Pourmoshtagh Hassan, Halaji Mehrdad, Ranjbar Sina, Ranjbar Reza
Department of Pediatrics, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 7;10(6):e27339. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27339. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
This study was conducted to identify the distribution of virulence determinants in uropathogenic (UPEC) isolates obtained from kidney transplant (KTP) and non-transplant patients (non-KTP) with urinary tract infections (UTI). Additionally, the (GTG)5 fingerprinting technique was used to investigate the genetic diversity of Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamase (ESBL)-positive isolates. In this case-control study, 111 urine isolates were obtained from non-KTPs and KTPs, respectively. The presence of genetic markers encoding adhesion proteins, toxins and major phylogroups was assessed through PCR amplification. Molecular typing of ESBL-positive UPEC strains was performed using (GTG)5 fingerprinting and Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) techniques. Overall, 65 and 46 UPEC isolates were obtained from non-KTPs and KTPs, respectively. Among the studied isolates, (85.6%) gene was the most frequently observed virulence gene, followed by (49.5%). Using the 80% cut-off point, all the 35 UPEC isolates were classified into four major clusters, namely A, B, C, and D. The majority of the Sequence Type (ST) 131 isolates belonged to cluster A. Additionally, three ST1193 isolates belonged to cluster A and phylogroup B. Moreover, ST38, ST131 and ST10 were in different cluster. In general, we observed significant differences in the , , and genes between KTPs and non-KTPs. Furthermore, since all the isolates carried one or more virulence factors (VFs), these findings are concerning in the context of managing UTIs caused by the UPEC strain. Additionally, the distribution of ST and Clonal Complex (CC) among isolates in the main clusters revealed significant differences between MLST and (GTG)5 fingerprinting analysis.
本研究旨在确定从患有尿路感染(UTI)的肾移植(KTP)患者和非移植患者(非KTP)中分离出的尿路致病性大肠杆菌(UPEC)菌株中毒力决定因素的分布情况。此外,采用(GTG)5指纹技术研究超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)阳性菌株的遗传多样性。在这项病例对照研究中,分别从非KTP患者和KTP患者中获得了111株尿液分离株。通过PCR扩增评估编码粘附蛋白、毒素和主要菌系的遗传标记的存在情况。使用(GTG)5指纹技术和多位点序列分型(MLST)技术对ESBL阳性UPEC菌株进行分子分型。总体而言,分别从非KTP患者和KTP患者中获得了65株和46株UPEC分离株。在所研究的分离株中,(85.6%)基因是最常观察到的毒力基因,其次是(49.5%)。使用80%的截断点,所有35株UPEC分离株被分为四个主要簇,即A、B、C和D。大多数序列型(ST)131分离株属于A簇。此外,三个ST1193分离株属于A簇和B菌系。此外,ST38、ST131和ST10处于不同的簇中。总体而言,我们观察到KTP患者和非KTP患者之间在、、和基因方面存在显著差异。此外,由于所有分离株都携带一种或多种毒力因子(VF),这些发现对于管理由UPEC菌株引起的UTI而言令人担忧。此外,主要簇中分离株之间的ST和克隆复合体(CC)分布显示MLST和(GTG)5指纹分析之间存在显著差异。