Ikawa Haruki, Osawa Ryota, Takeda Yuya, Sato Akiko, Mizuno Hoshimi, Noda Yoshihiro
Tokyo Yokohama TMS Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 4;10(5):e27288. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27288. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
Despite the prevalence of empirical practice, evidence supporting the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating bipolar depression (BD) is sparse compared to that for unipolar depression. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a retrospective observational analysis using TMS registry data to compare the efficacy of rTMS treatment for BD and unipolar depression. Data from 20 patients diagnosed with unipolar and BD were retrospectively extracted from the TMS registry to ensure age and sex matching. The primary outcomes of this registry study were measured using the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Analysis did not reveal significant differences between the two groups in terms of depression severity, motor threshold, or stimulus intensity at baseline. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in absolute or relative changes in the total HAM-D and MADRS scores. Furthermore, the response and remission rates following rTMS treatment did not differ significantly between groups. The only adverse event reported in this study was scalp pain at the stimulation site; however, the incidence and severity were not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, this retrospective study, using real-world TMS registry data, suggests that rTMS treatment for BD could be as effective as that for unipolar depression. These findings underscore the need for further validation in prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes.
尽管经验性治疗普遍存在,但与单相抑郁相比,支持重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗双相抑郁(BD)的证据仍然很少。因此,本研究旨在利用TMS注册数据进行回顾性观察分析,以比较rTMS治疗BD和单相抑郁的疗效。从TMS注册库中回顾性提取了20例诊断为单相抑郁和双相抑郁患者的数据,以确保年龄和性别匹配。本注册研究的主要结局采用21项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)进行测量。分析未发现两组在基线时的抑郁严重程度、运动阈值或刺激强度方面存在显著差异。同样,在HAM-D和MADRS总分的绝对或相对变化方面也未观察到显著差异。此外,rTMS治疗后的缓解率和反应率在两组之间也没有显著差异。本研究报告的唯一不良事件是刺激部位的头皮疼痛;然而,两组之间的发生率和严重程度没有显著差异。总之,这项使用真实世界TMS注册数据的回顾性研究表明,rTMS治疗BD可能与治疗单相抑郁一样有效。这些发现强调了在更大样本量的前瞻性随机对照试验中进行进一步验证的必要性。