Abdelmannan Dima
Dubai Health Authority.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 May 14;10:127. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000127.1. eCollection 2021.
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. The use of simulation-based education in undergraduate medical education has many advantages. Purposeful planning of the sequence of simulation sessions within the curriculum is necessary for complex simulation exercises. This requires pre-session completion of prerequisite knowledge. Two surveys were conducted. An electronic survey was sent to faculty involved in simulation at UAE medical schools (n=29). The faculty survey addressed the simulation sessions planning process, sequencing of simulation topics, and institutional simulation team structure. The second survey was administered via paper to final year medical students from Dubai Medical College (DMC) who received simulation sessions (n=22). The survey addressed completion of prerequisite knowledge, receipt of the session objectives, and psychological safety and overall session ratings. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Responses to open ended questions were analyzed thematically. The faculty response rate was (21/29: 72.4%). Only (7/21: 33.3%) faculty members indicated there was prior planning to ensure proper sequencing within the curriculum. Only (3/21: 14.2%) indicated that simulation topics were chosen based on curriculum gaps. A small percentage (3/21: 14.2%) reported working with other faculty and an instructional designer. Qualitative themes included barriers to planning, structural considerations, and factors for successful simulation integration. The student response rate was 100%. Only (4/22:18.2%) of students completed the required pre-session prerequisite knowledge. Most students (18/22: 81.8%) received the session objectives prior to the simulation session. Qualitative themes included lack of completion of pre-requisite knowledge prior to the session, absence of learning objectives, and technical issues. This study highlights the gap in adequate sequencing of complex simulation scenarios within the curriculum. This is mainly due to the lack of completion of the required prerequisite knowledge prior to the session. Such complex integration requires adequate planning and collaboration of the simulation team with key stakeholders including faculty, the curriculum committee, and instructional designers.
本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐。在本科医学教育中使用基于模拟的教育有许多优点。对于复杂的模拟练习,有必要在课程中对模拟课程的顺序进行有目的的规划。这需要在课前完成必备知识。进行了两项调查。向阿联酋医学院参与模拟教学的教师发送了电子调查问卷(n = 29)。教师调查问卷涉及模拟课程的规划过程、模拟主题的排序以及机构模拟团队的结构。第二项调查通过纸质方式对来自迪拜医学院(DMC)接受模拟课程的最后一年医学生进行(n = 22)。该调查涉及必备知识的完成情况、课程目标的接收情况、心理安全感以及对整个课程的评分。对定量数据进行描述性分析。对开放式问题的回答进行主题分析。教师的回复率为(21/29:72.4%)。只有(7/21:33.3%)的教师表示有事先规划以确保课程内的正确排序。只有(3/21:14.2%)表示模拟主题是根据课程差距选择的。一小部分(3/21:14.2%)报告称与其他教师和教学设计人员合作。定性主题包括规划的障碍、结构考虑因素以及成功整合模拟的因素。学生的回复率为100%。只有(4/22:18.2%)的学生完成了所需的课前必备知识。大多数学生(18/22:81.8%)在模拟课程之前收到了课程目标。定性主题包括课前未完成必备知识、缺乏学习目标以及技术问题。本研究突出了课程中复杂模拟场景适当排序方面的差距。这主要是由于在课前未完成所需的必备知识。这种复杂的整合需要模拟团队与包括教师、课程委员会和教学设计人员在内的关键利益相关者进行充分的规划和协作。