Suppr超能文献

横纹肌溶解症中的肾脏替代治疗与保守疗法:回顾性分析。

Kidney replacement and conservative therapies in rhabdomyolysis: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Medical Department III, Division of Nephrology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Medical ICU, University of Leipzig Medical Center, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2024 Mar 14;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03536-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Toxic renal effects of myoglobin following rhabdomyolysis can cause acute kidney injury (AKI) with the necessity of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Fast elimination of myoglobin seems notable to save kidney function and intensify kidney repair. Clinical data regarding efficacy of KRT in critical care patients with rhabdomyolysis and AKI are limited. This retrospective analysis aimed to identify differences between conservative therapy and different modalities of KRT regarding myoglobin elimination and clinical outcome.

METHODS

This systematic, retrospective, single-center study analyzed 328 critical care patients with rhabdomyolysis (myoglobin > 1000 µg/l). Median reduction rate of myoglobin after starting KRT was calculated and compared for different modalities. Multivariate logistic regression models were established to identify potential confounder on hospital mortality. Filter lifetime of the various extracorporeal circuits was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

From 328 included patients 171 required KRT. Health condition at admission of this group was more critical compared to patient with conservative therapy. Myoglobin reduction rate did not differ between the groups (KRT 49% [30.8%; 72.2%] vs. conservative treatment (CT) 61% [38.5%; 73.5%]; p = 0.082). Comparison between various extracorporeal procedures concerning mortality showed no significant differences. Hospital mortality was 55.6% among patients with KRT and 18.5% with CT (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression model identified requirement for KRT (OR: 2.163; CI: 1.061-4.407); p = 0.034) and the SOFA Score (OR: 1.111; CI: 1.004-1.228; p = 0.041) as independent predictive factors for hospital mortality. When comparing specific KRT using multivariate regression, no benefit was demonstrated for any treatment modality. Life span of the extracorporeal circuit was shorter with CVVH compared to that of others (log-Rank p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes that AKI requiring KRT following rhabdomyolysis is accompanied by high mortality rate. Differences in myoglobin reduction rate between various KRTs could not be confirmed, but CVVH was associated with reduced filter lifetime compared to other KRTs, which enable myoglobin elimination, too.

摘要

背景

横纹肌溶解症导致的肌红蛋白的毒性肾效应可引起急性肾损伤(AKI),需要肾脏替代治疗(KRT)。快速消除肌红蛋白似乎可以显著挽救肾功能并加强肾脏修复。关于横纹肌溶解症合并 AKI 的危重症患者中 KRT 的疗效的临床数据有限。本回顾性分析旨在确定 KRT 与不同的肾脏替代治疗模式之间在肌红蛋白清除和临床结局方面的差异。

方法

这是一项系统的、回顾性的、单中心研究,共纳入 328 例横纹肌溶解症(肌红蛋白>1000μg/L)的危重症患者。计算并比较了开始 KRT 后肌红蛋白的中位降低率。采用多变量逻辑回归模型确定住院死亡率的潜在混杂因素。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析各种体外回路的滤器寿命。

结果

在 328 例纳入的患者中,171 例需要 KRT。与接受保守治疗的患者相比,该组患者入院时的健康状况更为危急。两组的肌红蛋白降低率无差异(KRT 组 49%[30.8%;72.2%]与保守治疗组 61%[38.5%;73.5%];p=0.082)。关于死亡率的各种体外程序比较没有显示出显著差异。KRT 组的住院死亡率为 55.6%,而 CT 组为 18.5%(p<0.001)。多变量逻辑回归模型确定了 KRT 的需求(OR:2.163;CI:1.061-4.407)和 SOFA 评分(OR:1.111;CI:1.004-1.228;p=0.041)是住院死亡率的独立预测因素。当使用多变量回归比较特定的 KRT 时,任何治疗方式都没有显示出获益。与其他治疗方式相比,CVVH 的体外循环寿命更短(对数秩检验 p=0.017)。

结论

本研究强调,横纹肌溶解症导致的 AKI 需接受 KRT 治疗,其死亡率较高。各种 KRT 之间的肌红蛋白降低率差异无法得到证实,但 CVVH 与其他 KRT 相比,滤器寿命更短,能够实现肌红蛋白的清除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2d/10938657/b93fb8e020e9/12882_2024_3536_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验