during a cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) test affects performance differently, (2) receives a different pattern of inputs using rabies retrograde labeling, (3) shows differentially expressed genes using RNA sequencing, and (4) has projection-specific characteristics in excitability and synaptic input characteristics using whole-cell patch clamp. VP and VP projections have different effects on CPP and show low overlap in circuit tracing experiments, as VP neurons receive more striatal input, while VP neurons receive more olfactory input. Additionally, VP neurons are less excitable, while VP neurons are more excitable than the average VP neuron, a difference driven mainly by D2-MSN-responding neurons. Thus, VP and VP neurons may represent largely distinct populations of VP neurons.
腹侧苍白球(VP)是奖励回路的中枢枢纽,具有不同的投射,这些投射具有不同的行为作用,主要归因于与下游靶标的连接。然而,不同的 VP 投射可能代表了不同的神经元群体,就像在纹状体中一样,这些神经元群体在连接之外的差异不仅仅是连接。在这项研究中,我们使用雌雄小鼠,使用生理、解剖、遗传和行为工具,对 VP 到外侧下丘脑(VP)、腹侧被盖区(VP)、外侧缰核(VP)和中脑背侧核(VP)的四个主要 VP 投射进行了多模态剖析。我们还测试了来自表达多巴胺 D1 受体(D1-MSNs)或 D2 受体(D2-MSNs)的伏隔核中间神经元(MSNs)输入的 VP 神经元之间的生理差异。我们表明,每个 VP 投射(1)在可卡因条件性位置偏好(CPP)测试期间被抑制时,会以不同的方式影响表现;(2)使用狂犬病毒逆行标记接收不同模式的输入;(3)使用 RNA 测序显示差异表达基因;(4)使用全细胞膜片钳显示兴奋性和突触输入特性的投射特异性特征。VP 和 VP 投射对 CPP 有不同的影响,并且在回路追踪实验中显示出低重叠,因为 VP 神经元接收更多纹状体的输入,而 VP 神经元接收更多嗅觉输入。此外,VP 神经元的兴奋性较低,而 VP 神经元的兴奋性高于平均 VP 神经元,这种差异主要由 D2-MSN 反应神经元驱动。因此,VP 和 VP 神经元可能代表了 VP 神经元的两个截然不同的群体。