Chemerinski Anat, Shen May, Valero-Pacheco Nuriban, Zhao Qingshi, Murphy Trystn, George Lea, Lemenze Alex, Sherman Lauren, Heller Debra, Chen Xiaowei, Wu Tracy, McGovern Peter G, Morelli Sara S, Arora Ripla, Beaulieu Aimee M, Douglas Nataki C
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Health, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):1023-1041. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae048.
How does ovarian stimulation (OS), which is used to mature multiple oocytes for ART procedures, impact the principal cellular compartments and transcriptome of the human endometrium in the periovulatory and mid-secretory phases?
During the mid-secretory window of implantation, OS alters the abundance of endometrial immune cells, whereas during the periovulatory period, OS substantially changes the endometrial transcriptome and impacts both endometrial glandular and immune cells.
Pregnancies conceived in an OS cycle are at risk of complications reflective of abnormal placentation and placental function. OS can alter endometrial gene expression and immune cell populations. How OS impacts the glandular, stromal, immune, and vascular compartments of the endometrium, in the periovulatory period as compared to the window of implantation, is unknown.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective cohort study carried out between 2020 and 2022 included 25 subjects undergoing OS and 25 subjects in natural menstrual cycles. Endometrial biopsies were performed in the proliferative, periovulatory, and mid-secretory phases.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Blood samples were processed to determine serum estradiol and progesterone levels. Both the endometrial transcriptome and the principal cellular compartments of the endometrium, including glands, stroma, immune, and vasculature, were evaluated by examining endometrial dating, differential gene expression, protein expression, cell populations, and the three-dimensional structure in endometrial tissue. Mann-Whitney U tests, unpaired t-tests or one-way ANOVA and pairwise multiple comparison tests were used to statistically evaluate differences.
In the periovulatory period, OS induced high levels of differential gene expression, glandular-stromal dyssynchrony, and an increase in both glandular epithelial volume and the frequency of endometrial monocytes/macrophages. In the window of implantation during the mid-secretory phase, OS induced changes in endometrial immune cells, with a greater frequency of B cells and a lower frequency of CD4 effector T cells.
The data underlying this article have been uploaded to the Genome Expression Omnibus/National Center for Biotechnology Information with accession number GSE220044.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A limited number of subjects were included in this study, although the subjects within each group, natural cycle or OS, were homogenous in their clinical characteristics. The number of subjects utilized was sufficient to identify significant differences; however, with a larger number of subjects and additional power, we may detect additional differences. Another limitation of the study is that proliferative phase biopsies were collected in natural cycles, but not in OS cycles. Given that the OS cycle subjects did not have known endometrial factor infertility, and the comparisons involved subjects who had a similar and robust response to stimulation, the findings are generalizable to women with a normal response to OS.
OS substantially altered the periovulatory phase endometrium, with fewer transcriptomic and cell type-specific changes in the mid-secretory phase. Our findings show that after OS, the endometrial microenvironment in the window of implantation possesses many more similarities to that of a natural cycle than does the periovulatory endometrium. Further investigation of the immune compartment and the functional significance of this cellular compartment under OS conditions is warranted.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI148695 to A.M.B. and N.C.D.), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD109152 to R.A.), and the March of Dimes (5-FY20-209 to R.A.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or March of Dimes. All authors declare no conflict of interest.
用于辅助生殖技术程序以使多个卵母细胞成熟的卵巢刺激(OS)如何影响人类子宫内膜在排卵期和分泌中期的主要细胞成分和转录组?
在分泌中期的着床窗口期,OS会改变子宫内膜免疫细胞的丰度,而在排卵期,OS会显著改变子宫内膜转录组,并影响子宫内膜腺细胞和免疫细胞。
在OS周期中受孕的妊娠有出现反映胎盘植入异常和胎盘功能异常的并发症的风险。OS可改变子宫内膜基因表达和免疫细胞群体。与着床窗口期相比,OS如何影响子宫内膜在排卵期的腺细胞、基质细胞、免疫细胞和血管成分尚不清楚。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项前瞻性队列研究在2020年至2022年期间进行,包括25名接受OS的受试者和25名处于自然月经周期的受试者。在增殖期、排卵期和分泌中期进行子宫内膜活检。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:处理血样以测定血清雌二醇和孕酮水平。通过检查子宫内膜分期、差异基因表达、蛋白质表达、细胞群体以及子宫内膜组织的三维结构,评估子宫内膜转录组和子宫内膜的主要细胞成分,包括腺体、基质、免疫和血管。使用曼-惠特尼U检验、非配对t检验或单因素方差分析以及成对多重比较检验进行统计学差异评估。
在排卵期,OS诱导高水平的差异基因表达、腺-基质不同步,以及腺上皮体积增加和子宫内膜单核细胞/巨噬细胞频率增加。在分泌中期的着床窗口期,OS诱导子宫内膜免疫细胞发生变化,B细胞频率增加,CD4效应T细胞频率降低。
本文所依据的数据已上传至基因表达综合数据库/美国国立生物技术信息中心,登录号为GSE220044。
局限性、谨慎原因:本研究纳入的受试者数量有限,尽管每组(自然周期或OS组)内的受试者在临床特征上是同质的。所使用的受试者数量足以识别显著差异;然而,样本量更大且效力更强时,我们可能会检测到更多差异。该研究的另一个局限性是,增殖期活检样本是在自然周期中采集的,而非OS周期。鉴于OS周期组的受试者不存在已知的子宫内膜因素不孕症,且比较的是对刺激有相似且强烈反应的受试者,研究结果可推广至对OS反应正常的女性。
OS显著改变了排卵期子宫内膜,而在分泌中期转录组和细胞类型特异性变化较少。我们的研究结果表明,OS后,着床窗口期的子宫内膜微环境与自然周期的子宫内膜微环境相比,与排卵期子宫内膜的相似性更高。有必要进一步研究OS条件下免疫成分及其功能意义。
研究资金/利益冲突:本出版物中报告的研究得到了美国国立过敏与传染病研究所(给A.M.B.和N.C.D.的R01AI148695)、尤妮斯·肯尼迪·施赖弗国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所(给R.A.的R01HD109152)以及美国疾病控制与预防中心(给R.A.的5-FY20-209)的支持。内容仅由作者负责,不一定代表美国国立卫生研究院或美国疾病控制与预防中心的官方观点。所有作者均声明无利益冲突。