• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估的“稳定性”:扩展效用方程。

'Stability' of Assessment: Extending the Utility Equation.

作者信息

Sen Gupta Tarun, Wong Eugene, Doshi Deepak, Hays Richard

机构信息

James Cook University and The Australian College of Rural & Remote Medicine.

The Australian College of Rural & Remote Medicine.

出版信息

MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jun 4;10:155. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000155.1. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.15694/mep.2021.000155.1
PMID:38486563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10939557/
Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought many challenges to medical education, necessitating a rapid transition to digital delivery. The widespread move to online exams has introduced novel risks, including the risk of catastrophic IT failure. These are not 'black swan' events - something so unexpected and devastating that we could not anticipate them and prepare accordingly. The phrase 'black elephants', a cross between a black swan and 'the elephant in the room' has been coined to describe these events. Moving to high-stakes online examinations introduces another element that needs to be considered and managed: the 'stability' of the assessment format used. This dimension incorporates notions of 'platform reliability' and 'internal risk management' and can be caused by both unplanned events eg IT failures, and planned events like security breaches Developing approaches to mitigate this new risk suggests another dimension to the well-known assessment 'utility equation': stability of the platform used. This paper explores the concept of stability from the perspectives of educational institutions and candidates and offers some approaches to achieving stability. The delivery of assessment in the digital age, requires the 'utility equation' to be recalibrated and establishment of a new "sweet spot" for each assessment program.

摘要

本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐文章。新冠疫情给医学教育带来了诸多挑战,这使得医学教育有必要迅速转向数字化教学。广泛采用在线考试带来了新的风险,包括灾难性信息技术故障的风险。这些并非“黑天鹅”事件——即那些极其意外且具有毁灭性、以至于我们无法预料并做好相应准备的事件。“黑象”这一说法应运而生,它是“黑天鹅”和“房间里的大象”(指明显存在却被忽视的问题)的结合,用于描述此类事件。转向高风险的在线考试引入了另一个需要考虑和管理的因素:所使用评估形式的“稳定性”。这一维度包含“平台可靠性”和“内部风险管理”的概念,可能由意外事件(如信息技术故障)和计划事件(如安全漏洞)引发。开发减轻这种新风险的方法为著名的评估“效用方程”提出了另一个维度:所使用平台的稳定性。本文从教育机构和考生的角度探讨了稳定性的概念,并提供了一些实现稳定性的方法。在数字时代进行评估,需要重新校准“效用方程”,并为每个评估项目确立一个新的“最佳平衡点”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed8/10939557/52741c46b9df/mep-10-18979-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed8/10939557/52741c46b9df/mep-10-18979-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed8/10939557/52741c46b9df/mep-10-18979-g0000.jpg

相似文献

1
'Stability' of Assessment: Extending the Utility Equation.评估的“稳定性”:扩展效用方程。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jun 4;10:155. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000155.1. eCollection 2021.
2
Learners' Perspective towards E-Exams during COVID-19 Outbreak: Evidence from Higher Educational Institutions of India and Saudi Arabia.新冠疫情期间学习者对电子考试的看法:来自印度和沙特阿拉伯高等教育机构的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;18(12):6534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126534.
3
Swans and elephants: A typology to capture the challenges of food supply chain risk assessment.天鹅与大象:一种用于应对食品供应链风险评估挑战的类型学
Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020 Dec;106:288-297. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Managing the COVID-19 risk: the practicalities of delivering high stakes OSCEs during a pandemic.应对新冠疫情风险:疫情期间开展高风险客观结构化临床考试的实际操作
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Aug 19;9:173. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000173.1. eCollection 2020.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Rhinos and risk assessments: Adjusting risk assessment methodologies to account for 'unforeseeable' events.犀牛与风险评估:调整风险评估方法以考虑“不可预见”事件。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2021 Jan 1;15(2):196-204.
7
Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.小患者,大任务——一场儿科急诊医学密室逃脱游戏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;8(4):SG1-SG19. doi: 10.21980/J89W70. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
9
Twelve Tips for COVID-19 friendly learning design in medical education.医学教育中针对新冠疫情的友好型学习设计的十二条建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 May 20;9:103. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000103.1. eCollection 2020.
10
The COVID-19 pandemic and undergraduate medical student teaching/learning and assessment.新冠疫情与本科医学生的教学、学习及评估
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Feb 11;10:44. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000044.1. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Fellowship of the Australian College of Rural & Remote Medicine (FACRRM) Assessment: a review of the first 12 years.澳大利亚农村与偏远地区医学学院院士资格评定(FACRRM评定):头12年回顾
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 May 18;9:100. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000100.1. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: The perceptions of health professions educators.新冠疫情的影响:卫生专业教育工作者的看法
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Oct 6;9:142. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000142.2. eCollection 2020.
3
Twelve tips for OSCE-style Tele-assessment.
客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)式远程评估的十二条建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Aug 17;9:168. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000168.1. eCollection 2020.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the career of junior doctors.新冠疫情对初级医生职业生涯的影响。
Med J Aust. 2021 Apr;214(7):295-296.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50996. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
2018 Consensus framework for good assessment.2018 年良好评估共识框架。
Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1102-1109. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.