Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Medicine, Education of Personal and Interpersonal Competencies in Health Care, Witten, Germany.
Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane Senftenberg, Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Senftenberg, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 15;41(1):Doc4. doi: 10.3205/zma001659. eCollection 2024.
The aim of the study was to assess the current curricular status of content on infection prevention in hospitals during medical education prior to the development of a serious game on infection prevention in hospitals. In addition, the data collected was to be contrasted with the training for a specialist nurse in hygiene and infection prevention (FKHI).
In an online survey, persons in charge of medical degree programs and continuing education centers for FKHI, SkillsLabs and professional associations in Germany were asked to answer 28 questions on framework conditions, teaching, examinations, and gamification.
Data was collected for 22 medical degree programs and 5 FKHI continuing education centers. Due to the low response rate, the data for the FKHI was only analyzed in summary form. On average, 13.5 teaching units (median) are available in medical studies. Six degree programs have a longitudinal curriculum. In 7 of the 22 degree programs, teaching is based on the National Competency-Based Learning Objectives Catalogue (NKLM). Almost all locations teach this content in lectures (n=18) and/or in internships (n=13). Teaching and examinations are most common in the third year of study (n=12). In addition to practical OSCE examinations (n=5), written (n=12) and computer-based (n=8) examinations are used in particular. Gamification is known as a didactic approach to some extent but is not used for teaching infection prevention.
Infection prevention in hospitals is given relatively low priority in medical education. Teaching and examinations are based on traditional knowledge-oriented formats, although practical teaching and practical examinations are established at some locations. In contrast to the FKHI, learning objectives currently appear to be less standardized. Further interprofessional development of teaching would be desirable in the future.
本研究旨在评估在开发医院感染预防严肃游戏之前,医学教育中医院感染预防内容的现行课程现状。此外,收集的数据将与卫生和感染预防(FKHI)专科护士培训进行对比。
通过在线调查,向德国的医学学位课程和 FKHI 继续教育中心负责人、SkillsLabs 和专业协会负责人询问了 28 个关于框架条件、教学、考试和游戏化的问题。
共收集了 22 个医学学位课程和 5 个 FKHI 继续教育中心的数据。由于回复率低,仅对 FKHI 的数据进行了总结分析。在医学研究中,平均有 13.5 个教学单元(中位数)。6 个学位课程有纵向课程。在 22 个学位课程中有 7 个基于国家能力本位学习目标目录(NKLM)进行教学。几乎所有地点都通过讲座(n=18)和/或实习(n=13)教授这一内容。教学和考试最常见于第三学年(n=12)。除了实践 OSCE 考试(n=5)外,还特别使用书面(n=12)和计算机化(n=8)考试。游戏化在一定程度上被认为是一种教学方法,但并未用于教授感染预防。
医院感染预防在医学教育中受到的重视相对较低。教学和考试基于传统的知识导向模式,尽管一些地点已经建立了实践教学和实践考试。与 FKHI 相比,目前学习目标似乎标准化程度较低。未来还需要进一步开展跨专业教学发展。