• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ecosystem Services Profiles for Communities Benefitting from Estuarine Habitats along the Massachusetts Coast, USA.美国马萨诸塞州海岸受益于河口栖息地的社区的生态系统服务概况
Ecol Inform. 2023 Nov 1;77:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102182.
2
Who Benefits from National Estuaries? Applying the FEGS Classification System to Identify Ecosystem Services and their Beneficiaries.谁从国家河口受益?应用 FEGS 分类系统来识别生态系统服务及其受益者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 3;16(13):2351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132351.
3
Connecting stakeholder priorities and desired environmental attributes for wetland restoration using ecosystem services and a heat map analysis for communications.利用生态系统服务将利益相关者的优先事项与湿地恢复所需的环境属性相联系,并通过热图分析进行沟通。
Front Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 27;12:1-15. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1290090.
4
Identifying and Aligning Ecosystem Services and Beneficiaries Associated with Best Management Practices in Chesapeake Bay Watershed.识别和调整与切萨皮克湾流域最佳管理实践相关的生态系统服务及其受益者。
Environ Manage. 2022 Feb;69(2):384-409. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01561-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Linking People to Coastal Habitats: A meta-analysis of final ecosystem goods and services on the coast.将人类与沿海栖息地联系起来:对海岸最终生态系统产品和服务的荟萃分析。
Ocean Coast Manag. 2018;165:356-369. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.09.009.
6
Identifying priority ecosystem services in tidal wetland restoration.确定潮汐湿地恢复中的优先生态系统服务。
Front Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 7;12:1-22. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1260447.
7
Recreational beneficiaries and their landscape dependencies across national estuary program sites: Tillamook Bay (OR) and Tampa Bay (FL), USA.美国国家河口计划站点(俄勒冈州的蒂拉穆克湾和佛罗里达州的坦帕湾)的休闲受益者及其景观依存关系
Ecosyst People (Abingdon). 2023 Nov 15;19(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2023.2276756.
8
The final ecosystem goods and services Voltron: the power of tools together.最终的生态系统产品和服务:战神金刚——组合的力量。
Front Ecol Evol. 2023 Dec 21;11:1-16. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1290662.
9
Modeling the effect of water quality on the recreational shellfishing cultural ecosystem service of Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts.建模水质对马萨诸塞州巴泽兹湾娱乐性贝类捕捞文化生态系统服务的影响。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Mar;140:364-373. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.12.047. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
Embedding the value of coastal ecosystem services into climate change adaptation planning.将沿海生态系统服务的价值纳入气候变化适应规划。
PeerJ. 2022 Aug 23;10:e13463. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13463. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying priority ecosystem services in tidal wetland restoration.确定潮汐湿地恢复中的优先生态系统服务。
Front Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 7;12:1-22. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1260447.

本文引用的文献

1
Capturing twenty years of change in ecosystem services provided by coastal Massachusetts habitats.记录马萨诸塞州沿海栖息地提供的生态系统服务二十年的变化。
Ecosyst Serv. 2023 Jun 1;61:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101530.
2
Observational Verification of the Cumulative Resilience Screening Index (CRSI) Using Hurricanes, Inland Floods, and Wildfires From 2016 to 2019.使用2016年至2019年的飓风、内陆洪水和野火对累积复原力筛查指数(CRSI)进行的观测验证
Geohealth. 2022 Oct 1;6(10):e2022GH000660. doi: 10.1029/2022GH000660. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Identifying and Aligning Ecosystem Services and Beneficiaries Associated with Best Management Practices in Chesapeake Bay Watershed.识别和调整与切萨皮克湾流域最佳管理实践相关的生态系统服务及其受益者。
Environ Manage. 2022 Feb;69(2):384-409. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01561-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
What is it about coral reefs? Translation of ecosystem goods and services relevant to people and their well-being.珊瑚礁究竟是什么?与人类及其福祉相关的生态系统产品和服务的翻译。
Ecosphere. 2021 Aug 8;12(8):1-27. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.3639.
5
A Keyword Approach to Finding Common Ground in Community-Based Definitions of Human Well-Being.一种通过关键词寻找基于社区的人类福祉定义中的共同基础的方法。
Hum Ecol. 2017 Dec 1;45(6):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s10745-017-9940-3.
6
Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three U.S. Case Studies.社会因素是景观尺度海岸恢复的关键:来自美国三个案例研究的经验教训。
Sustainability. 2020;12(3). doi: 10.3390/su12030869.
7
Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast.在美国测试生态系统核算:以东南部为例的案例研究。
Ecosyst Serv. 2020 Jun 1;43. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101099.
8
Goals, beneficiaries, and indicators of waterfront revitalization in Great Lakes Areas of Concern and coastal communities.五大湖关注地区及沿海社区滨水区振兴的目标、受益者和指标。
J Great Lakes Res. 2019 Nov 1;45(5):851-863. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2019.07.001.
9
Who Benefits from National Estuaries? Applying the FEGS Classification System to Identify Ecosystem Services and their Beneficiaries.谁从国家河口受益?应用 FEGS 分类系统来识别生态系统服务及其受益者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 3;16(13):2351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132351.
10
Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty-first century.生态修复应在21世纪重新定义。
Restor Ecol. 2017 Sep 24;25(5):668-673. doi: 10.1111/rec.12554.

