• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉搜索中的错误:是随机的还是确定的?

Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?

机构信息

The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Mar 19;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00543-z.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-024-00543-z
PMID:38502280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10951178/
Abstract

In any visual search task in the lab or in the world, observers will make errors. Those errors can be categorized as "deterministic": If you miss this target in this display once, you will definitely miss it again. Alternatively, errors can be "stochastic", occurring randomly with some probability from trial to trial. Researchers and practitioners have sought to reduce errors in visual search, but different types of errors might require different techniques for mitigation. To empirically categorize errors in a simple search task, our observers searched for the letter "T" among "L" distractors, with each display presented twice. When the letters were clearly visible (white letters on a gray background), the errors were almost completely stochastic (Exp 1). An error made on the first appearance of a display did not predict that an error would be made on the second appearance. When the visibility of the letters was manipulated (letters of different gray levels on a noisy background), the errors became a mix of stochastic and deterministic. Unsurprisingly, lower contrast targets produced more deterministic errors. (Exp 2). Using the stimuli of Exp 2, we tested whether errors could be reduced using cues that guided attention around the display but knew nothing about the content of that display (Exp3a, b). This had no effect, but cueing all item locations did succeed in reducing deterministic errors (Exp3c).

摘要

在实验室或现实世界中的任何视觉搜索任务中,观察者都会犯错。这些错误可以分为“确定性”:如果您在这次显示中错过了这个目标,那么您肯定会再次错过它。或者,错误可能是“随机的”,每次试验都会以一定的概率随机发生。研究人员和从业者一直试图减少视觉搜索中的错误,但不同类型的错误可能需要不同的技术来减轻。为了在简单的搜索任务中对错误进行经验分类,我们的观察者在“L”干扰项中搜索字母“T”,每次显示呈现两次。当字母清晰可见(白色字母在灰色背景上)时,错误几乎完全是随机的(实验 1)。在显示的第一次出现时犯的错误并不能预测在第二次出现时会犯错误。当字母的可见性被操纵(不同灰度级的字母在嘈杂的背景上)时,错误变成了随机和确定性的混合。毫不奇怪,对比度较低的目标会产生更多确定性的错误。(实验 2)。使用实验 2 的刺激,我们测试了使用提示来引导注意力围绕显示,但对显示的内容一无所知的提示是否可以减少错误(实验 3a、b)。这没有效果,但提示所有项目位置确实成功地减少了确定性错误(实验 3c)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/0e17f0114751/41235_2024_543_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/3b1183e46a4a/41235_2024_543_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/a52d4907edf9/41235_2024_543_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/70416fdbad15/41235_2024_543_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/996251b9bf78/41235_2024_543_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/2ef221f21055/41235_2024_543_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/1011bed9936d/41235_2024_543_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/a3acceede1d1/41235_2024_543_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/04e49db59ce0/41235_2024_543_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/32096482cbac/41235_2024_543_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/67188f412d70/41235_2024_543_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/5c96e082ba04/41235_2024_543_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/502926a8a04a/41235_2024_543_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/0e17f0114751/41235_2024_543_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/3b1183e46a4a/41235_2024_543_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/a52d4907edf9/41235_2024_543_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/70416fdbad15/41235_2024_543_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/996251b9bf78/41235_2024_543_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/2ef221f21055/41235_2024_543_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/1011bed9936d/41235_2024_543_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/a3acceede1d1/41235_2024_543_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/04e49db59ce0/41235_2024_543_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/32096482cbac/41235_2024_543_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/67188f412d70/41235_2024_543_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/5c96e082ba04/41235_2024_543_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/502926a8a04a/41235_2024_543_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a39/10951178/0e17f0114751/41235_2024_543_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?视觉搜索中的错误:是随机的还是确定的?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Mar 19;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00543-z.
2
In simple but challenging search tasks, most errors are stochastic.在简单但具有挑战性的搜索任务中,大多数错误是随机的。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2289-2300. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02938-y. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
More or less? Improving monocular head mounted display assisted visual search by reducing guidance precision.或多或少?通过降低引导精度来改进单目头戴式显示器辅助视觉搜索。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jul;102:103720. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103720. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Visual search among items of different salience: removal of visual attention mimics a lesion in extrastriate area V4.在不同显著性的项目之间进行视觉搜索:去除视觉注意力类似于纹外区域V4的损伤。
J Neurosci. 1994 Feb;14(2):554-67. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-02-00554.1994.
5
Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.概率性回溯提示并不决定视觉工作记忆中的状态。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):641-646. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7.
6
The attentional blink in amblyopia.弱视中的注意瞬脱。
J Vis. 2008 Oct 31;8(13):12.1-9. doi: 10.1167/8.13.12.
7
Effect of lateralized kinetic visual cues on visual search in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.侧化动态视觉线索对单侧空间忽视患者视觉搜索的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Dec;17(6):856-67. doi: 10.1080/01688639508402435.
8
Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience.视觉搜索错误之前的额眼区活动揭示了自下而上和自上而下显著性的整合。
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):337-51. doi: 10.1152/jn.00330.2004. Epub 2004 Aug 18.
9
The role of categorization in visual search for orientation.分类在视觉定向搜索中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Feb;18(1):34-49. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.1.34.
10
Contextual cueing in preview search.预览搜索中的情境线索提示
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):2862-2875. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02052-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Errors in visual search: How can we reduce them?视觉搜索中的错误:我们如何减少它们?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jul;87(5):1471-1495. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03095-6. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
When Nurses in an Emergency Situation Look for a Medical Item But Fail to See It.当护士在紧急情况下寻找医疗用品但找不到时。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241279811. doi: 10.1177/00469580241279811.
3
In simple but challenging search tasks, most errors are stochastic.在简单但具有挑战性的搜索任务中,大多数错误是随机的。

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer missed at screening; hindsight or mistakes?乳腺癌筛查漏诊;后见之明还是失误?
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110913. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110913. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
2
Normal blindness: when we Look But Fail To See.正常盲视:当我们看而不见时。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;26(9):809-819. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
3
Malpractice Litigation: The Elephant in the Reading Room.医疗事故诉讼:阅览室里的大象(指显而易见却被忽视的问题)
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2289-2300. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02938-y. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Jul;19(7):801-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
What do experts look at and what do experts find when reading mammograms?专家在阅读乳房X光片时会看什么,又能发现什么?
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jul;8(4):045501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.4.045501. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
5
True and Missed Interval Cancer in Organized Mammographic Screening: A Retrospective Review Study of Diagnostic and Prior Screening Mammograms.在有组织的乳房 X 光筛查中,真正的和漏诊的间隔期癌症:对诊断和既往筛查乳房 X 光片的回顾性研究。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Jan;29 Suppl 1:S180-S191. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.022. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
The illusion of absence: how a common feature of magic shows can explain a class of road accidents.缺席的幻觉:魔术表演中的一个常见特征如何解释一类道路交通事故。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Mar 24;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00287-0.
7
Visual search errors are persistent in a laboratory analog of the incidental finding problem.在偶发发现问题的实验室模拟情境中,视觉搜索错误持续存在。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Jul 29;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00235-4.
8
Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance and sources of errors: An eye-tracking study.个体差异预测低发生率视觉搜索表现和错误来源:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Dec;26(4):646-658. doi: 10.1037/xap0000273. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
9
Visual search in breast imaging.乳腺影像学中的视觉搜索。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Oct;92(1102):20190057. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190057. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.