• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[A clinical-radiomics nomogram for differentiating focal organizing pneumonia and lung adenocarcinoma].[用于鉴别局灶性机化性肺炎和肺腺癌的临床-影像组学列线图]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 Feb 20;44(2):397-404. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.02.23.
2
Nomogram Using CT Radiomics Features for Differentiation of Pneumonia-Type Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma and Pneumonia: Multicenter Development and External Validation Study.使用CT影像组学特征鉴别肺炎型侵袭性黏液腺癌与肺炎的列线图:多中心开发与外部验证研究
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Feb;220(2):224-234. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28139. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
3
Combined model of radiomics and clinical features for differentiating pneumonic-type mucinous adenocarcinoma from lobar pneumonia: An exploratory study.基于影像组学与临床特征的联合模型鉴别黏液型腺泡为主型浸润性腺癌与大叶性肺炎:一项探索性研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 16;13:997921. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.997921. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of Radiomics Models Based on Computed Tomography for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules.基于 CT 的影像组学模型鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节的评价。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022;46(6):978-985. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001352. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
A CT-based nomogram for differentiating invasive fungal disease of the lung from bacterial pneumonia.基于 CT 的肺部侵袭性真菌感染与细菌性肺炎鉴别列线图
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Oct 3;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00903-5.
6
A radiomics nomogram prediction for survival of patients with "driver gene-negative" lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD).一种针对“无驱动基因”肺腺癌(LUAD)患者生存的放射组学列线图预测模型。
Radiol Med. 2023 Jun;128(6):714-725. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01643-4. Epub 2023 May 23.
7
Preoperative diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules in lung cancer screening with a radiomics nomogram.肺癌筛查中基于放射组学列线图的恶性肺结节术前诊断。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020 Jan;40(1):16-24. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12002. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Differentiation of focal organising pneumonia and peripheral adenocarcinoma in solid lung lesions using thin-section CT-based radiomics.基于薄层 CT 影像组学区分肺部局灶性机化性肺炎和周围型腺癌
Clin Radiol. 2019 Jan;74(1):78.e23-78.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
Additional value of metabolic parameters to PET/CT-based radiomics nomogram in predicting lymphovascular invasion and outcome in lung adenocarcinoma.代谢参数对基于 PET/CT 影像组学列线图预测肺腺癌血管淋巴管侵犯及预后的附加价值。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jan;48(1):217-230. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04747-5. Epub 2020 May 25.
10
An AI-based radiomics nomogram for disease prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia using initial CT images and clinical indicators.基于人工智能的放射组学列线图,用于使用初始 CT 图像和临床指标预测 COVID-19 肺炎患者的疾病预后。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Oct;154:104545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104545. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiomics as a non-invasive adjunct to Chest CT in distinguishing benign and malignant lung nodules.放射组学作为一种非侵入性的胸部 CT 辅助手段,用于区分良恶性肺结节。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 4;13(1):19062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46391-7.
2
Three dimensional computed tomography texture analysis of pulmonary lesions: Does radiomics allow differentiation between carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor and organizing pneumonia?肺部病变的三维 CT 纹理分析:放射组学是否能区分癌、神经内分泌肿瘤和机化性肺炎?
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110931. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110931. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
The Intersection of Lung Cancer Screening, Radiomics, and Artificial Intelligence: Can One Scan Really Predict the Future Development of Lung Cancer?肺癌筛查、影像组学与人工智能的交叉:一次扫描真的能预测肺癌的未来发展吗?
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;41(12):2141-2143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02885. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查。
Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):390-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01694-4. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
5
Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia.隐源性机化性肺炎
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 17;386(11):1058-1069. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2116777.
6
Algorithmic Approach to the Diagnosis of Organizing Pneumonia: A Correlation of Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Features.机化性肺炎诊断的算法方法:临床、放射学和病理学特征的相关性
Chest. 2022 Jul;162(1):156-178. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.659. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
7
Comparison of Spectral and Perfusion Computed Tomography Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Cancer and Focal Organizing Pneumonia.光谱与灌注计算机断层扫描成像在周围型肺癌与局灶性机化性肺炎鉴别诊断中的比较
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 27;11:690254. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.690254. eCollection 2021.
8
Secondary organizing pneumonia after recovery of mild COVID-19 infection.轻度 COVID-19 感染康复后发生的机化性肺炎。
J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):417-423. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27360. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
9
[F-FDG PET/CT manifestations of massive type active pulmonary tuberculosis and its differentiation from lung cancer].[大片型活动性肺结核的F-FDG PET/CT表现及其与肺癌的鉴别诊断]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2020 Jan 30;40(1):49-55. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.01.08.
10
Lung cancer: some progress, but still a lot more to do.肺癌:虽有进展,但仍任重道远。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1880. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32795-3.