美国马萨诸塞州海岸受益于河口栖息地的社区的生态系统服务概况

Ecosystem Services Profiles for Communities Benefitting from Estuarine Habitats along the Massachusetts Coast, USA.

作者信息

Yee Susan H, Sharpe Leah M, Branoff Benjamin L, Jackson Chloe A, Cicchetti Giancarlo, Jackson Susan, Pryor Margherita, Shumchenia Emily

机构信息

Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, US Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, USA.

Current Address: Department of Biology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Ecol Inform. 2023 Nov 1;77:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102182.

DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102182
PMID:38487338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10936571/
Abstract

The Massachusetts Bays National Estuary Partnership is one of 28 programs in the United States Environmental Protection Agency's National Estuary Program (NEP) charged with developing and implementing comprehensive plans for protecting and restoring the biological integrity and beneficial uses of their estuarine systems. The Partnership has recently updated their comprehensive management plan to include restoration targets for coastal habitats, and as part of this effort, the program explored how to better demonstrate that recovery of ecological integrity of degraded ecosystems also provides ecosystem services that humans want and need. An essential step was to identify key stakeholders and understand the benefits important to them. The primary objective of the study presented here was to evaluate variability in beneficial uses of estuarine habitats across coastal communities in Massachusetts Bays. We applied a text mining approach to extract ecosystem services concepts from over 1400 community planning documents. We leveraged a Final Ecosystem Goods and Services (FEGS) classification framework and related scoping tool to identify and prioritize the suite of natural resource users and ecosystem services those users care about, based on the relative frequency of mentions in documents. Top beneficiaries included residents, experiencers and viewers, property owners, educators and students, and commercial or recreational fishers. Beneficiaries had a surprising degree of shared interests, with top ecosystem services of broad relevance including for naturalness, fish and shellfish, water movement and navigability, water quality and quantity, aesthetic viewscapes, availability of land for development, flood mitigation, and birds. Community-level priorities that emerged were primarily related to regional differences, the local job industry, and local demographics. Identifying priority ecosystem services from community planning documents provides a starting point for setting locally-relevant restoration goals, designing projects that reflect what stakeholders care about, and supporting post-restoration monitoring in terms of accruing relevant benefits to local communities.

摘要

马萨诸塞湾国家河口伙伴关系是美国环境保护局国家河口计划(NEP)的28个项目之一,负责制定和实施全面计划,以保护和恢复其河口系统的生物完整性及有益用途。该伙伴关系最近更新了其综合管理计划,将沿海栖息地的恢复目标纳入其中。作为这项工作的一部分,该项目探讨了如何更好地证明退化生态系统生态完整性的恢复也能提供人类所需的生态系统服务。关键的一步是确定关键利益相关者,并了解对他们重要的益处。本文所述研究的主要目标是评估马萨诸塞湾沿海社区河口栖息地有益用途的变异性。我们采用文本挖掘方法,从1400多份社区规划文件中提取生态系统服务概念。我们利用最终生态系统产品和服务(FEGS)分类框架及相关范围界定工具,根据文件中提及的相对频率,确定自然资源使用者及其所关注的生态系统服务的类别并进行优先排序。主要受益者包括居民、体验者和观赏者、业主、教育工作者和学生,以及商业或休闲渔民。受益者有着惊人程度的共同利益,最具广泛相关性的顶级生态系统服务包括自然性、鱼类和贝类、水流与通航性、水质与水量、美学景观、可用于开发的土地、防洪以及鸟类。出现的社区层面优先事项主要与区域差异、当地就业行业和当地人口统计数据有关。从社区规划文件中确定优先生态系统服务,为设定与当地相关的恢复目标、设计反映利益相关者所关心内容的项目,以及在为当地社区积累相关效益方面支持恢复后监测提供了一个起点。