Opara Uchechi Clara, Petrucka Pammla
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2024 Mar 14;11:23333936241238097. doi: 10.1177/23333936241238097. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Choosing an appropriate qualitative methodology in nursing research is a researcher's first step before beginning a study. Such a step is critical as the selected qualitative methodology should be congruent with the research questions, study assumptions, data gathering and analysis to promote the utility of such research in enhancing nursing knowledge. In this paper, we compare focused ethnography by Roper and Shapira and interpretive phenomenology by Benner. Though these methodologies are naturalistic and appear similar, both have different methodological underpinnings. The historical, ontological, epistemological, and axiological philosophy guiding each methodology are described. In addition, the methodological underpinnings of both methodologies and a justification for use in nursing research are provided. This paper will assist future researchers who aim to employ these methodologies in nursing research.
在护理研究中选择合适的定性研究方法是研究者开展研究的第一步。这一步至关重要,因为所选的定性研究方法应与研究问题、研究假设、数据收集和分析相一致,以提高此类研究在增进护理知识方面的效用。在本文中,我们比较了罗珀和夏皮拉的聚焦民族志以及本纳的诠释现象学。尽管这些方法都是自然主义的且看似相似,但两者有着不同的方法论基础。描述了指导每种方法的历史、本体论、认识论和价值论哲学。此外,还提供了两种方法的方法论基础以及在护理研究中使用的理由。本文将帮助未来旨在在护理研究中采用这些方法的研究者。