Suppr超能文献

微爆型迷走神经刺激疗法治疗耐药性局灶性和全面性癫痫的可行性研究。

Feasibility study of microburst VNS therapy in drug-resistant focal and generalized epilepsy.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Neurology, Phoenix, AZ, USA; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Aurora, CO, USA.

University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Weill-Cornell Medicine, Department of Neurology, New York, NY, USA; University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2024 Mar-Apr;17(2):382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at low frequencies (≤30 Hz) has been an established treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for over 25 years.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the initial safety and efficacy performance of an investigational, high-frequency (≥250 Hz) VNS paradigm herein called "Microburst VNS" (μVNS). μVNS consists of short, high-frequency bursts of electrical pulses believed to preferentially modulate certain brain regions.

METHODS

Thirty-three (33) participants were enrolled into an exploratory feasibility study, 21 with focal-onset seizures and 12 with generalized-onset seizures. Participants were titrated to a personalized target dose of μVNS using an investigational fMRI protocol. Participants were then followed for up to 12 months, with visits every 3 months, and monitored for side-effects at all time points. This study was registered as NCT03446664 on February 27th, 2018.

RESULTS

The device was well-tolerated. Reported adverse events were consistent with typical low frequency VNS outcomes and tended to diminish in severity over time, including dysphonia, cough, dyspnea, and implant site pain. After 12 months of μVNS, the mean seizure frequency reduction for all seizures was 61.3% (median reduction: 70.4%; 90% CI of median: 48.9%-83.3%). The 12-month responder rate (≥50% reduction) was 63.3% (90% CI: 46.7%-77.9%) and the super-responder rate (≥80% reduction) was 40% (90% CI: 25.0%-56.6%). Participants with focal-onset seizures appeared to benefit similarly to participants with generalized-onset seizures (mean reduction in seizures at 12 months: 62.6% focal [n = 19], versus 59.0% generalized [n = 11]).

CONCLUSION

Overall, μVNS appears to be safe and potentially a promising therapeutic alternative to traditional VNS. It merits further investigation in randomized controlled trials which will help determine the impact of investigational variables and which patients are most suitable for this novel therapy.

摘要

背景

迷走神经刺激(VNS)在低频(≤30 Hz)下已被确立为治疗耐药性癫痫(DRE)超过 25 年的一种治疗方法。

目的

检查一种新的高频(≥250 Hz)VNS 模式的初始安全性和疗效表现,在此称为“微爆发 VNS”(μVNS)。μVNS 由电脉冲的短、高频爆发组成,据信可优先调节某些大脑区域。

方法

33 名参与者被纳入一项探索性可行性研究,其中 21 名患有局灶性发作性癫痫,12 名患有全面性发作性癫痫。参与者使用一项新的 fMRI 方案滴定至个性化的 μVNS 目标剂量。然后,参与者随访长达 12 个月,每 3 个月进行一次随访,并在所有时间点监测副作用。这项研究于 2018 年 2 月 27 日在 NCT03446664 上注册。

结果

该设备耐受性良好。报告的不良事件与典型的低频 VNS 结果一致,且随着时间的推移趋于减轻,包括发音困难、咳嗽、呼吸困难和植入部位疼痛。在 12 个月的 μVNS 后,所有癫痫发作的平均癫痫发作频率降低了 61.3%(中位数降低:70.4%;90%CI 中位数:48.9%-83.3%)。12 个月的应答率(≥50%的减少)为 63.3%(90%CI:46.7%-77.9%),超级应答率(≥80%的减少)为 40%(90%CI:25.0%-56.6%)。局灶性发作性癫痫患者似乎与全面性发作性癫痫患者受益相似(12 个月时癫痫发作的平均减少:局灶性[n=19]为 62.6%,全面性[n=11]为 59.0%)。

结论

总体而言,μVNS 似乎是安全的,并且可能是传统 VNS 的一种有前途的治疗替代方法。它值得在随机对照试验中进一步研究,这将有助于确定研究变量的影响以及哪些患者最适合这种新疗法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验