Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201, Reus, Catalonia, Spain.
Environ Res. 2021 Sep;200:111785. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111785. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
Since the appearance of the first cases of COVID-19 in 2019, an unprecedented number of documents on that disease have been published in a short space of time. The current available information covers a large number of topics related with COVID-19 and/or the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) responsible of the disease. However, only a limited number of publications have been focused on a controversial issue: the origin of the SARS-CoV-2. In this paper, the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has been reviewed. Documents published during 2020 and 2021 (January 1-July 19) in journals that are indexed in PubMed and/or Scopus has been considered. The revised studies were grouped according to these two potential origins: natural and unnatural. The analyses of the conclusions of the different documents here assessed show that even considering the zoonotic hypothesis as the most likely, with bats and pangolins being possibly in the origin of the coronavirus, today's date the intermediate source species of SARS-CoV-2 has not been confirmed yet. On the other hand, some researchers point to an unnatural origin of this coronavirus, but their conclusions are not strongly supported by a clear scientific evidence. Given the tremendous severity of the current pandemic, investigations to establish clearly and definitively the origin of SARS-CoV-2, are basic and essential in order to prevent potential future pandemics of similar nature.
自 2019 年首次出现 COVID-19 病例以来,在短时间内发表了大量关于该疾病的文献。目前可用的信息涵盖了与 COVID-19 相关的大量主题和/或负责该疾病的冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)。然而,只有少数出版物关注一个有争议的问题:SARS-CoV-2 的起源。本文对 SARS-CoV-2 起源的科学文献进行了综述。考虑了 2020 年和 2021 年(1 月 1 日至 7 月 19 日)在 PubMed 和/或 Scopus 索引的期刊上发表的文献。修订后的研究根据这两个潜在的起源进行了分组:自然起源和非自然起源。对这里评估的不同文件的结论进行分析表明,即使考虑到人畜共患病假说最有可能,蝙蝠和穿山甲可能是冠状病毒的起源,但迄今为止,尚未确认 SARS-CoV-2 的中间源物种。另一方面,一些研究人员指出这种冠状病毒的非自然起源,但他们的结论并没有得到明确科学证据的有力支持。鉴于当前大流行的巨大严重性,为了防止类似性质的未来潜在大流行,明确和明确确定 SARS-CoV-2 的起源的调查是基础和必要的。