• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金钱与意义:创伤后中心专用护理的财务论据。

Dollars and Sense: The Financial Argument for Dedicated Posttrauma Center Care.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care (AG, PY, DHL), Department of Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

Department of Hospital Finance, University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2024 Aug 1;280(2):340-344. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006275. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006275
PMID:38501251
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate that the creation of a Center for Trauma Survivorship (CTS) is not cost-prohibitive but is a revenue generator for the institution.

BACKGROUND

A dedicated CTS has been demonstrated to increase adherence with follow-up visits and improve overall aftercare in severely injured patients discharged from the trauma center. A potential impediment to the creation of similar centers is its assumed prohibitive cost.

METHODS

This pre and post-cohort study examines the financial impact of patients treated by the CTS. Patients in the PRE cohort were those treated in the year before CTS inception. Eligibility criteria are trauma patients admitted who are ≥18 years of age and have a New Injury Severity Score ≥16 or intensive care unit stay ≥2 days. Financial data were obtained from the hospital's billing and cost accounting systems for a 1-year time period after discharge.

RESULTS

There were 176 patients in the PRE and 256 in the CTS cohort. The CTS cohort generated 1623 subsequent visits versus 748 in the PRE cohort. CTS patients underwent more follow-up surgery in their first year of recovery as compared with the PRE cohort (98 vs 26 procedures). Each CTS patient was responsible for a $7752 increase in net revenue with a positive contribution margin of $4558 compared with those in the PRE group.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated CTS increases subsequent visits and necessary procedures and is a positive revenue source for the trauma center. The presumptive financial burden of a CTS is incorrect and the creation of dedicated centers will improve patients' outcomes and the institution's bottom line.

摘要

目的

证明创建创伤幸存者中心(CTS)不会增加成本,反而会为机构带来收入。

背景

已证明,专门的 CTS 可提高严重创伤患者从创伤中心出院后的随访依从性,并改善整体康复护理。创建类似中心的一个潜在障碍是其假设的高昂成本。

方法

本研究采用前后队列设计,研究了 CTS 治疗患者的财务影响。PRE 队列中的患者是在 CTS 成立前一年接受治疗的患者。纳入标准为:年龄≥18 岁且新损伤严重程度评分≥16 分或入住重症监护病房≥2 天的创伤患者。财务数据来自出院后 1 年的医院计费和成本核算系统。

结果

PRE 队列中有 176 例患者,CTS 队列中有 256 例患者。CTS 队列在恢复的第一年产生了 1623 次后续就诊,而 PRE 队列只有 748 次。与 PRE 队列相比,CTS 患者在第一年的康复期间接受了更多的后续手术(98 次与 26 次手术)。与 PRE 组相比,每位 CTS 患者增加了 7752 美元的净收入,边际贡献为 4558 美元。

结论

专门的 CTS 可增加后续就诊和必要的手术次数,是创伤中心的正向收入来源。对 CTS 产生的财务负担的假设是不正确的,创建专门的中心将改善患者的预后并改善机构的底线。

相似文献

1
Dollars and Sense: The Financial Argument for Dedicated Posttrauma Center Care.金钱与意义:创伤后中心专用护理的财务论据。
Ann Surg. 2024 Aug 1;280(2):340-344. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006275. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
2
Center for Trauma Survivorship improves postdischarge follow-up and retention.创伤后生存中心改善了出院后的随访和保留率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jul 1;93(1):118-123. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003634. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
The Center for Trauma Survivorship: Addressing the great unmet need for posttrauma center care.创伤后幸存者中心:满足创伤后中心护理的巨大未满足需求。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Nov;89(5):940-946. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002775.
4
Trauma center finances and length of stay: identifying a profitability inflection point.创伤中心的财务状况和住院时间:确定盈利能力的转折点。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):817-21, 821-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.030.
5
The implications of alcohol intoxication and the Uniform Policy Provision Law on trauma centers; a national trauma data bank analysis of minimally injured patients.酒精中毒及《统一政策条款法》对创伤中心的影响;一项关于轻伤患者的国家创伤数据库分析
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):495-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818234bf.
6
Trauma services: a profit center?创伤服务:一个利润中心?
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Apr;188(4):349-54. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00021-6.
7
Excessively long hospital stays after trauma are not related to the severity of illness: let's aim to the right target!创伤后过长的住院时间与疾病严重程度无关:让我们把目标对准正确的目标!
JAMA Surg. 2013 Oct;148(10):956-61. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2148.
8
Outcome and cost of trauma among the elderly: a real-life model of a single-payer reimbursement system.老年人创伤的结局与成本:单一支付者报销系统的真实模型
J Trauma. 1998 Oct;45(4):800-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199810000-00033.
9
Costs of Transfer From Nontrauma to Trauma Centers Among Patients With Minor Injuries.非创伤患者转入创伤中心的成本:轻微损伤患者。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2434172. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34172.
10
Acute costs and predictors of higher treatment costs of trauma in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州创伤的急性成本及更高治疗成本的预测因素。
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):279-84. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 23.