Benbadis Selim, Klein Pavel, Schiemann Jimmy, Diaz Anyzeila, Elmoufti Sami, Whitesides John
Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Mar;80:129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) with concomitant use of lamotrigine (LTG) or topiramate (TPM) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.
Data were pooled from three randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III studies (NCT00490035/N01252, NCT00464269/N01253, NCT01261325/N01358) of adults with focal (partial-onset) seizures. Patients taking concomitant levetiracetam were excluded from the efficacy populations, but included in the safety populations. This post-hoc analysis reports data from patients taking BRV in the approved therapeutic range (50-200mg/day) concomitantly with LTG or TPM.
The number of patients in each of the three BRV dosage groups was small, particularly for the TPM subgroup. Mean percent reduction over placebo in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/28days for BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day was 8.7, 5.3, and 8.9 in the LTG subgroup (n=220), and 8.4, 21.3, and -4.2 in the TPM subgroup (n=122). The ≥50% responder rate with concomitant LTG or TPM with BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day or placebo was LTG: 28.1%, 36.1%, 34.1%, and 29.1%; and TPM: 14.3%, 44.4%, 25.0%, and 17.5%. There were numerically ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% responder rates for patients taking BRV ≥50mg/day compared with placebo in both subgroups. In the LTG and TPM safety populations (n=245 versus n=125), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported with LTG 68.7% versus 68.4%, and TPM 65.6% versus 57.8% (BRV ≥50mg/day versus placebo). Discontinuations due to TEAEs versus placebo were LTG 7.3% versus 6.3% and TPM 8.2% versus 4.7%. The three most frequently reported TEAEs for both subgroups were somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Of these, the incidence of fatigue in the LTG population appeared to increase with dose.
In this post-hoc pooled analysis, BRV administered with concomitant LTG or TPM reduced seizure frequency and was generally well tolerated for BRV doses of 50-200mg/day.
评估在局灶性癫痫未得到控制的患者中,添加布瓦西坦(BRV)与拉莫三嗪(LTG)或托吡酯(TPM)联合使用的疗效和安全性。
数据来自三项针对成人局灶性(部分性发作)癫痫的随机、安慰剂对照III期研究(NCT00490035/N01252、NCT00464269/N01253、NCT01261325/N01358)。服用左乙拉西坦的患者被排除在疗效人群之外,但纳入安全性人群。这项事后分析报告了服用处于批准治疗范围(50 - 200mg/天)的BRV并同时服用LTG或TPM的患者的数据。
三个BRV剂量组中的每组患者数量都很少,特别是TPM亚组。在LTG亚组(n = 220)中,BRV 50mg/天、100mg/天和200mg/天组相对于安慰剂,基线调整后的局灶性癫痫发作频率/28天的平均降低百分比分别为8.7%、5.3%和8.9%;在TPM亚组(n = 122)中分别为8.4%、21.3%和 - 4.2%。BRV 50mg/天、100mg/天和200mg/天或安慰剂与LTG或TPM联合使用时,≥50%应答率在LTG组分别为28.1%、36.1%、34.1%和29.1%;在TPM组分别为14.3%、44.4%、25.0%和17.5%。在两个亚组中,服用BRV≥50mg/天的患者与安慰剂相比,在数值上有≥50%、≥75%、≥90%和100%的应答率。在LTG和TPM安全性人群中(分别为n = 245和n = 125),报告的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)在LTG组为68.7%对68.4%,在TPM组为65.6%对57.8%(BRV≥50mg/天对安慰剂)。因TEAE而停药的比例在LTG组为7.3%对6.3%,在TPM组为8.2%对4.7%。两个亚组最常报告的三种TEAE是嗜睡、头晕和疲劳。其中,LTG人群中疲劳的发生率似乎随剂量增加。
在这项事后汇总分析中,与LTG或TPM联合使用的BRV降低了癫痫发作频率,对于50 - 200mg/天的BRV剂量,总体耐受性良好。