Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Botany, Stuttgart State Museum of Natural History, Stuttgart, Germany; Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 20;926:171741. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171741. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
Mounting evidence points to the need for high-resolution climatic data in biodiversity analyses under global change. As we move to finer resolution, other factors than climate, including other abiotic variables and biotic interactions play, however, an increasing role, raising the question of our ability to predict community composition at fine scales. Focusing on two lineages of land plants, bryophytes and tracheophytes, we determine the relative contribution of climatic, non-climatic environmental drivers, spatial effects, community architecture and composition of one lineage to predict community composition of the other lineage, and how our ability to predict community composition varies along an elevation gradient. The relationship between community composition of one lineage and 68 environmental variables at 2-25 m spatial resolution, architecture and composition of the other lineage, and spatial factors, was investigated by hierarchical and variance partitioning across 413 2x2m plots in the Swiss Alps. Climatic data, although significant, contributed less to the model than any other variable considered. Community composition of one lineage, reflecting both direct interactions and unmeasured (hidden) abiotic factors, was the best predictor of community composition of the other lineage. Total explained variance substantially varied with elevation, underlining the fact that the strength of the species composition-environment relationship varies depending on environmental conditions. Total variance explained increased towards high elevation up to 50 %, with an increasing importance of spatial effects and vegetation architecture, pointing to increasing positive interactions and aggregated species distribution patterns in alpine environments. In tracheophytes, an increase of the contribution of non-climatic environmental factors was also observed at high elevation, in line with the hypothesis of a stronger environmental control under harsher conditions. Further improvements of our ability to predict changes in plant community composition may involve the implementation of historical variables and higher-resolution climatic data to better describe the microhabitat conditions actually experienced by organisms.
越来越多的证据表明,在全球变化下的生物多样性分析中需要高分辨率的气候数据。然而,随着分辨率的提高,气候以外的其他因素,包括其他非生物变量和生物相互作用,发挥着越来越重要的作用,这就提出了我们在小尺度上预测群落组成的能力问题。本文以苔藓植物和维管植物这两个陆地植物谱系为研究对象,确定气候、非气候环境驱动因素、空间效应、群落结构和一个谱系的组成对另一个谱系的群落组成的相对贡献,以及我们预测群落组成的能力沿海拔梯度的变化情况。通过在瑞士阿尔卑斯山的 413 个 2x2m 样地中进行层次分析和方差分解,研究了一个谱系的群落组成与 2-25m 空间分辨率下的 68 个环境变量、另一个谱系的结构和组成以及空间因素之间的关系。尽管气候数据很重要,但对模型的贡献不及其他任何考虑因素。一个谱系的群落组成,反映了直接相互作用和未测量的(隐藏)非生物因素,是另一个谱系群落组成的最佳预测因子。总解释方差随海拔高度有很大差异,这强调了物种组成与环境关系的强度取决于环境条件的事实。总方差解释随着海拔的升高而增加,空间效应和植被结构的重要性也随之增加,这表明在高山环境中,正相互作用和聚集的物种分布模式越来越多。在维管植物中,也观察到随着海拔的升高,非气候环境因素的贡献增加,这与在更恶劣条件下环境控制更强的假设一致。进一步提高我们预测植物群落组成变化的能力可能需要实施历史变量和更高分辨率的气候数据,以更好地描述生物实际经历的微生境条件。