Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
JAMA. 2024 Feb 20;331(7):582-591. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27693.
Maternal milk feeding of extremely preterm infants during the birth hospitalization has been associated with better neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with preterm formula. For infants receiving no or minimal maternal milk, it is unknown whether donor human milk conveys similar neurodevelopmental advantages vs preterm formula.
To determine if nutrient-fortified, pasteurized donor human milk improves neurodevelopmental outcomes at 22 to 26 months' corrected age compared with preterm infant formula among extremely preterm infants who received minimal maternal milk.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at 15 US academic medical centers within the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Infants younger than 29 weeks 0 days' gestation or with a birth weight of less than 1000 g were enrolled between September 2012 and March 2019.
Preterm formula or donor human milk feeding from randomization to 120 days of age, death, or hospital discharge.
The primary outcome was the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) cognitive score measured at 22 to 26 months' corrected age; a score of 54 (score range, 54-155; a score of ≥85 indicates no neurodevelopmental delay) was assigned to infants who died between randomization and 22 to 26 months' corrected age. The 24 secondary outcomes included BSID language and motor scores, in-hospital growth, necrotizing enterocolitis, and death.
Of 1965 eligible infants, 483 were randomized (239 in the donor milk group and 244 in the preterm formula group); the median gestational age was 26 weeks (IQR, 25-27 weeks), the median birth weight was 840 g (IQR, 676-986 g), and 52% were female. The birthing parent's race was self-reported as Black for 52% (247/478), White for 43% (206/478), and other for 5% (25/478). There were 54 infants who died prior to follow-up; 88% (376/429) of survivors were assessed at 22 to 26 months' corrected age. The adjusted mean BSID cognitive score was 80.7 (SD, 17.4) for the donor milk group vs 81.1 (SD, 16.7) for the preterm formula group (adjusted mean difference, -0.77 [95% CI, -3.93 to 2.39], which was not significant); the adjusted mean BSID language and motor scores also did not differ. Mortality (death prior to follow-up) was 13% (29/231) in the donor milk group vs 11% (25/233) in the preterm formula group (adjusted risk difference, -1% [95% CI, -4% to 2%]). Necrotizing enterocolitis occurred in 4.2% of infants (10/239) in the donor milk group vs 9.0% of infants (22/244) in the preterm formula group (adjusted risk difference, -5% [95% CI, -9% to -2%]). Weight gain was slower in the donor milk group (22.3 g/kg/d [95% CI, 21.3 to 23.3 g/kg/d]) compared with the preterm formula group (24.6 g/kg/d [95% CI, 23.6 to 25.6 g/kg/d]).
Among extremely preterm neonates fed minimal maternal milk, neurodevelopmental outcomes at 22 to 26 months' corrected age did not differ between infants fed donor milk or preterm formula.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01534481.
与早产儿配方奶粉相比,母亲在分娩住院期间喂养极度早产儿的母乳与更好的神经发育结果相关。对于接受极少或没有母乳的婴儿,尚不清楚捐赠人乳是否与早产儿配方奶粉相比具有类似的神经发育优势。
确定在接受极少母乳的极度早产儿中,与早产儿配方奶粉相比,强化巴氏消毒的捐赠人乳是否能改善神经发育结果,在 22 至 26 个月的校正年龄时。
设计、地点和参与者:在 Eunice Kennedy Shriver 国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络的 15 个美国学术医疗中心进行的双盲、随机临床试验。29 周 0 天或出生体重不足 1000 克的婴儿于 2012 年 9 月至 2019 年 3 月期间入组。
从随机分组到 120 天龄、死亡或出院,接受早产儿配方奶粉或捐赠人乳喂养。
主要结局是在 22 至 26 个月的校正年龄时用贝利婴幼儿发展量表(BSID)评估的认知评分;将在随机分组至 22 至 26 个月的校正年龄之间死亡的婴儿分配 54 分(评分范围为 54-155;评分≥85 表示无神经发育迟缓)。24 个次要结局包括 BSID 语言和运动评分、住院期间生长、坏死性小肠结肠炎和死亡。
在 1965 名符合条件的婴儿中,483 名被随机分组(捐赠人乳组 239 名,早产儿配方奶粉组 244 名);中位胎龄为 26 周(IQR,25-27 周),中位出生体重为 840 克(IQR,676-986 克),52%为女性。分娩父母的种族自报为黑人占 52%(247/478),白人占 43%(206/478),其他种族占 5%(25/478)。有 54 名婴儿在随访前死亡;88%(376/429)的幸存者在 22 至 26 个月的校正年龄时接受了评估。捐赠人乳组的平均 BSID 认知评分调整后为 80.7(SD,17.4),早产儿配方奶粉组为 81.1(SD,16.7)(调整后平均差异,-0.77 [95% CI,-3.93 至 2.39],差异无统计学意义);BSID 语言和运动评分也没有差异。捐赠人乳组的死亡率(随访前死亡)为 13%(29/231),早产儿配方奶粉组为 11%(25/233)(调整后风险差异,-1% [95% CI,-4%至 2%])。坏死性小肠结肠炎在捐赠人乳组的发生率为 4.2%(10/239),早产儿配方奶粉组为 9.0%(22/244)(调整后风险差异,-5% [95% CI,-9%至-2%])。捐赠人乳组的体重增加速度较慢(22.3 g/kg/d [95% CI,21.3 至 23.3 g/kg/d]),而早产儿配方奶粉组(24.6 g/kg/d [95% CI,23.6 至 25.6 g/kg/d])。
在接受极少母乳的极度早产儿中,接受捐赠人乳或早产儿配方奶粉喂养的婴儿在 22 至 26 个月的校正年龄时的神经发育结果没有差异。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01534481。