[用于鉴别局灶性机化性肺炎和肺腺癌的临床-影像组学列线图]

[A clinical-radiomics nomogram for differentiating focal organizing pneumonia and lung adenocarcinoma].

作者信息

Liu Y, Li C, Guo J, Liu Y

机构信息

Graduate School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery of First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 Feb 20;44(2):397-404. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.02.23.

DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.02.23
PMID:38501426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10954529/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of a clinical-radiomics model for differentiating focal organizing pneumonia (FOP) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 60 patients with FOP confirmed by postoperative pathology at the First Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January, 2019 to December, 2022, who were matched with 120 LUAD patients using propensity score matching in a 1∶2 ratio. The independent risk factors for FOP were identified by logistic regression analysis of the patients' clinical data. The cohort was divided into a training set (144 patients) and a test set (36 patients) by random sampling. Python 3.7 was used for extracting 1835 features from CT image data of the patients. The radiographic features and clinical data were used to construct the model, whose performance was validated using ROC curves in both the training and test sets. The diagnostic efficacy of the model for FOP and LUAD was evaluated and a diagnostic nomogram was constructed.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed that an history of was an independent risk factor for FOP (=0.016), which was correlated with none of the hematological findings ( > 0.05). Feature extraction and dimensionality reduction in radiomics yielded 30 significant labels for distinguishing the two diseases. The top 3 most discriminative radiomics labels were GraylevelNonUniformity, SizeZoneNonUniformity and shape-Sphericity. The clinical-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.909 (95% : 0.855-0.963) in the training set and 0.901 (95% : 0.803-0.999) in the test set. The model showed a sensitivity of 85.4%, a specificity of 83.5%, and an accuracy of 84.0% in the training set, as compared with 94.7%, 70.6%, and 83.3% in the test set, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The clinical-radiomics nomogram model shows a good performance for differential diagnosis of FOP and LUAD and may help to minimize misdiagnosis-related overtreatment and improve the patients' outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估一种临床影像组学模型鉴别局灶性机化性肺炎(FOP)和肺腺癌(LUAD)的性能。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2022年12月在中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心经术后病理确诊的60例FOP患者的数据,这些患者与120例LUAD患者采用倾向得分匹配法按1∶2的比例进行匹配。通过对患者临床数据进行逻辑回归分析确定FOP的独立危险因素。通过随机抽样将队列分为训练集(144例患者)和测试集(36例患者)。使用Python 3.7从患者的CT图像数据中提取1835个特征。利用影像特征和临床数据构建模型,并在训练集和测试集中使用ROC曲线验证其性能。评估该模型对FOP和LUAD的诊断效能并构建诊断列线图。

结果

统计分析显示,[此处原文缺失具体内容]是FOP的独立危险因素(P = 0.016),且与血液学检查结果均无相关性(P>0.05)。影像组学中的特征提取和降维产生了30个区分这两种疾病的显著标签。最具鉴别力的前3个影像组学标签是灰度非均匀性、大小区域非均匀性和形状 - 球形度。临床影像组学模型在训练集中的AUC为0.909(95%CI:0.855 - 0.963),在测试集中为0.901(95%CI:0.803 - 0.999)。该模型在训练集中的敏感性为85.4%,特异性为83.5%,准确性为84.0%,而在测试集中分别为94.7%、70.6%和83.3%。

结论

临床影像组学列线图模型在FOP和LUAD的鉴别诊断中表现良好,可能有助于最大限度减少与误诊相关的过度治疗并改善患者预后。