• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰岛素泵治疗与多次每日注射对1型糖尿病儿童血糖控制及糖尿病酮症酸中毒发生率的疗效比较

Effectiveness of Insulin Pump Therapy Versus Multiple Daily Injections for Glycemic Control and Rate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis Among Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Alnaim Nusaybah, Al Ghadeer Hussain A, Al-Bunyan Abdulhameed A, Almulhem Abdulmohsen, Alsaleh Yassin, AlHelal Manal, Almugaizel Ishaq, Alhashim Zahra, Alhamrani Ahmed M, Al Bosrour Zinab A

机构信息

Endocrinology and Diabetes, Maternity and Children Hospital, Al Ahsa, SAU.

Pediatrics, Maternity and Children Hospital, Al Ahsa, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Feb 13;16(2):e54123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54123. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.54123
PMID:38487160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10939104/
Abstract

Background Advances in pump technology and the availability of insulin analogs, as well as the results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), which established the benefit of improved glycemic control, have all contributed to the increased use of insulin pump therapy in recent years, particularly in children. Purpose This research aims to compare the impact of insulin delivery method, i.e., continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDI) on glycemic control and the rate of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) among children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Methods  A retrospective cohort study was carried out in a diabetic center in Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, over 24 months (2020-2022) among children with type I diabetes mellitus (age group 1-14 years). Results  In total, 351 patients with diabetes were induced, with 316 (90%) on MDI and 35 (10%) on CSII. After six months of diagnosis, precisely 38 (12%) of patients with diabetes on the MDI regimen experienced DKA, compared to 4 (11.4%) of those on the CSII regimen, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.918). At six months and nine months of follow-up, the average hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was considerably higher in diabetic patients on MDI (8.9 ± 1.7% vs. 8.2 ± 1.5% and 9.1 ± 1.6% vs. 8.0 ± 1.3%, respectively, with a significant p-value ≤0.05). Conclusion In this study, we found that patients on the MDI regimen had considerably higher HbA1c levels than patients on the CSII regimen, but there was no statistically significant difference in DKA rates between them. This is a short-term follow-up study, and we recommend that patients be followed for a longer period of time for further accurate outcomes.

摘要

背景

泵技术的进步、胰岛素类似物的可得性,以及糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)的结果(该试验证实了改善血糖控制的益处),都促使近年来胰岛素泵疗法的使用有所增加,尤其是在儿童中。

目的

本研究旨在比较胰岛素给药方式,即持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)或多次皮下注射(MDI)对沙特阿拉伯艾哈萨1型糖尿病儿童血糖控制及糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)发生率的影响。

方法

在沙特阿拉伯艾哈萨的一个糖尿病中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为1型糖尿病儿童(年龄1 - 14岁),为期24个月(2020 - 2022年)。

