From the Department of Imaging, The Affiliated Huaian First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian.
Institute of precision medicine, General Electric Healthcare China, Shanghai, China.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022;46(6):978-985. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001352. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
The aim of the study was to investigate the diagnostic value of radiomics models based on computed tomography (CT) in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical and imaging data of 172 patients with pathology-confirmed thyroid nodules (83 benign nodules and 89 malignant nodules). All patients underwent a plain CT scan + arterial and venous contrast enhancement before the operation. Using the stratified random sampling method, patients were divided into a training group (121 cases) and a test group (51 cases) at a ratio of 7:3. A.K. software was used to extract radiomics features from the preoperative CT images, and minimum redundancy maximum relevance and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses were then used for feature screening and model construction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the training and test groups to verify model performance and evaluate the efficacy of the radiomics features in identifying benign and malignant thyroid nodules. We then used the most efficient models to construct a nomogram. For the training group, 1-way analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to screen statistically significant clinical features, and the radiomics scores were combined to construct a radiomics nomogram. We used ROC curve analysis to evaluate the predictive performance of the model.
Screening yielded 21 radiomics features that were used to construct a model for differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. For the training group, the area under the ROC curve of the prediction models for the noncontrast, arterial phase, and venous phase scans were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.92), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.94), respectively, and the corresponding diagnostic accuracy was 0.78, 0.84, and 0.83. For the test group, the corresponding 3-phase under the ROC curves for the test group were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.63-0.90), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.91), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62-0.90), and the corresponding accuracy was 0.63, 0.77, and 0.75. Thus, the arterial phase model exhibited the best diagnostic performance. The multivariate logistic regression results showed that morphology regularity and the cystic degeneration ratio were independent clinical risk factors for predicting benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The arterial phase radiomics score and clinically independent factors were then used to construct a nomogram. The nomogram had good discriminability for the training group (0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) and the test group (0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95), achieving significantly higher accuracies than the radiomics score and clinical characteristics alone.
The radiomics nomogram constructed by combining radiomics characteristics and clinical risk factors was efficacious for distinguishing benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
本研究旨在探讨基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的放射组学模型在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节中的诊断价值。
我们对 172 例经病理证实的甲状腺结节患者(83 例良性结节和 89 例恶性结节)的临床和影像学资料进行了回顾性分析。所有患者均在术前进行平扫 CT+动脉期和静脉期增强扫描。采用分层随机抽样法,将患者按 7:3 的比例分为训练组(121 例)和测试组(51 例)。使用 A.K.软件从术前 CT 图像中提取放射组学特征,然后采用最小冗余最大相关性和最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归分析进行特征筛选和模型构建。为验证模型性能并评估放射组学特征在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节中的效能,分别为训练组和测试组构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。然后,我们使用最有效的模型构建列线图。对于训练组,采用单因素方差分析和多因素逻辑回归分析筛选有统计学意义的临床特征,并结合放射组学评分构建放射组学列线图。采用 ROC 曲线分析评估模型的预测性能。
筛选出 21 个放射组学特征,用于构建鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节的模型。对于训练组,非增强扫描、动脉期和静脉期扫描预测模型的 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.86(95%置信区间[CI]:0.79-0.92)、0.89(95%CI:0.83-0.95)和 0.88(95%CI:0.82-0.94),相应的诊断准确率分别为 0.78、0.84 和 0.83。对于测试组,相应的 3 个相位 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.76(95%CI:0.63-0.90)、0.78(95%CI:0.65-0.91)和 0.76(95%CI:0.62-0.90),相应的准确率分别为 0.63、0.77 和 0.75。因此,动脉期模型的诊断性能最佳。多因素逻辑回归结果显示,形态规则性和囊性变性比例是预测甲状腺良恶性结节的独立临床危险因素。然后,将动脉期放射组学评分和临床独立因素用于构建列线图。该列线图对训练组(0.93;95%CI:0.88-0.98)和测试组(0.84;95%CI:0.73-0.95)均具有良好的判别能力,其准确性明显高于放射组学评分和临床特征单独使用时的准确性。
结合放射组学特征和临床危险因素构建的放射组学列线图可有效鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节。