Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
PROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Mar 21;33:e16. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000210.
The mental health of sexual minority (SM) individuals remains overlooked and understudied in Czechia. We aimed to estimate (1) the prevalence rate and (2) the relative risk of common mental disorders and (3) the mental distress severity among the Czech SM people compared with the heterosexual population. In addition, we aimed to investigate help-seeking for mental disorders in SM people.
We used data from a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of Czech community-dwelling adults, consisting of 3063 respondents (response rate = 58.62%). We used the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview to assess the presence of mental disorders. In individuals scoring positively, we established help-seeking in the past 12 months. We assessed symptom severity using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. We computed the prevalence of mental disorders and the treatment gap with 95% confidence intervals. To assess the risk of having a mental disorder, we used binary logistic regression.
We demonstrated that the prevalence of current mental disorders was 18.85% (17.43-20.28), 52.27% (36.91-67.63), 33.33% (19.5-47.17) and 25.93% (13.85-38) in heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. Suicidal thoughts and behaviours were present in 5.73% (4.88-6.57), 25.00% (11.68-38.32), 22.92% (10.58-35.25) and 11.11% (2.45-19.77) of heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. After confounder adjustment, gay or lesbian individuals were more likely to have at least one current mental disorder compared with heterosexual counterparts (odds ratio = 3.51; 1.83-6.76). For bisexual and sexually more diverse individuals, the results were consistent with a null effect (1.85; 0.96-3.45 and 0.89; 0.42-1.73). The mean depression symptom severity was 2.96 (2.81-3.11) in heterosexual people and 4.68 (2.95-6.42), 7.12 (5.07-9.18) and 5.17 (3.38-6.95) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. The mean anxiety symptom severity was 1.97 (1.85-2.08) in heterosexual people and 3.5 (1.98-5.02), 4.63 (3.05-6.2) and 3.7 (2.29-5.11) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. We demonstrated broadly consistent levels of treatment gap in heterosexual and SM individuals scoring positively for at least one current mental disorder (82.91%; 79.5-85.96 vs. 81.13%; 68.03-90.56).
We provide evidence that SM people in Czechia have substantially worse mental health outcomes than their heterosexual counterparts. Systemic changes are imperative to provide not only better and more sensitive care to SM individuals but also to address structural stigma contributing to these health disparities.
性少数群体(SM)的心理健康在捷克仍未得到重视和研究。我们旨在评估(1)常见精神障碍的患病率和(2)相对风险,以及(3)与异性恋人群相比,捷克 SM 人群的精神困扰严重程度。此外,我们还旨在调查 SM 人群寻求精神障碍治疗的情况。
我们使用了来自捷克社区居住的成年人的横断面、全国代表性调查的数据,该调查包括 3063 名受访者(回应率=58.62%)。我们使用迷你国际神经精神访谈来评估精神障碍的存在。在阳性评分的个体中,我们确定了过去 12 个月内的求助情况。我们使用 9 项患者健康问卷和 7 项广泛性焦虑症量表来评估症状严重程度。我们计算了精神障碍的患病率和治疗差距,置信区间为 95%。为了评估患有精神障碍的风险,我们使用了二元逻辑回归。
我们证明,当前精神障碍的患病率分别为异性恋者 18.85%(17.43-20.28)、同性恋或双性恋者 52.27%(36.91-67.63)、双性恋者和更多性多样化者 33.33%(19.5-47.17)和 25.93%(13.85-38)。在异性恋者、同性恋或双性恋者、双性恋者和更多性多样化者中,分别有 5.73%(4.88-6.57)、25.00%(11.68-38.32)、22.92%(10.58-35.25)和 11.11%(2.45-19.77)存在自杀想法和行为。同性恋或双性恋者与异性恋者相比,至少有一种当前精神障碍的可能性更高(比值比=3.51;1.83-6.76)。在调整混杂因素后,双性恋者和性多样化者的结果与零效应一致(1.85;0.96-3.45 和 0.89;0.42-1.73)。异性恋者的抑郁症状严重程度平均为 2.96(2.81-3.11),而同性恋或双性恋者、双性恋者和性多样化者的抑郁症状严重程度分别为 4.68(2.95-6.42)、7.12(5.07-9.18)和 5.17(3.38-6.95)。异性恋者的焦虑症状严重程度平均为 1.97(1.85-2.08),而同性恋或双性恋者、双性恋者和性多样化者的焦虑症状严重程度分别为 3.5(1.98-5.02)、4.63(3.05-6.2)和 3.7(2.29-5.11)。我们证明,在异性恋者和 SM 人群中,对至少一种当前精神障碍评分阳性的个体中,治疗差距大致一致(82.91%;79.5-85.96 与 81.13%;68.03-90.56)。
我们提供的证据表明,捷克的 SM 人群的心理健康结果明显比异性恋者差。需要进行系统性变革,不仅为 SM 个体提供更好、更敏感的护理,还要解决导致这些健康差距的结构性耻辱问题。