• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Online ratings and narrative comments of American Head and Neck Society surgeons.美国头颈外科学会外科医生的在线评分和叙事评论。
Head Neck. 2024 Oct;46(10):2508-2516. doi: 10.1002/hed.27743. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.手外科医生的在线患者评分
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Jan;41(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.10.006.
3
How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?医生的人口统计学特征、培训情况、社交媒体使用情况、网络形象以及候诊时间如何影响脊柱外科医生的在线评价得分?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 23;30(2):279-288. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE18553. Print 2019 Feb 1.
4
Online Ratings and Perceptions of Pediatric Otolaryngologists.在线评价与小儿耳鼻喉科医生的认知。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Oct;131(10):2356-2360. doi: 10.1002/lary.29479. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Virtual reality training for cataract surgery operating performance in ophthalmology trainees.虚拟现实培训在眼科学员白内障手术操作表现中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD014953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014953.pub2.
6
Patients' Online Perception and Ratings of Neurotologists.患者对神经耳科医生的在线看法和评价。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jan;40(1):139-143. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002075.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.预测脊柱外科医生获得患者在线好评的因素。
Spine J. 2019 Jan;19(1):182-185. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.社交媒体、培训和人口统计学如何影响三大脊柱外科医生在线评论网站上的在线评论。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2081-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
10
Is There an Association Between Spine Surgeon Academic Productivity and Patient Satisfaction Ratings?脊柱外科医生的学术产出与患者满意度评分之间存在关联吗?
Neurosurgery. 2024 Dec 9;97(1):98-104. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003292.

引用本文的文献

1
A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.《基于价值的专科护理外科医生指南》
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Aug 25;10(4):e70239. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70239. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis.乳房重建的在线患者评价:RealSelf分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Nov 21;10(11):e4476. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004476. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Factors that determine a Patient's willingness to physician selection in online healthcare communities: A trust theory perspective.在线医疗社区中决定患者选择医生意愿的因素:信任理论视角
Technol Soc. 2021 Feb;64:101510. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101510. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Online selection of a physician by patients: the impression formation perspective.患者在线选择医生:印象形成视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01936-0.
4
Characterizing negative reviews of orthopedic spine surgeons and practices.对骨科脊柱外科医生及医疗行为负面评价的特征分析。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 May 21;11:100126. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100126. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians' Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews.医生性别、患者风险与网络评价:关于医生性别与其网络评价关系的纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 8;24(4):e31659. doi: 10.2196/31659.
6
Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.描述小儿矫形外科医生的负面在线评论。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022;42(5):e533-e537. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002121.
7
An Analysis of Online Ratings of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.儿科骨科医生在线评级分析。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Oct 1;41(9):576-579. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001932.
8
Negative Online Ratings of Joint Replacement Surgeons: An Analysis of 6,402 Reviews.关节置换外科医生的负面在线评价:对6402条评论的分析
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jun 15;9:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.05.005. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Online Ratings of Primary Care Physicians: Comparison of Gender, Training, and Specialty.基层医疗医生的在线评分:性别、培训与专业的比较
J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 23;8:23743735211007700. doi: 10.1177/23743735211007700. eCollection 2021.
10
Use of Online Physician Ratings and Reviews by Older U.S. Adults: Results of a National Survey.美国老年人对在线医生评分和评价的使用:一项全国性调查的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Aug;174(8):1180-1182. doi: 10.7326/M20-7600. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

美国头颈外科学会外科医生的在线评分和叙事评论。

Online ratings and narrative comments of American Head and Neck Society surgeons.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.

School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2024 Oct;46(10):2508-2516. doi: 10.1002/hed.27743. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1002/hed.27743
PMID:38488221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11401960/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We analyzed online rating scores and comments of head and neck surgeons to understand factors that contribute to higher ratings.

METHODS

Numerical ratings and comments for American Head and Neck Society physicians were extracted from Healthgrades, Vitals, RateMDs, and Yelp, with narrative comments categorized based on content. Physician practice location, education, and residency training were also compiled.

RESULTS

Patient ratings were significantly higher with supportive staff and affable physician demeanor but showed significant drops with longer wait times and difficulties scheduling appointments or follow-ups. Physician education and postgraduate training did not significantly affect ratings.

CONCLUSION

Online ratings and comments correlated to modifiable factors in clinical practice and may be informative in understanding patient needs.

摘要

背景

我们分析了头颈外科医生的在线评分和评论,以了解有助于提高评分的因素。

方法

从 Healthgrades、Vitals、RateMDs 和 Yelp 中提取美国头颈学会医生的数字评分和评论,根据内容对评论进行分类。还编制了医生的执业地点、教育和住院医师培训情况。

结果

有支持性工作人员和和蔼可亲的医生风度的患者评分显著更高,但等待时间较长、预约或随访困难则评分显著下降。医生的教育和研究生培训并没有显著影响评分。

结论

在线评分和评论与临床实践中的可修改因素相关,可能有助于了解患者需求。