Biosecurity Program, The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Risk Anal. 2024 Aug;44(8):1896-1906. doi: 10.1111/risa.14291. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
The origin of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is contentious. Most studies have focused on a zoonotic origin, but definitive evidence such as an intermediary animal host is lacking. We used an established risk analysis tool for differentiating natural and unnatural epidemics, the modified Grunow-Finke assessment tool (mGFT) to study the origin of SARS-COV-2. The mGFT scores 11 criteria to provide a likelihood of natural or unnatural origin. Using published literature and publicly available sources of information, we applied the mGFT to the origin of SARS-CoV-2. The mGFT scored 41/60 points (68%), with high inter-rater reliability (100%), indicating a greater likelihood of an unnatural than natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. This risk assessment cannot prove the origin of SARS-CoV-2 but shows that the possibility of a laboratory origin cannot be easily dismissed.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的起源存在争议。大多数研究都集中在人畜共患病的起源上,但缺乏中间宿主动物等明确证据。我们使用了一种已建立的区分自然和非自然流行的风险分析工具,即改良的 Grunow-Finke 评估工具(mGFT)来研究 SARS-COV-2 的起源。mGFT 对 11 个标准进行评分,以提供自然或非自然起源的可能性。我们使用已发表的文献和公开可用的信息来源,将 mGFT 应用于 SARS-CoV-2 的起源。mGFT 得分为 41/60 分(68%),评分者间的可靠性很高(100%),表明 SARS-CoV-2 的非自然起源的可能性大于自然起源。这种风险评估不能证明 SARS-CoV-2 的起源,但表明实验室起源的可能性不能轻易排除。