Suppr超能文献

在局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌中的真实世界应用、剂量强度和依度珠单抗的依从性。

Real-world use, dose intensity, and adherence to enfortumab vedotin in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;42(6):177.e1-177.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer as later-line therapy (post-immunotherapy and -platinum-chemotherapy) and as earlier-line therapy (cisplatin-ineligible, at least 1 prior therapy). We examined real-world EV monotherapy use, dose intensity and adherence across 280 US cancer clinics.

METHODS

This postmarketing study used data from a nationwide (United States) deidentified patient-level electronic health record-derived database. Included were patients with advanced urothelial cancer initiating EV on or after December 19, 2019 (date of accelerated approval). We summarized characteristics of EV users using descriptive statistics and computed metrics of EV use, EV dose intensity, and EV treatment adherence.

RESULTS

We identified 416 advanced urothelial cancer patients initiating EV monotherapy. More than half of patients (55.3%) received EV as later-line therapy (3L+), and nearly half (44.7%) received EV as earlier line therapy (1 or 2L). Dosing frequency (mean [SD] 2.4 [0.5] treatments per 28 day cycle) and dose (1.1 [0.2] mg/kg) were lower than label indication guidelines (1.25 mg/kg, Day 1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle). Only 58.8% of patients received an average of >2 treatments per 28-day cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with EV monotherapy in contemporary practice, EV dosing frequency, and dosage was lower in clinical practice than recommended in the product labeling. Further research is required to understand clinical factors and outcomes associated with the differences observed.

摘要

背景

依维莫司单抗(EV)单药疗法已被批准用于治疗晚期尿路上皮癌,包括后线治疗(免疫治疗和铂类化疗后)和一线治疗(不适合顺铂治疗,至少有 1 种既往治疗)。我们研究了 280 家美国癌症诊所中 EV 单药治疗的实际应用、剂量强度和依从性。

方法

这项上市后研究使用了全国(美国)匿名患者级电子健康记录衍生数据库中的数据。纳入了于 2019 年 12 月 19 日(加速批准日期)后开始接受 EV 治疗的晚期尿路上皮癌患者。我们使用描述性统计方法总结了 EV 使用者的特征,并计算了 EV 使用、EV 剂量强度和 EV 治疗依从性的指标。

结果

我们确定了 416 例开始 EV 单药治疗的晚期尿路上皮癌患者。超过一半的患者(55.3%)接受 EV 作为后线治疗(3L+),近一半(44.7%)接受 EV 作为一线治疗(1 或 2L)。治疗频率(每个 28 天周期的平均[SD]为 2.4[0.5]次治疗)和剂量(1.1[0.2]mg/kg)低于标签推荐的剂量(1.25mg/kg,第 1、8、15 天的 28 天周期)。只有 58.8%的患者平均接受>2 次 28 天周期的治疗。

结论

在接受 EV 单药治疗的晚期尿路上皮癌患者中,EV 的给药频率和剂量低于产品标签中的推荐剂量。需要进一步研究以了解与观察到的差异相关的临床因素和结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验