Suppr超能文献

三药联合治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫的疗效分析。

Effectiveness analysis of three-drug combination therapies for refractory focal epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.

Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.

出版信息

Neurotherapeutics. 2024 Apr;21(3):e00345. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00345. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

Abstract

Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n ​= ​95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n ​= ​48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-0.85; adjusted P ​< ​0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21-1.04; adjusted P ​< ​0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR ​= ​0.67; adjusted P ​= ​0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.

摘要

选择合适的抗癫痫药物(ASM)进行耐药性癫痫(DRE)的联合治疗是一项复杂的任务,需要采用经验方法,特别是在接受多药治疗的患者中。我们旨在分析一组在真实环境下的 DRE 患者中,各种三药联合治疗的效果。这项单中心、纵向观察性研究调查了 2019 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月在同济医院门诊接受三药方案的耐药性局灶性癫痫患者。通过无癫痫发作率和患者内癫痫发作频率比值(SFR<1 表示疗效更好)来评估每种三联方案的疗效。采用独立样本 t 检验或曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行有效性分析,并用 Benjamini-Hochberg 方法对多重比较进行 P 值调整。在 323 名入组患者中,共进行了 511 次三联试验,涉及 76 种不同方案。在这些三联方案中,拉莫三嗪(LTG)/丙戊酸(VPA)/托吡酯(TPM)的应用最为广泛(29.4%,n=95)。在最后一次临床就诊时,接受三联治疗后有 14.9%(n=48)的患者达到了无癫痫发作。LTG/VPA/TPM 和 LTG/VPA/左乙拉西坦(LEV)的无癫痫发作率最高,分别为 17.9%和 12.8%。这两种方案的中位数 SFR 也明显更低,分别为 0.48(四分位距 [IQR],0.17-0.85;调整 P<0.001)和 0.63(IQR,0.21-1.04;调整 P<0.01)。LTG/VPA/吡仑帕奈(PER)是另一种有前途的方案,显示出边缘疗效(中位数 SFR=0.67;调整 P=0.053)。LTG/VPA/苯巴比妥的方案特异性不良反应发生率最高(40.0%,4/10),而 LTG/VPA/LEV 的不良反应发生率最低(5.1%,2/39)。总之,LTG/VPA/TPM 和 LTG/VPA/LEV 在治疗 DRE 患者方面表现出较好的疗效和良好的耐受性。我们的研究结果为在这一具有挑战性的临床人群中选择三药联合治疗的 ASM 提供了初步见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2852/11070276/bbbeca8ed672/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验