Suppr超能文献

来自世界卫生组织和卫生部的补充喂养指标:2018 年巴西巴伊亚西南部队列儿童中估计流行率的一致性分析和比较。

Complementary feeding indicators from the World Health Organization and the Ministry of Health: agreement analysis and comparison of estimated prevalence in a cohort of children in southwestern Bahia, Brazil, 2018.

机构信息

Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brazil.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Alimentação, Nutrição e Saúde, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2024 Mar 15;33:e2023556. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e2023556.en. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the agreement between complementary feeding indicators established by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Ministry of Health (MOH) and to compare the prevalence of these indicators in the first year of a child's life.

METHODS

: This was a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 286 children from Vitória da Conquista, state of Bahia, Brazil; agreement between indicators and comparison between prevalences were analyzed using the Kappa coefficient and McNemar's test; the prevalence of the indicators "introduction of complementary feeding" (ICF), "minimum dietary diversity" (MDD), "minimum meal frequency" (MMF) and "minimum acceptable diet" (MAD) were calculated.

RESULTS

: Three indicators showed poor agreement, with only one demonstrating moderate agreement; prevalence of WHO indicators was higher than that of the MOH (ICF, 94.3% vs. 20.7%; MDD, 75.2% vs. 50.7%; MMF, 97.2% vs. 44.8%; MAD, 96.8% vs. 26.9%).

CONCLUSION

The majority of indicators showed poor agreement and the prevalence of WHO indicators exceeded that of the Ministry of Health.

摘要

目的

评估世界卫生组织(世卫组织)和卫生部(卫生部)制定的补充喂养指标之间的一致性,并比较这些指标在儿童生命的第一年中的流行率。

方法

这是巴西巴伊亚州Vitória da Conquista 的 286 名儿童的队列的横断面研究;使用 Kappa 系数和 McNemar 检验分析指标之间的一致性和流行率之间的比较;计算了“补充喂养的引入”(ICF)、“最低饮食多样性”(MDD)、“最低进餐频率”(MMF)和“最低可接受饮食”(MAD)的流行率。

结果

三个指标显示一致性差,只有一个显示中度一致性;世卫组织指标的流行率高于卫生部的流行率(ICF,94.3%对 20.7%;MDD,75.2%对 50.7%;MMF,97.2%对 44.8%;MAD,96.8%对 26.9%)。

结论

大多数指标显示一致性差,世卫组织指标的流行率超过了卫生部的流行率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/430a/10953651/a5ce394acf1e/2237-9622-ress-33-e2023556-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验