Liu Helen, Zhong Haoyan, Zubizarreta Nicole, Cagle Paul, Liu Jiabin, Poeran Jashvant, Memtsoudis Stavros G
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 May 6;50(5):390-401. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104984.
Multimodal analgesia has been associated with reduced opioid utilization, opioid-related complications, and improved recovery in various orthopedic surgeries; however, large sample size data is lacking for shoulder surgery.
A retrospective review using the Premier Healthcare Database of patients who underwent inpatient or outpatient (reverse, total, partial) shoulder arthroplasty from 2010 to 2019. Opioid-only analgesia was compared with multimodal analgesia, categorized into 1, 2, or >2 additional analgesic modes, with/without a nerve block. Multivariable regression models measured associations between multimodal analgesia and opioid charges (in oral morphine equivalents (OME)), cost and length of stay, and opioid-related adverse effects (approximated by naloxone use). We report % change and 95% CIs.
Among 176 225 procedures, 169 679 (75.7% multimodal analgesia use) and 6546 (37.8% multimodal analgesia use) were inpatient and outpatient shoulder arthroplasties, respectively. Among inpatients, multimodal analgesia (>2 modes) without a nerve block (vs opioid-only analgesia) was associated with adjusted reductions in OMEs on postoperative day 1: -19.4% (95% CI -21.2% to -17.6%/representing unadjusted median OME reductions from 45 to 30 mg). For total hospitalization, this was -6.0% (95% CI -7.2% to -4.9%/representing unadjusted median OME reductions from 173 to 135 mg). Conversely, for outpatients, this was +13.7% change in OMEs (95% CI +4.4% to +23.0%/representing unadjusted median OME increases from 110 to 131 mg). In both settings, addition of a nerve block to multimodal analgesia attenuated effects in terms of opioid charges.
Multimodal analgesia is associated with reductions in opioid charges-specifically inpatient setting-but not various other outcomes.
多模式镇痛与多种骨科手术中阿片类药物使用量减少、阿片类药物相关并发症减少及恢复改善相关;然而,肩部手术缺乏大样本量数据。
使用Premier医疗数据库对2010年至2019年接受住院或门诊(翻修、全肩关节、部分肩关节)置换术的患者进行回顾性研究。将单纯阿片类药物镇痛与多模式镇痛进行比较,多模式镇痛分为额外增加1种、2种或超过2种镇痛方式,有或无神经阻滞。多变量回归模型测量多模式镇痛与阿片类药物费用(以口服吗啡当量(OME)计)、成本和住院时间以及阿片类药物相关不良反应(以纳洛酮使用情况估算)之间的关联。我们报告百分比变化及95%置信区间。
在176225例手术中,住院和门诊肩关节置换术分别有169679例(多模式镇痛使用率75.7%)和6546例(多模式镇痛使用率37.8%)。在住院患者中,无神经阻滞的多模式镇痛(超过2种模式)(与单纯阿片类药物镇痛相比)与术后第1天OME调整后减少相关:-19.4%(95%置信区间-21.2%至-17.6%/代表未调整的OME中位数从45毫克降至30毫克)。对于整个住院期间,这一比例为-6.0%(95%置信区间-7.2%至-4.9%/代表未调整的OME中位数从173毫克降至135毫克)。相反,对于门诊患者,OME变化为+13.7%(95%置信区间+4.4%至+23.0%/代表未调整的OME中位数从110毫克增至131毫克)。在两种情况下,多模式镇痛中添加神经阻滞在阿片类药物费用方面减弱了效果。
多模式镇痛与阿片类药物费用减少相关——特别是在住院患者中——但与其他多种结果无关。