• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于匹配的机器学习方法估计具有生存结局的最优动态治疗方案。

A matching-based machine learning approach to estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes with time-to-event outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 May;33(5):794-806. doi: 10.1177/09622802241236954. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1177/09622802241236954
PMID:38502008
Abstract

Observational data (e.g. electronic health records) has become increasingly important in evidence-based research on dynamic treatment regimes, which tailor treatments over time to patients based on their characteristics and evolving clinical history. It is of great interest for clinicians and statisticians to identify an optimal dynamic treatment regime that can produce the best expected clinical outcome for each individual and thus maximize the treatment benefit over the population. Observational data impose various challenges for using statistical tools to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Notably, the task becomes more sophisticated when the clinical outcome of primary interest is time-to-event. Here, we propose a matching-based machine learning method to identify the optimal dynamic treatment regime with time-to-event outcomes subject to right-censoring using electronic health record data. In contrast to the established inverse probability weighting-based dynamic treatment regime methods, our proposed approach provides better protection against model misspecification and extreme weights in the context of treatment sequences, effectively addressing a prevalent challenge in the longitudinal analysis of electronic health record data. In simulations, the proposed method demonstrates robust performance across a range of scenarios. In addition, we illustrate the method with an application to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer using a real-world, nationwide electronic health record database from Flatiron Health.

摘要

观察性数据(例如电子健康记录)在基于证据的动态治疗方案研究中变得越来越重要,这种治疗方案根据患者的特征和不断变化的临床病史,随着时间的推移为患者定制治疗方案。对于临床医生和统计学家来说,确定最佳的动态治疗方案以产生每个个体的最佳预期临床结果并最大限度地提高人群的治疗效果非常重要。观察性数据为使用统计工具估计最佳动态治疗方案带来了各种挑战。值得注意的是,当主要关注的临床结果是事件发生时间时,任务变得更加复杂。在这里,我们提出了一种基于匹配的机器学习方法,用于使用电子健康记录数据识别具有事件时间结局的最优动态治疗方案,同时考虑右删失。与基于逆概率加权的既定动态治疗方案方法不同,我们提出的方法在治疗序列方面提供了更好的模型误配和极端权重保护,有效地解决了电子健康记录数据纵向分析中的一个普遍挑战。在模拟中,该方法在一系列场景中表现出稳健的性能。此外,我们还通过使用来自 Flatiron Health 的真实全国性电子健康记录数据库为晚期非小细胞肺癌患者估计最优动态治疗方案的应用来说明该方法。

相似文献

1
A matching-based machine learning approach to estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes with time-to-event outcomes.基于匹配的机器学习方法估计具有生存结局的最优动态治疗方案。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 May;33(5):794-806. doi: 10.1177/09622802241236954. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
2
Adapting machine learning techniques to censored time-to-event health record data: A general-purpose approach using inverse probability of censoring weighting.使机器学习技术适用于删失的事件发生时间健康记录数据:一种使用删失加权逆概率的通用方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Jun;61:119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Model selection for survival individualized treatment rules using the jackknife estimator.利用刀切估计量进行生存个体化治疗规则的模型选择。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01811-6.
4
Generating Real-World Tumor Burden Endpoints from Electronic Health Record Data: Comparison of RECIST, Radiology-Anchored, and Clinician-Anchored Approaches for Abstracting Real-World Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.从电子健康记录数据中生成真实世界的肿瘤负担终点:RECIST、放射学锚定和临床医生锚定方法在非小细胞肺癌真实世界进展中的比较。
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2122-2136. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00970-1. Epub 2019 May 28.
5
Estimation of optimal treatment regimes with electronic medical record data using the residual life value estimator.利用剩余寿命值估计器从电子病历数据中估计最佳治疗方案。
Biostatistics. 2024 Oct 1;25(4):933-946. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxae002.
6
Accountable survival contrast-learning for optimal dynamic treatment regimes.有责任的生存对比学习用于最优动态治疗方案。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 8;13(1):2250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29106-w.
7
Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.用于估计最优动态治疗方案的动态模式边际结构均值模型,第一部分:主要内容。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 8.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Doubly robust estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes with multicategory treatments and survival outcomes.多类别处理和生存结局下最优动态治疗方案的双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2022 Oct 30;41(24):4903-4923. doi: 10.1002/sim.9543. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
10
Comparison of dynamic treatment regimes via inverse probability weighting.通过逆概率加权法比较动态治疗方案
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 Mar;98(3):237-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_329.x.