Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3K7, Canada.
Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):826-838. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01366-2. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
The mental health treatment gap remains wide across the world despite mental illness being a significant cause of disability globally. Both end-user and healthcare provider perspectives are critical to understanding barriers to mental healthcare and developing interventions. However, the views of providers are relatively understudied. In this review, we synthesized findings from current literature regarding providers' perspectives on barriers to mental healthcare in Canada. We searched Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL for eligible Canadian studies published since 2000. Analysis and quality assessment were conducted on the included studies. Of 4,773 reports screened, 29 moderate-high quality studies were reviewed. Five themes of barriers emerged: health systems availability and complexity (reported in 72% of the studies), work conditions (55%), training/education (52%), patient accessibility (41%), and identity-based sensitivity (17%). Common barriers included lack of resources, fragmented services, and gaps in continuing education. Interestingly, clinicians often cited confusion in determining the ideal service for patients due to an overwhelming number of potential services without clear descriptions. These five domains of barriers present a synthesized review of areas of improvement for mental healthcare spanning both patients and clinicians. Canadian mental health systems face a need to improve capacity, clinician training, and in particular service navigability and collaboration.
尽管精神疾病是全球范围内导致残疾的一个重要原因,但全球范围内精神卫生治疗的差距仍然很大。了解精神卫生保健障碍和制定干预措施,最终用户和医疗保健提供者的观点都至关重要。然而,提供者的观点相对研究不足。在这篇综述中,我们综合了当前文献中关于加拿大精神卫生保健提供者观点的研究结果。我们在 Medline、PsycINFO、Embase 和 CINAHL 中搜索了自 2000 年以来发表的加拿大合格研究。对纳入的研究进行了分析和质量评估。在筛选出的 4773 份报告中,有 29 项高质量研究进行了综述。出现了五个障碍主题:卫生系统的可用性和复杂性(在 72%的研究中报告)、工作条件(55%)、培训/教育(52%)、患者可及性(41%)和基于身份的敏感性(17%)。常见的障碍包括资源缺乏、服务分散以及继续教育方面的差距。有趣的是,由于潜在服务数量过多而缺乏明确描述,临床医生经常因难以确定为患者提供理想服务而感到困惑。这五个障碍领域综合了加拿大精神卫生保健领域的改进领域,涵盖了患者和临床医生。加拿大精神卫生系统需要提高能力、临床医生培训,特别是服务可及性和协作。