Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):3563-3585. doi: 10.1177/08862605221108087. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Country-level structural stigma toward sexual minority individuals (i.e., discriminatory laws and policies and prejudicial attitudes) shows robust associations with sexual minority individuals' mental health and individual-level stigma processes, such as identity concealment. Whether structural stigma is also associated with interpersonal-level stigma processes, such as victimization, is rarely studied. Whether the association between structural stigma and sexual minority individuals' interpersonal mistreatment varies across gender, gender nonconformity, and socioeconomic status also remains to be determined.
In 2012, sexual minority adults ( = 86,308) living in 28 European countries responded to questions assessing past-12-month victimization experiences (i.e., physical or sexual attack or threat of violence). Country-level structural stigma was objectively indexed as an aggregate of national laws, policies, and population attitudes negatively affecting sexual minority individuals.
Country-level structural stigma was significantly associated with victimization (adjusted odds ratios [AOR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.22; = .004). However, this effect varied by gender, gender nonconformity, and socioeconomic status. For both sexual minority men and women, gender nonconformity and lower socioeconomic status were associated with increased risk of victimization. The strongest association between country-level stigma and victimization was found among gender nonconforming men with lower socioeconomic status (AOR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.52; < .001).
A much larger proportion of sexual minorities living in higher stigma countries reports victimization than those living in lower stigma countries. At the same time, the association between country-level structural stigma and victimization is most heavily concentrated among gender nonconforming men with lower socioeconomic status.
国家层面针对性少数群体个体的结构性耻辱感(即歧视性法律、政策和偏见态度)与性少数群体个体的心理健康以及个体层面的耻辱感过程(如身份隐瞒)之间存在显著关联。结构性耻辱感是否与人际层面的耻辱感过程(如受害)也有关联,这很少被研究。结构性耻辱感与性少数群体个体遭受人际虐待之间的关联是否因性别、性别不一致和社会经济地位而异,也有待确定。
2012 年,生活在 28 个欧洲国家的性少数成年个体(=86308 人)回答了有关过去 12 个月受害经历(即身体或性攻击或暴力威胁)的问题。国家层面的结构性耻辱感客观地被定义为国家法律、政策和人口态度的综合指标,这些法律、政策和人口态度对性少数群体个体产生负面影响。
国家层面的结构性耻辱感与受害显著相关(调整后的优势比 [AOR]:1.13,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.04-1.22;=0.004)。然而,这种效应因性别、性别不一致和社会经济地位而异。对于性少数男性和女性,性别不一致和较低的社会经济地位与受害风险增加相关。在国家层面的耻辱感与受害之间的关联最强的是社会经济地位较低的性别不一致的男性(AOR:1.32,95%CI:1.14-1.52;<0.001)。
生活在耻辱感较高国家的性少数群体中,报告受害的比例要远高于生活在耻辱感较低国家的性少数群体。与此同时,国家层面的结构性耻辱感与受害之间的关联主要集中在社会经济地位较低的性别不一致的男性中。