结果

共纳入351例糖尿病患者,其中316例(90%)采用MDI治疗,35例(10%)采用CSII治疗。诊断6个月后,MDI治疗方案的糖尿病患者中有38例(12%)发生DKA,而CSII治疗方案的患者中有4例(11.4%)发生DKA,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.918)。在随访6个月和9个月时,MDI治疗的糖尿病患者平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平显著更高(分别为8.9±1.7%对8.2±1.5%以及9.1±1.6%对8.0±1.3%,p值≤0.05,差异有统计学意义)。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现采用MDI治疗方案的患者HbA1c水平显著高于采用CSII治疗方案的患者,但两者之间的DKA发生率无统计学显著差异。这是一项短期随访研究,我们建议对患者进行更长时间的随访以获得更准确的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/10939104/397afb95b76f/cureus-0016-00000054123-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/10939104/397afb95b76f/cureus-0016-00000054123-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/10939104/397afb95b76f/cureus-0016-00000054123-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Insulin Pump Therapy Versus Multiple Daily Injections for Glycemic Control and Rate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis Among Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.胰岛素泵治疗与多次每日注射对1型糖尿病儿童血糖控制及糖尿病酮症酸中毒发生率的疗效比较
Cureus. 2024 Feb 13;16(2):e54123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54123. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetic Populations: An Evidence-Based Analysis.用于 1 型和 2 型成年糖尿病患者群体的持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)泵:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(20):1-58. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
3
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.1 型糖尿病诊断时采用连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年:SCIPI RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(42):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22420.
4
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs modern multiple injection regimens in type 1 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.1 型糖尿病患者采用持续皮下胰岛素输注与现代多次胰岛素注射方案的比较:随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01326-5. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
Insulin pump therapy is associated with higher rates of mild diabetic ketoacidosis compared to injection therapy: A 2-year Swedish national survey of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.与注射治疗相比,胰岛素泵治疗与轻度糖尿病酮症酸中毒的发生率较高:瑞典对 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年进行的一项为期 2 年的全国性调查。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Nov;23(7):1038-1044. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13377. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
6
Use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes is associated with better clinical engagement but not glycaemic control.对于患有1型糖尿病的青少年成人,持续皮下胰岛素输注与每日多次注射相比,与更好的临床参与度相关,但与血糖控制无关。
Intern Med J. 2023 Feb;53(2):255-261. doi: 10.1111/imj.15539. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
7
The Effectiveness of Insulin Pump Therapy Versus Multiple Daily Injections in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Specialized Center in Riyadh.利雅得某专科医院中胰岛素泵治疗与多次每日注射对1型糖尿病儿童的疗效比较
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022 Oct 20;15:11795514221128495. doi: 10.1177/11795514221128495. eCollection 2022.
8
Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of CSII Versus MDI in Children and Adolescent With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Public Health Care System of China.中国公立医疗体系中 CSII 与 MDI 在儿童和青少年 1 型糖尿病患者中的临床结局和成本效益分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 30;12:604028. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.604028. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of Insulin Pump Therapy and Multiple Daily Injections Insulin Regimen in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes During Ramadan Fasting.斋月禁食期间1型糖尿病患者胰岛素泵治疗与多次皮下注射胰岛素方案的比较
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(6):349-354. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0418. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
Treatment Modality-Dependent Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Danish Adult Diabetes Database Study.治疗方式与 1 型糖尿病患者糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险的相关性:丹麦成人糖尿病数据库研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Mar;20(3):229-234. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0231. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantification of the Anti-diabetic Effect of Allium cepa.洋葱抗糖尿病作用的量化
Cureus. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):e59174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59174. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Insulin Pump Therapy Versus Multiple Daily Injections in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Specialized Center in Riyadh.利雅得某专科医院中胰岛素泵治疗与多次每日注射对1型糖尿病儿童的疗效比较
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022 Oct 20;15:11795514221128495. doi: 10.1177/11795514221128495. eCollection 2022.
2
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
3
A Clinical Overview of Insulin Pump Therapy for the Management of Diabetes: Past, Present, and Future of Intensive Therapy.
胰岛素泵治疗糖尿病的临床概述:强化治疗的过去、现在与未来
Diabetes Spectr. 2019 Aug;32(3):194-204. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0091.
4
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs modern multiple injection regimens in type 1 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.1 型糖尿病患者采用持续皮下胰岛素输注与现代多次胰岛素注射方案的比较:随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01326-5. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
Benefits of Using the i-Port System on Insulin-Treated Patients.在接受胰岛素治疗的患者中使用i-Port系统的益处。
Diabetes Spectr. 2019 Feb;32(1):30-35. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0015.
6
Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Pump Therapy During Five Years of Treatment on Metabolic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.持续皮下胰岛素输注泵治疗对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年五年治疗期间代谢控制的有效性
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2018 Jun 1;10(2):147-152. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.5117. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
7
On type 1 diabetes mellitus pathogenesis.关于1型糖尿病的发病机制。
Endocr Connect. 2018 Jan;7(1):R38-R46. doi: 10.1530/EC-17-0347. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
8
Association of Insulin Pump Therapy vs Insulin Injection Therapy With Severe Hypoglycemia, Ketoacidosis, and Glycemic Control Among Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.胰岛素泵治疗与胰岛素注射治疗在1型糖尿病儿童、青少年及青年成人中与严重低血糖、酮症酸中毒及血糖控制的相关性
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1358-1366. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13994.
9
Relative effectiveness of insulin pump treatment over multiple daily injections and structured education during flexible intensive insulin treatment for type 1 diabetes: cluster randomised trial (REPOSE).1型糖尿病灵活强化胰岛素治疗期间胰岛素泵治疗相对于多次皮下注射和结构化教育的相对有效性:整群随机试验(REPOSE)
BMJ. 2017 Mar 30;356:j1285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1285.
10
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.1型糖尿病患者持续皮下胰岛素输注与每日多次注射的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2017 Jan;55(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1039-x. Epub 2016 Aug 1.